Benchmark Almanac

SWE-bench

Claude Opus 4.5 52.6% leads since Nov 2025 Not in model cards

Models resolve 2,294 real GitHub issues from 12 Python repositories. A patch counts as resolved when the hidden repository tests pass.

The original set behind SWE-bench Lite (March 2024) and SWE-bench Verified (August 2024).

In the authors’ words

Language models have outpaced our ability to evaluate them effectively, but for their future development it is essential to study the frontier of their capabilities. We find real-world software engineering to be a rich, sustainable, and challenging testbed for evaluating the next generation of language models. To this end, we introduce SWE-bench, an evaluation framework consisting of 2,294 software engineering problems drawn from real GitHub issues and corresponding pull requests across 12 popular Python repositories. Given a codebase along with a description of an issue to be resolved, a language model is tasked with editing the codebase to address the issue. Resolving issues in SWE-bench frequently requires understanding and coordinating changes across multiple functions, classes, and even files simultaneously, calling for models to interact with execution environments, process extremely long contexts and perform complex reasoning that goes far beyond traditional code generation tasks. Our evaluations show that both state-of-the-art proprietary models and our fine-tuned model SWE-Llama can resolve only the simplest issues. The best-performing model, Claude 2, is able to solve a mere 1.96% of the issues. Advances on SWE-bench represent steps towards LMs that are more practical, intelligent, and autonomous.

Abstract of SWE-bench: Can Language Models Resolve Real-World GitHub Issues? (arXiv:2310.06770, CC0)
Made by Princeton University (SWE-bench team) Released Oct 2023 Fixing real repositories All tasks public Last model added Nov 2025 Scores refreshed 2 Nov 2026
Level
Expert Specialists with years of training, often over hours of work
Scored
Checked automatically A program checks the result against an answer key, unit tests or the expected final state.
Answers
Code A program or patch run against tests.
12
Entries on its own leaderboard, 9 models we track

Claude Opus 4.5 leads with 52.6% among models released by Nov 2025

Best score per entry from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on 2 Nov 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Names in gray aren't in our model list: fine-tunes, agent systems, products and older models. They don't count toward leaders.

The newest model with a score here came out in Nov 2025, and nobody has tested a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:

  1. 1 Claude Opus 4.5 52.6%
  2. 2 Undisclosed 42%
  3. 3 Claude 3.7 Sonnet 33.8%
  4. 4 CodeAct v2.1 (claude-3-5-sonnet-20241022) 29.4%
  5. 5 Claude 3.5 Sonnet 24.9%
  6. 6 GPT-4o May 2024 18.8%
  7. 7 GPT-4 Turbo Nov 2023 12.5%
  8. 8 Claude 3 Opus 10.5%
  9. 9 Claude 2 1.96%
  10. 10 SWE-Llama 13B 0.70%
  11. 11 SWE-Llama 7B 0.70%
  12. 12 GPT-3.5 0.17%
#EntryScoreSettingDateSource
1 Claude Opus 4.5 52.6% Sonar Foundation Agent Nov 2025 Official leaderboard
2 Undisclosed 42% Atlassian Rovo Dev Jun 2025 Official leaderboard
3 Claude 3.7 Sonnet 33.8% SWE-agent 1.0 Feb 2025 Official leaderboard
4 CodeAct v2.1 (claude-3-5-sonnet-20241022) 29.4% OpenHands Nov 2024 Official leaderboard
5 Claude 3.5 Sonnet 24.9% AutoCodeRover-v2.0 Jun 2024 Official leaderboard
6 GPT-4o May 2024 18.8% AutoCodeRover May 2024 Official leaderboard
7 GPT-4 Turbo Nov 2023 12.5% SWE-agent Nov 2023 Official leaderboard
8 Claude 3 Opus 10.5% SWE-agent Feb 2024 Official leaderboard
9 Claude 2 1.96% RAG baseline Jul 2023 Official leaderboard
10 SWE-Llama 13B 0.70% RAG baseline Oct 2023 Official leaderboard
11 SWE-Llama 7B 0.70% RAG baseline Oct 2023 Official leaderboard
12 GPT-3.5 0.17% RAG baseline Oct 2023 Official leaderboard

6 models have held number one since its release in Oct 2023

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.

Anthropic OpenAI
Own leaderboard Not tested since Nov 2025

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

On the benchmark’s own leaderboard Best so far
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2024 2025 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) Claude Opus 4.5 Claude 3.7 Sonnet Claude 3.5 Sonnet GPT-4o GPT-4 Turbo Claude 2 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2024 2025 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) Claude Opus 4.5 Claude 3.7 Sonnet

No lab model card reports it yet

We read the headline results of 479 launch posts from 51 labs, and none of them list this benchmark.

More in Coding

All 243 in Coding
  • SWE-bench Verified In use 500 human-validated GitHub issues from 12 Python repos. Agent writes a patch that must pass hidden tests. Claude Opus 4.7 83.5%
  • SWE-bench Multilingual In use 300 GitHub-issue tasks across nine programming languages in SWE-bench format. Patch graded by repository tests. Claude Opus 5.5 93.9%
  • LiveCodeBench v6 In use Competitive programming problems collected after model cutoffs from LeetCode, AtCoder, Codeforces. Scored pass@1 on hidden tests. DeepSeek-V4-Pro 93.5%
  • DeepSWE In use 113 original long-horizon engineering tasks across 91 repos and five languages, written from scratch. Hand-written verifiers accept alternative solutions. GPT-6 Astra 74.1%
  • SciCode In use Scientist-curated research coding problems split into subproblems across natural sciences. Code checked against test cases. Seed2.1 Pro 59.8%
  • Codeforces rating In use Model solves recent Codeforces contest problems. An Elo-style rating is computed from simulated contest performance. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 3,471