Benchmark Almanac

StrongREJECT v2 (Meta)

Muse Spark 1.1 0.50% leads since Jul 2026 In use

Models face a cascade of jailbreak attacks on disallowed behaviors adapted from StrongREJECT plus internal ones. Reports attack success rate.

Meta variant of public StrongREJECT with internally curated behaviors and a multi-turn LLM attacker.

Made by Meta Jailbreaks and prompt injection Tasks kept private Last in a launch post Oct 2026 Last model added Oct 2026
Level
Expert Specialists with years of training, often over hours of work
Scored
Graded by a model A language model scores each response, usually against a rubric.
Answers
Open-ended Free-form text, documents, designs or media judged as a whole.
4
Models scored in lab cards
1
Launch post lists it, from 1 lab
3
System cards report it, from 1 lab

3 models share the top score of 0.50%

Best score per model as labs report them in their own cards. Labs pick their own settings, so these compare less cleanly than independent runs.

  1. 1 Muse Spark 1.1 0.50%
  2. 2 Muse Spark Open 0.50%
  3. 3 Muse Spark 1.3 0.50%
  4. 4 Muse Spark 44.6%
#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 Muse Spark 1.1 0.50% Jul 2026 Model card
2 Muse Spark Open 0.50% Oct 2026 Model card
3 Muse Spark 1.3 0.50% Oct 2026 Model card
4 Muse Spark 44.6% Jun 2026 Model card

2 models have held number one since 2023

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.

Meta
Lab claims 2 leaders

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

Reported by the lab in its model card Best so far
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2026 2027 Muse Spark 1.1 Muse Spark 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2026 2027 Muse Spark 1.1 Muse Spark

One lab put it in a launch post in the last six months

Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.

Meta
DateLaunch postScoreAs the post writes it
15 Oct 2026 Muse Spark Open 0.5 StrongREJECT v2 (adaptive), lower is better

3 system cards report it, from 1 lab

Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.

DateDocumentScoreAs the document writes itSection
23 Oct 2026 Muse Spark 1.3 system card 0.5 StrongREJECT v2 ASR averaged over single-turn and multi-turn, Muse Spark 1.3 (API) max (Table 2, Figure 21) Robustness
9 Jul 2026 Muse Spark 1.1 system card 0.5 StrongREJECT v2 ASR (Table 2 scorecard, Figure 24) Robustness
12 Jun 2026 Muse Spark system card 44.6 StrongREJECT v2 ASR at end of cascaded attack pipeline, Muse Spark (Table 2, Figure 27) Robustness

More in Safety and alignment

All 444 in Safety and alignment
  • FORTRESS In use Paired adversarial and benign national-security misuse prompts. Rubric-graded risk score on adversarial and over-refusal score on benign prompts. Claude Opus 5.5 5.78%
  • StrongREJECT In use Forbidden-prompt jailbreak benchmark with a rubric grader that scores how useful a non-refusal actually is. Inkling 98.6%
  • AgentDojo In use Agents do tool-use tasks while tools and data carry prompt injections. Attack success rate counts hijacked runs. Grok 4 Fast 0%
  • MASK In use Measures whether a model contradicts its own elicited beliefs under pressure to lie. Honesty separated from accuracy. Muse Spark Open 98.1%
  • Gray Swan IPI Arena benchmark In use Indirect prompt-injection attacks from public red-teaming competitions replayed on tool, coding and browser agents. Attack success rate at k attempts. GPT-6 Astra 8.50%
  • Agentic misalignment suite (Anthropic) In use Agents in simulated company settings face threats or goal conflicts that invite blackmail, leaking or sabotage. Score is the misaligned action rate. Claude Sonnet 4.5 0%