SWE-bench Lite
Models resolve 300 self-contained GitHub issues chosen from SWE-bench to cut evaluation cost. Hidden repository tests decide each patch.
Widely used by agent papers in 2024 before SWE-bench Verified took over.
In the authors’ words
Language models have outpaced our ability to evaluate them effectively, but for their future development it is essential to study the frontier of their capabilities. We find real-world software engineering to be a rich, sustainable, and challenging testbed for evaluating the next generation of language models. To this end, we introduce SWE-bench, an evaluation framework consisting of 2,294 software engineering problems drawn from real GitHub issues and corresponding pull requests across 12 popular Python repositories. Given a codebase along with a description of an issue to be resolved, a language model is tasked with editing the codebase to address the issue. Resolving issues in SWE-bench frequently requires understanding and coordinating changes across multiple functions, classes, and even files simultaneously, calling for models to interact with execution environments, process extremely long contexts and perform complex reasoning that goes far beyond traditional code generation tasks. Our evaluations show that both state-of-the-art proprietary models and our fine-tuned model SWE-Llama can resolve only the simplest issues. The best-performing model, Claude 2, is able to solve a mere 1.96% of the issues. Advances on SWE-bench represent steps towards LMs that are more practical, intelligent, and autonomous.
- Level
- Expert Specialists with years of training, often over hours of work
- Scored
- Checked automatically A program checks the result against an answer key, unit tests or the expected final state.
- Answers
- Code A program or patch run against tests.
Claude Sonnet 4 leads with 60.3% among models released by Jul 2025
Best score per entry from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on 2 Nov 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Names in gray aren't in our model list: fine-tunes, agent systems, products and older models. They don't count toward leaders.
The newest model with a score here came out in Jul 2025, and nobody has tested a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:
- GPT-6 Astra
- Claude Opus 5.5
- GPT-6.1 Terra
- GPT-6.1 Sol
- and 16 more
- 60.3 Claude Sonnet 4
- 55.0 Undisclosed
- 51.3 Claude 3.5 Sonnet
- 49.7
Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- 48.0 Claude 3.7 Sonnet
- 43.0 Mixed Models
- 41.7 CodeAct v2.1 (claude-3-5-sonnet-20241022)
- 39.7 GPT-4 (0806)
- 38.0 GPT-4o
- 36.7
DeepSeek-V3
- 32.3 o3-mini
- 32.0 GPT-4o
- 30.7
DeepSeek-V3
- 30.3 o3-mini_1.0
- 28.3 GPT-4 Turbo
- 26.7 CodeAct v1.8
- 26.3 GPT-4o & Claude 3 Opus
- 24.7 Qwen2.5 (7B + 72B)
- 23.7 GPT-4
- 19.0 GPT-4 (0125)
- 16.3 MCTS Refine 7B
- 11.7 Claude 3 Opus
- 3.00 Claude 2
- 1.33
SWE-Llama 7B
- 1.00
SWE-Llama 13B
- 0.33 GPT-3.5
- 1 Claude Sonnet 4 60.3%
- 2 Undisclosed 55%
- 3 Claude 3.5 Sonnet 51.3%
- 4
Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct 49.7%
- 5 Claude 3.7 Sonnet 48%
- 6 Mixed Models 43%
- 7 CodeAct v2.1 (claude-3-5-sonnet-20241022) 41.7%
- 8 GPT-4 (0806) 39.7%
- 9 GPT-4o May 2024 38%
- 10
DeepSeek-V3 Mar 2025 36.7%
- 11 o3-mini 32.3%
- 12 GPT-4o Aug 2024 32%
- 13
DeepSeek-V3 30.7%
- 14 o3-mini_1.0 30.3%
- 15 GPT-4 Turbo Nov 2023 28.3%
- 16 CodeAct v1.8 26.7%
- 17 GPT-4o & Claude 3 Opus 26.3%
- 18 Qwen2.5 (7B + 72B) 24.7%
- 19 GPT-4 Jun 2023 23.7%
- 20 GPT-4 (0125) 19%
- 21 MCTS Refine 7B 16.3%
- 22 Claude 3 Opus 11.7%
- 23 Claude 2 3.00%
- 24
SWE-Llama 7B 1.33%
- 25
SWE-Llama 13B 1.00%
- 26 GPT-3.5 0.33%
| # | Entry | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Claude Sonnet 4 | 60.3% | ExpeRepair-v1.0 | May 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 2 | Undisclosed | 55% | Isoform | Jan 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 3 | Claude 3.5 Sonnet | 51.3% | Isea | Jun 2024 | Official leaderboard |
| 4 | | 49.7% | EntroPO + R2E | Jul 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 5 | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | 48% | SWE-agent | Feb 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 6 | Mixed Models | 43% | CodeStory Aide | Jul 2024 | Official leaderboard |
| 7 | CodeAct v2.1 (claude-3-5-sonnet-20241022) | 41.7% | OpenHands | Oct 2024 | Official leaderboard |
| 8 | GPT-4 (0806) | 39.7% | OpenCSG Starship Agentic Coder | Jan 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 9 | GPT-4o May 2024 | 38% | AbanteAI MentatBot | May 2024 | Official leaderboard |
| 10 | | 36.7% | KGCompass | Mar 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 11 | o3-mini | 32.3% | Agentless Lite | Jan 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 12 | GPT-4o Aug 2024 | 32% | Agentless-1.5 | Aug 2024 | Official leaderboard |
| 13 | | 30.7% | Moatless Tools | Dec 2024 | Official leaderboard |
| 14 | o3-mini_1.0 | 30.3% | Aegis | Feb 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 15 | GPT-4 Turbo Nov 2023 | 28.3% | CodeR | Nov 2023 | Official leaderboard |
| 16 | CodeAct v1.8 | 26.7% | OpenHands | Jul 2024 | Official leaderboard |
| 17 | GPT-4o & Claude 3 Opus | 26.3% | Aider | May 2024 | Official leaderboard |
| 18 | Qwen2.5 (7B + 72B) | 24.7% | SWE-Fixer | Mar 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 19 | GPT-4 Jun 2023 | 23.7% | OpenCSG StarShip CodeGenAgent | Jun 2023 | Official leaderboard |
| 20 | GPT-4 (0125) | 19% | AutoCodeRover | May 2024 | Official leaderboard |
| 21 | MCTS Refine 7B | 16.3% | MCTS-Refine-7B | Jun 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 22 | Claude 3 Opus | 11.7% | SWE-agent | Feb 2024 | Official leaderboard |
| 23 | Claude 2 | 3.00% | RAG baseline | Jul 2023 | Official leaderboard |
| 24 | | 1.33% | RAG baseline | Oct 2023 | Official leaderboard |
| 25 | | 1.00% | RAG baseline | Oct 2023 | Official leaderboard |
| 26 | GPT-3.5 | 0.33% | RAG baseline | Oct 2023 | Official leaderboard |
4 models have held number one since its release in Mar 2024
Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.
Scores over time
All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.
No lab model card reports it yet
We read the headline results of 479 launch posts from 51 labs, and none of them list this benchmark.
More in Coding
- SWE-bench Verified In use 500 human-validated GitHub issues from 12 Python repos. Agent writes a patch that must pass hidden tests. Claude Opus 4.7 83.5%
- SWE-bench Multilingual In use 300 GitHub-issue tasks across nine programming languages in SWE-bench format. Patch graded by repository tests. Claude Opus 5.5 93.9%
- LiveCodeBench v6 In use Competitive programming problems collected after model cutoffs from LeetCode, AtCoder, Codeforces. Scored pass@1 on hidden tests.
DeepSeek-V4-Pro 93.5%
- DeepSWE In use 113 original long-horizon engineering tasks across 91 repos and five languages, written from scratch. Hand-written verifiers accept alternative solutions. GPT-6 Astra 74.1%
- SciCode In use Scientist-curated research coding problems split into subproblems across natural sciences. Code checked against test cases.
Seed2.1 Pro 59.8%
- Codeforces rating In use Model solves recent Codeforces contest problems. An Elo-style rating is computed from simulated contest performance.
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 3,471