Benchmark Almanac

SWE-Dev

Kimi K2 Sep 2025 66.6% Dropped

Models implement new features in real Python repositories from requirement documents, across 500 test tasks. Developer-written unit tests decide pass or fail.

In the authors’ words

Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown strong capability in diverse software engineering tasks. However, feature-driven development, a highly prevalent real-world task that involves developing new functionalities for large, existing codebases, remains underexplored. We therefore introduce SWE-Dev, the first large-scale dataset (with 14,000 training and 500 test samples) designed to evaluate and train autonomous coding systems on real-world end-to-end feature-driven software development tasks. To ensure verifiable and diverse training, SWE-Dev uniquely provides all instances with a runnable environment and its developer-authored executable unit tests. This collection not only provides high-quality data for Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT), but also enables Reinforcement Learning (RL) by delivering accurate reward signals from executable unit tests. We evaluated SWE-Dev across 17 base LLMs, 10 reasoning-focused LLMs, 10 multi-agent systems, and 8 tool-augmented LLM agents. Results show substantial headroom: the best single-turn model reaches only 22.51% Pass@1 on the hard split, while OpenHands agents improve to 56.44% but still leave many tasks unsolved. Code is available here https://github.com/DorothyDUUU/SWE-Dev.

Abstract of SWE-Dev: Evaluating and Training Autonomous Feature-Driven Software Development (arXiv:2505.16975, CC0)
Made by Shanghai Jiao Tong University Released May 2025 Fixing real repositories All tasks public Last in a launch post Sep 2025 , dropped before it saturated Last model added Sep 2025
Level
Expert Specialists with years of training, often over hours of work
Scored
Checked automatically A program checks the result against an answer key, unit tests or the expected final state.
Answers
Code A program or patch run against tests.
1
Model scored in lab cards
1
Launch post lists it, from 1 lab

Kimi K2 leads with 66.6%

Best score per model as labs report them in their own cards. Labs pick their own settings, so these compare less cleanly than independent runs.

  1. 1 Kimi K2 Sep 2025 66.6%
#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 Kimi K2 Sep 2025 66.6% Sep 2025 Model card

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

Reported by the lab in its model card
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Near the ceiling (85%) Kimi K2 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Near the ceiling (85%) Kimi K2

No launch post has listed it since Sep 2025

Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.

Moonshot AI
DateLaunch postScoreAs the post writes it
5 Sep 2025 Kimi K2 66.6 SWE-Dev, ACC

More in Coding

All 243 in Coding
  • SWE-bench Verified In use 500 human-validated GitHub issues from 12 Python repos. Agent writes a patch that must pass hidden tests. Claude Opus 4.7 83.5%
  • SWE-bench Multilingual In use 300 GitHub-issue tasks across nine programming languages in SWE-bench format. Patch graded by repository tests. Claude Opus 5.5 93.9%
  • LiveCodeBench v6 In use Competitive programming problems collected after model cutoffs from LeetCode, AtCoder, Codeforces. Scored pass@1 on hidden tests. DeepSeek-V4-Pro 93.5%
  • DeepSWE In use 113 original long-horizon engineering tasks across 91 repos and five languages, written from scratch. Hand-written verifiers accept alternative solutions. GPT-6 Astra 74.1%
  • SciCode In use Scientist-curated research coding problems split into subproblems across natural sciences. Code checked against test cases. Seed2.1 Pro 59.8%
  • Codeforces rating In use Model solves recent Codeforces contest problems. An Elo-style rating is computed from simulated contest performance. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 3,471