Benchmark Almanac

StructEval

Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite 81.2% leads since Mar 2026 In use

Models generate or convert structured outputs in 18 formats, such as JSON, TOML and HTML. StructEval-T covers text-only formats and StructEval-V renderable ones.

2,035 examples over 44 task types. Published in TMLR in January 2026.

In the authors’ words

As Large Language Models (LLMs) become integral to software development workflows, their ability to generate structured outputs has become critically important. We introduce StructEval, a comprehensive benchmark for evaluating LLMs' capabilities in producing both non-renderable (JSON, YAML, CSV) and renderable (HTML, React, SVG) structured formats. Unlike prior benchmarks, StructEval systematically evaluates structural fidelity across diverse formats through two paradigms: 1) generation tasks, producing structured output from natural language prompts, and 2) conversion tasks, translating between structured formats. Our benchmark encompasses 18 formats and 44 types of task, with novel metrics for format adherence and structural correctness. Results reveal significant performance gaps-even state-of-the-art models like o1-mini achieve only 75.58 average score, with open-source alternatives lagging approximately 10 points behind. We find generation tasks more challenging than conversion tasks, and producing correct visual content more difficult than generating text-only structures.

Abstract of StructEval: Benchmarking LLMs' Capabilities to Generate Structural Outputs (arXiv:2505.20139, CC0)
Made by TIGER-AI-Lab (Yang, Jiang et al.) Released May 2025 Data science and SQL All tasks public Last in a launch post Oct 2026 Last model added Oct 2026 Scores refreshed 2 Nov 2026
Level
Everyday Most adults, without training
Scored
Checked automatically A program checks the result against an answer key, unit tests or the expected final state.
Answers
Code A program or patch run against tests.
33
Entries on its own leaderboard, 28 models we track
1
Launch post lists it, from 1 lab
1
System card reports it, from 1 lab

Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite leads with 81.2%

Best score per entry from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on 2 Nov 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Names in gray aren't in our model list: fine-tunes, agent systems, products and older models. They don't count toward leaders.

  1. 1 Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite 81.2%
  2. 2 Gemini 3.8 Flash 80.6%
  3. 3 MiMo-V2.6 Flash 79.6%
  4. 4 DeepSeek-V4-Flash 78.3%
  5. 5 Gemma 4 31B IT 77.5%
  6. 6 Kimi K2.5 77.3%
  7. 7 DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus 77.2%
  8. 8 Tencent Hy3 76.9%
  9. 9 Qwen3.7-Plus 76.8%
  10. 10 GLM-5.3-Flash 76.2%
  11. 11 GPT-4.1 mini 76.1%
  12. 12 GPT-4o May 2024 76%
  13. 13 o1-mini 75.6%
  14. 14 DeepSeek-V3.2 75.5%
  15. 15 Nemotron 3 Ultra 74.3%
  16. 16 GPT-4o mini 73.2%
  17. 17 Qwen3.5 9B (Ollama) 73%
  18. 18 Mistral Small 4 72.5%
  19. 19 Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Jun 2025 72%
  20. 20 Gemini 1.5 Pro Feb 2024 71.8%
  21. 21 Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct Jul 2025 71.6%
  22. 22 GPT-5.4 Nano 69.8%
  23. 23 Gemma 4 26B A4B 68.9%
  24. 24 Qwen3 8B (Ollama) 67.5%
  25. 25 Gemma 2 9B (Ollama) 67.3%
  26. 26 Qwen3-4B 67%
  27. 27 Gemini 2.0 Flash Feb 2025 62.5%
  28. 28 Llama 3.1-8B 61.8%
  29. 29 Phi-4 Mini 57%
  30. 30 Gemma3 4B (Ollama) 57%
  31. 31 Qwen2.5 7B Instruct (Ollama) 53.1%
  32. 32 Llama 3-8B 51.6%
  33. 33 Phi-3-mini-128k-instruct 40.8%
#EntryScoreSettingDateSource
1 Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite 81.2% Mar 2026 Official leaderboard
2 Gemini 3.8 Flash 80.6% Sep 2026 Official leaderboard
3 MiMo-V2.6 Flash 79.6% Sep 2026 Official leaderboard
4 DeepSeek-V4-Flash 78.3% Apr 2026 Official leaderboard
5 Gemma 4 31B IT 77.5% Apr 2026 Official leaderboard
6 Kimi K2.5 77.3% Jan 2026 Official leaderboard
7 DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus 77.2% Sep 2025 Official leaderboard
8 Tencent Hy3 76.9% Jul 2026 Official leaderboard
9 Qwen3.7-Plus 76.8% Jun 2026 Official leaderboard
10 GLM-5.3-Flash 76.2% Aug 2026 Official leaderboard
11 GPT-4.1 mini 76.1% Apr 2025 Official leaderboard
12 GPT-4o May 2024 76% May 2024 Official leaderboard
13 o1-mini 75.6% Sep 2024 Official leaderboard
14 DeepSeek-V3.2 75.5% Dec 2025 Official leaderboard
15 Nemotron 3 Ultra 74.3% Jun 2026 Official leaderboard
16 GPT-4o mini 73.2% Jul 2024 Official leaderboard
17 Qwen3.5 9B (Ollama) 73% Mar 2026 Official leaderboard
18 Mistral Small 4 72.5% Mar 2026 Official leaderboard
19 Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Jun 2025 72% Jun 2025 Official leaderboard
20 Gemini 1.5 Pro Feb 2024 71.8% Feb 2024 Official leaderboard
21 Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct Jul 2025 71.6% Jul 2025 Official leaderboard
22 GPT-5.4 Nano 69.8% Mar 2026 Official leaderboard
23 Gemma 4 26B A4B 68.9% Apr 2026 Official leaderboard
24 Qwen3 8B (Ollama) 67.5% Apr 2025 Official leaderboard
25 Gemma 2 9B (Ollama) 67.3% Jun 2024 Official leaderboard
26 Qwen3-4B 67% Apr 2025 Official leaderboard
27 Gemini 2.0 Flash Feb 2025 62.5% Feb 2025 Official leaderboard
28 Llama 3.1-8B 61.8% Jul 2024 Official leaderboard
29 Phi-4 Mini 57% Feb 2025 Official leaderboard
30 Gemma3 4B (Ollama) 57% Mar 2025 Official leaderboard
31 Qwen2.5 7B Instruct (Ollama) 53.1% Sep 2024 Official leaderboard
32 Llama 3-8B 51.6% Apr 2024 Official leaderboard
33 Phi-3-mini-128k-instruct 40.8% Apr 2024 Official leaderboard

Labs report scores for 1 model in their cards. We plot every source in the charts below.

4 models have held number one since its release in May 2025

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.

OpenAI DeepSeek Moonshot AI Google DeepMind
Own leaderboard 4 leaders

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

On the benchmark’s own leaderboard Reported by the lab in its model card Best so far
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2024 2025 2026 2027 Near the ceiling (85%) Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite GPT-4.1 mini GPT-4o Gemini 1.5 Pro 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2024 2025 2026 2027 Near the ceiling (85%) Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite GPT-4o

One lab put it in a launch post in the last six months

Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.

NVIDIA
DateLaunch postScoreAs the post writes it
23 Oct 2026 Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 80 StructEval-T

One system card reports it

Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.

DateDocumentScoreAs the document writes itSection
23 Oct 2026 Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B technical report 80 StructEval-T, released Q4_K_M imatrix checkpoint (Table 5). BF16 80.4 (Table 3) Capabilities

More in Coding

All 243 in Coding
  • SWE-bench Verified In use 500 human-validated GitHub issues from 12 Python repos. Agent writes a patch that must pass hidden tests. Claude Opus 4.7 83.5%
  • SWE-bench Multilingual In use 300 GitHub-issue tasks across nine programming languages in SWE-bench format. Patch graded by repository tests. Claude Opus 5.5 93.9%
  • LiveCodeBench v6 In use Competitive programming problems collected after model cutoffs from LeetCode, AtCoder, Codeforces. Scored pass@1 on hidden tests. DeepSeek-V4-Pro 93.5%
  • DeepSWE In use 113 original long-horizon engineering tasks across 91 repos and five languages, written from scratch. Hand-written verifiers accept alternative solutions. GPT-6 Astra 74.1%
  • SciCode In use Scientist-curated research coding problems split into subproblems across natural sciences. Code checked against test cases. Seed2.1 Pro 59.8%
  • Codeforces rating In use Model solves recent Codeforces contest problems. An Elo-style rating is computed from simulated contest performance. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 3,471