SWE-bench-Live
Agents resolve recent GitHub issues gathered by an automated pipeline, with 50 new verified Python tasks added each month. Tests in a docker sandbox check each patch.
MultiLang (January 2026, 1,077 tasks in 8 languages by August 2026) and Windows (March 2026) splits have their own leaderboards. Scores depend on the snapshot month.
In the authors’ words
The issue-resolving task, where a model generates patches to fix real-world bugs, has emerged as a critical benchmark for evaluating the capabilities of large language models (LLMs). While SWE-bench and its variants have become standard in this domain, they suffer from key limitations: they have not been updated since their initial releases, cover a narrow set of repositories, and depend heavily on manual effort for instance construction and environment setup. These factors hinder scalability and introduce risks of overfitting and data contamination. In this work, we present SWE-bench-Live, a live-updatable benchmark designed to overcome these challenges. Our initial release consists of 1,319 tasks derived from real GitHub issues created since 2024, spanning 93 repositories. Each task is accompanied by a dedicated Docker image to ensure reproducible execution. Central to our benchmark is \method, an automated curation pipeline that streamlines the entire process from instance creation to environment setup, removing manual bottlenecks and enabling scalability and continuous updates. We evaluate a range of state-of-the-art agent frameworks and LLMs on SWE-bench-Live, revealing a substantial performance gap compared to static benchmarks like SWE-bench, even under controlled evaluation conditions. To better understand this discrepancy, we perform detailed analyses across repository origin, issue recency, and task difficulty. By providing a fresh, diverse, and executable benchmark grounded in live repository activity, SWE-bench-Live facilitates rigorous, contamination-resistant evaluation of LLMs and agents in dynamic, real-world software development settings.
- Level
- Expert Specialists with years of training, often over hours of work
- Scored
- Checked automatically A program checks the result against an answer key, unit tests or the expected final state.
- Answers
- Code A program or patch run against tests.
Claude Opus 5.5 leads with 71.7%
Best score per entry from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on 2 Nov 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Names in gray aren't in our model list: fine-tunes, agent systems, products and older models. They don't count toward leaders.
- 1 Claude Opus 5.5 xhigh 71.7%
- 2
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 71%
- 3 GPT-5.6 Sol 70.3%
- 4 Claude Opus 4.6 63%
- 5 GPT-5.5 medium 62%
- 6 Claude Sonnet 4.5 36%
- 7 Claude Opus 4.8 xhigh 34%
- 8
Qwen3-Coder-480B-A35B 24.7%
- 9 GPT-5 medium 24.3%
- 10 Seed-OSS-36B 20%
- 11 Claude 3.7 Sonnet 17.7%
- 12 GPT-4.1 16.3%
- 13
DeepSeek-V3 Mar 2025 15.3%
- 14 GPT-4o Mar 2025 11.7%
| # | Entry | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Claude Opus 5.5 | 71.7% | xhigh, AiWork.Code | Sep 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 2 | | 71% | TianxiCode | Sep 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 3 | GPT-5.6 Sol | 70.3% | Slingshot-v3.4.0 | Jul 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 4 | Claude Opus 4.6 | 63% | AMI Agent | Feb 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 5 | GPT-5.5 | 62% | medium, agav-agent | Apr 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 6 | Claude Sonnet 4.5 | 36% | SWE-agent | Sep 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 7 | Claude Opus 4.8 | 34% | xhigh, AiWork.Code | May 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 8 | | 24.7% | OpenHands | Jul 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 9 | GPT-5 | 24.3% | medium, SWE-agent | Aug 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 10 | Seed-OSS-36B | 20% | MIT-IBM Agent (BOAD) + SWE-Agent | Dec 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 11 | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | 17.7% | SWE-agent | Feb 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 12 | GPT-4.1 | 16.3% | SWE-agent | Apr 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 13 | | 15.3% | SWE-agent | Mar 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 14 | GPT-4o Mar 2025 | 11.7% | Agentless | Mar 2025 | Official leaderboard |
Labs report scores for 1 model in their cards. We plot every source in the charts below.
7 models have held number one since its release in May 2025
Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.
Scores over time
All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.
No launch post has listed it since Jul 2025
Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.
| Date | Launch post | Score | As the post writes it |
|---|---|---|---|
| 22 Jul 2025 | 26.3 | SWE-bench Live |
More in Coding
- SWE-bench Verified In use 500 human-validated GitHub issues from 12 Python repos. Agent writes a patch that must pass hidden tests. Claude Opus 4.7 83.5%
- SWE-bench Multilingual In use 300 GitHub-issue tasks across nine programming languages in SWE-bench format. Patch graded by repository tests. Claude Opus 5.5 93.9%
- LiveCodeBench v6 In use Competitive programming problems collected after model cutoffs from LeetCode, AtCoder, Codeforces. Scored pass@1 on hidden tests.
DeepSeek-V4-Pro 93.5%
- DeepSWE In use 113 original long-horizon engineering tasks across 91 repos and five languages, written from scratch. Hand-written verifiers accept alternative solutions. GPT-6 Astra 74.1%
- SciCode In use Scientist-curated research coding problems split into subproblems across natural sciences. Code checked against test cases.
Seed2.1 Pro 59.8%
- Codeforces rating In use Model solves recent Codeforces contest problems. An Elo-style rating is computed from simulated contest performance.
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 3,471