Benchmark Almanac

SWE-bench Lite

Claude Sonnet 4 60.3% leads since May 2025 Not in model cards

Models resolve 300 self-contained GitHub issues chosen from SWE-bench to cut evaluation cost. Hidden repository tests decide each patch.

Widely used by agent papers in 2024 before SWE-bench Verified took over.

In the authors’ words

Language models have outpaced our ability to evaluate them effectively, but for their future development it is essential to study the frontier of their capabilities. We find real-world software engineering to be a rich, sustainable, and challenging testbed for evaluating the next generation of language models. To this end, we introduce SWE-bench, an evaluation framework consisting of 2,294 software engineering problems drawn from real GitHub issues and corresponding pull requests across 12 popular Python repositories. Given a codebase along with a description of an issue to be resolved, a language model is tasked with editing the codebase to address the issue. Resolving issues in SWE-bench frequently requires understanding and coordinating changes across multiple functions, classes, and even files simultaneously, calling for models to interact with execution environments, process extremely long contexts and perform complex reasoning that goes far beyond traditional code generation tasks. Our evaluations show that both state-of-the-art proprietary models and our fine-tuned model SWE-Llama can resolve only the simplest issues. The best-performing model, Claude 2, is able to solve a mere 1.96% of the issues. Advances on SWE-bench represent steps towards LMs that are more practical, intelligent, and autonomous.

Abstract of SWE-bench: Can Language Models Resolve Real-World GitHub Issues? (arXiv:2310.06770, CC0)
Made by Princeton University (SWE-bench team) Released Mar 2024 Fixing real repositories All tasks public Last model added Jul 2025 Scores refreshed 2 Nov 2026
Level
Expert Specialists with years of training, often over hours of work
Scored
Checked automatically A program checks the result against an answer key, unit tests or the expected final state.
Answers
Code A program or patch run against tests.
26
Entries on its own leaderboard, 15 models we track

Claude Sonnet 4 leads with 60.3% among models released by Jul 2025

Best score per entry from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on 2 Nov 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Names in gray aren't in our model list: fine-tunes, agent systems, products and older models. They don't count toward leaders.

The newest model with a score here came out in Jul 2025, and nobody has tested a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:

  1. 1 Claude Sonnet 4 60.3%
  2. 2 Undisclosed 55%
  3. 3 Claude 3.5 Sonnet 51.3%
  4. 4 Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct 49.7%
  5. 5 Claude 3.7 Sonnet 48%
  6. 6 Mixed Models 43%
  7. 7 CodeAct v2.1 (claude-3-5-sonnet-20241022) 41.7%
  8. 8 GPT-4 (0806) 39.7%
  9. 9 GPT-4o May 2024 38%
  10. 10 DeepSeek-V3 Mar 2025 36.7%
  11. 11 o3-mini 32.3%
  12. 12 GPT-4o Aug 2024 32%
  13. 13 DeepSeek-V3 30.7%
  14. 14 o3-mini_1.0 30.3%
  15. 15 GPT-4 Turbo Nov 2023 28.3%
  16. 16 CodeAct v1.8 26.7%
  17. 17 GPT-4o & Claude 3 Opus 26.3%
  18. 18 Qwen2.5 (7B + 72B) 24.7%
  19. 19 GPT-4 Jun 2023 23.7%
  20. 20 GPT-4 (0125) 19%
  21. 21 MCTS Refine 7B 16.3%
  22. 22 Claude 3 Opus 11.7%
  23. 23 Claude 2 3.00%
  24. 24 SWE-Llama 7B 1.33%
  25. 25 SWE-Llama 13B 1.00%
  26. 26 GPT-3.5 0.33%
#EntryScoreSettingDateSource
1 Claude Sonnet 4 60.3% ExpeRepair-v1.0 May 2025 Official leaderboard
2 Undisclosed 55% Isoform Jan 2025 Official leaderboard
3 Claude 3.5 Sonnet 51.3% Isea Jun 2024 Official leaderboard
4 Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct 49.7% EntroPO + R2E Jul 2025 Official leaderboard
5 Claude 3.7 Sonnet 48% SWE-agent Feb 2025 Official leaderboard
6 Mixed Models 43% CodeStory Aide Jul 2024 Official leaderboard
7 CodeAct v2.1 (claude-3-5-sonnet-20241022) 41.7% OpenHands Oct 2024 Official leaderboard
8 GPT-4 (0806) 39.7% OpenCSG Starship Agentic Coder Jan 2025 Official leaderboard
9 GPT-4o May 2024 38% AbanteAI MentatBot May 2024 Official leaderboard
10 DeepSeek-V3 Mar 2025 36.7% KGCompass Mar 2025 Official leaderboard
11 o3-mini 32.3% Agentless Lite Jan 2025 Official leaderboard
12 GPT-4o Aug 2024 32% Agentless-1.5 Aug 2024 Official leaderboard
13 DeepSeek-V3 30.7% Moatless Tools Dec 2024 Official leaderboard
14 o3-mini_1.0 30.3% Aegis Feb 2025 Official leaderboard
15 GPT-4 Turbo Nov 2023 28.3% CodeR Nov 2023 Official leaderboard
16 CodeAct v1.8 26.7% OpenHands Jul 2024 Official leaderboard
17 GPT-4o & Claude 3 Opus 26.3% Aider May 2024 Official leaderboard
18 Qwen2.5 (7B + 72B) 24.7% SWE-Fixer Mar 2025 Official leaderboard
19 GPT-4 Jun 2023 23.7% OpenCSG StarShip CodeGenAgent Jun 2023 Official leaderboard
20 GPT-4 (0125) 19% AutoCodeRover May 2024 Official leaderboard
21 MCTS Refine 7B 16.3% MCTS-Refine-7B Jun 2025 Official leaderboard
22 Claude 3 Opus 11.7% SWE-agent Feb 2024 Official leaderboard
23 Claude 2 3.00% RAG baseline Jul 2023 Official leaderboard
24 SWE-Llama 7B 1.33% RAG baseline Oct 2023 Official leaderboard
25 SWE-Llama 13B 1.00% RAG baseline Oct 2023 Official leaderboard
26 GPT-3.5 0.33% RAG baseline Oct 2023 Official leaderboard

4 models have held number one since its release in Mar 2024

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.

OpenAI Anthropic
Own leaderboard Not tested since Jul 2025

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

On the benchmark’s own leaderboard Best so far
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2023 2024 2025 Near the ceiling (85%) Claude Sonnet 4 Claude 3.5 Sonnet GPT-4o GPT-4 Turbo GPT-4 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2023 2024 2025 Near the ceiling (85%) Claude Sonnet 4 Claude 3.5 Sonnet

No lab model card reports it yet

We read the headline results of 479 launch posts from 51 labs, and none of them list this benchmark.

More in Coding

All 243 in Coding
  • SWE-bench Verified In use 500 human-validated GitHub issues from 12 Python repos. Agent writes a patch that must pass hidden tests. Claude Opus 4.7 83.5%
  • SWE-bench Multilingual In use 300 GitHub-issue tasks across nine programming languages in SWE-bench format. Patch graded by repository tests. Claude Opus 5.5 93.9%
  • LiveCodeBench v6 In use Competitive programming problems collected after model cutoffs from LeetCode, AtCoder, Codeforces. Scored pass@1 on hidden tests. DeepSeek-V4-Pro 93.5%
  • DeepSWE In use 113 original long-horizon engineering tasks across 91 repos and five languages, written from scratch. Hand-written verifiers accept alternative solutions. GPT-6 Astra 74.1%
  • SciCode In use Scientist-curated research coding problems split into subproblems across natural sciences. Code checked against test cases. Seed2.1 Pro 59.8%
  • Codeforces rating In use Model solves recent Codeforces contest problems. An Elo-style rating is computed from simulated contest performance. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 3,471