Benchmark Almanac

SuperCLUE-Safety

BlueLM 92.5 tops its leaderboard Yi-34B 89.3 leads the models we track Not in model cards

Chinese language models answer 4,912 open-ended safety questions over more than 20 sub-dimensions in multi-round adversarial dialogues. Follow-up turns push harder than the first prompt.

Built after China's generative AI rules took effect on 2023-08-15. The paper tested 13 models. The board last added models on 2024-01-04.

In the authors’ words

Large language models (LLMs), like ChatGPT and GPT-4, have demonstrated remarkable abilities in natural language understanding and generation. However, alongside their positive impact on our daily tasks, they can also produce harmful content that negatively affects societal perceptions. To systematically assess the safety of Chinese LLMs, we introduce SuperCLUE-Safety (SC-Safety) - a multi-round adversarial benchmark with 4912 open-ended questions covering more than 20 safety sub-dimensions. Adversarial human-model interactions and conversations significantly increase the challenges compared to existing methods. Experiments on 13 major LLMs supporting Chinese yield the following insights: 1) Closed-source models outperform open-sourced ones in terms of safety; 2) Models released from China demonstrate comparable safety levels to LLMs like GPT-3.5-turbo; 3) Some smaller models with 6B-13B parameters can compete effectively in terms of safety. By introducing SC-Safety, we aim to promote collaborative efforts to create safer and more trustworthy LLMs. The benchmark and findings provide guidance on model selection. Our benchmark can be found at https://www.CLUEbenchmarks.com

Abstract of SC-Safety: A Multi-round Open-ended Question Adversarial Safety Benchmark for Large Language Models in Chinese (arXiv:2310.05818, CC0)
Made by CLUE benchmark team (SuperCLUE) Released Sep 2023 Jailbreaks and prompt injection Tasks kept private Last model added Nov 2023 Scores refreshed 2 Nov 2026
Level
Everyday Most adults, without training
Scored
Graded by a model A language model scores each response, usually against a rubric.
Answers
Open-ended Free-form text, documents, designs or media judged as a whole.
19
Entries on its own leaderboard, 7 models we track

BlueLM tops the leaderboard with 92.5

Best score per entry from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on 2 Nov 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Names in gray aren't in our model list: fine-tunes, agent systems, products and older models. They don't count toward leaders. The best model we track is Yi-34B, at 89.3.

The newest model with a score here came out in Nov 2023, and nobody has tested a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:

  1. 1 BlueLM 92.5
  2. 2 AndesGPT 90.9
  3. 3 Yi-34B 89.3
  4. 4 文心一言4.0 88.9
  5. 5 GPT-4 Jun 2023 87.4
  6. 6 讯飞星火(v3.0) 86.2
  7. 7 360gpt-pro 85.3
  8. 8 讯飞星火(v2.0) 85.0
  9. 9 GPT-3.5 Turbo Jun 2023 83.8
  10. 10 文心一言3.5 81.2
  11. 11 ChatGLM2-Pro 79.8
  12. 12 chatglm2-6b 79.4
  13. 13 Baichuan2-13B-Chat 78.8
  14. 14 Qwen-7B 78.6
  15. 15 OpenBuddy-Llama2-70B 78.2
  16. 16 Llama 2-13B 77.5
  17. 17 360GPT_S2_V94 76.5
  18. 18 Chinese-Alpaca2-13B 75.4
  19. 19 MiniMax-Abab5.5 71.9
#EntryScoreSettingDateSource
1 BlueLM 92.5 Oct 2023 Official leaderboard
2 AndesGPT 90.9 Oct 2023 Official leaderboard
3 Yi-34B 89.3 Nov 2023 Official leaderboard
4 文心一言4.0 88.9 Oct 2023 Official leaderboard
5 GPT-4 Jun 2023 87.4 Jun 2023 Official leaderboard
6 讯飞星火(v3.0) 86.2 Oct 2023 Official leaderboard
7 360gpt-pro 85.3 Oct 2023 Official leaderboard
8 讯飞星火(v2.0) 85.0 Oct 2023 Official leaderboard
9 GPT-3.5 Turbo Jun 2023 83.8 Jun 2023 Official leaderboard
10 文心一言3.5 81.2 Oct 2023 Official leaderboard
11 ChatGLM2-Pro 79.8 Oct 2023 Official leaderboard
12 chatglm2-6b 79.4 Jun 2023 Official leaderboard
13 Baichuan2-13B-Chat 78.8 Sep 2023 Official leaderboard
14 Qwen-7B 78.6 Sep 2023 Official leaderboard
15 OpenBuddy-Llama2-70B 78.2 Oct 2023 Official leaderboard
16 Llama 2-13B 77.5 Jul 2023 Official leaderboard
17 360GPT_S2_V94 76.5 Oct 2023 Official leaderboard
18 Chinese-Alpaca2-13B 75.4 Oct 2023 Official leaderboard
19 MiniMax-Abab5.5 71.9 Oct 2023 Official leaderboard

2 models have held number one since its release in Sep 2023

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.

OpenAI 01.AI
Own leaderboard Not tested since Nov 2023
Yi-34B 89.3

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

On the benchmark’s own leaderboard
75.0 80.0 85.0 90.0 2023 2024 75.0 80.0 85.0 90.0 2023 2024

No lab model card reports it yet

We read the headline results of 479 launch posts from 51 labs, and none of them list this benchmark.

More in Safety and alignment

All 444 in Safety and alignment
  • FORTRESS In use Paired adversarial and benign national-security misuse prompts. Rubric-graded risk score on adversarial and over-refusal score on benign prompts. Claude Opus 5.5 5.78%
  • StrongREJECT In use Forbidden-prompt jailbreak benchmark with a rubric grader that scores how useful a non-refusal actually is. Inkling 98.6%
  • AgentDojo In use Agents do tool-use tasks while tools and data carry prompt injections. Attack success rate counts hijacked runs. Grok 4 Fast 0%
  • MASK In use Measures whether a model contradicts its own elicited beliefs under pressure to lie. Honesty separated from accuracy. Muse Spark Open 98.1%
  • Gray Swan IPI Arena benchmark In use Indirect prompt-injection attacks from public red-teaming competitions replayed on tool, coding and browser agents. Attack success rate at k attempts. GPT-6 Astra 8.50%
  • Agentic misalignment suite (Anthropic) In use Agents in simulated company settings face threats or goal conflicts that invite blackmail, leaking or sabotage. Score is the misaligned action rate. Claude Sonnet 4.5 0%