STaRK
Retrieval systems find the right items for complex queries over knowledge bases that mix free text with relations between entities. The three domains are product search, academic paper search and precision medicine. Most queries are synthesized and checked by people, and a smaller set is written by people.
Entries are retrieval systems, many built on language-model embeddings or rerankers, not chat models. Results report ranking metrics such as Hit@1 and MRR. About 340 GitHub stars.
- Made by
- Stanford University (SNAP group) and collaborators
- Released
- April 2024
- Kind
- Questions that need search
- Level
- University
- Scored
- Checked automatically
- Answers
- Short answer
- Tasks
- All public
In the authors’ words
Answering real-world complex queries, such as complex product search, often requires accurate retrieval from semi-structured knowledge bases that involve blend of unstructured (e.g., textual descriptions of products) and structured (e.g., entity relations of products) information. However, many previous works studied textual and relational retrieval tasks as separate topics. To address the gap, we develop STARK, a large-scale Semi-structure retrieval benchmark on Textual and Relational Knowledge Bases. Our benchmark covers three domains: product search, academic paper search, and queries in precision medicine. We design a novel pipeline to synthesize realistic user queries that integrate diverse relational information and complex textual properties, together with their ground-truth answers (items). We conduct rigorous human evaluation to validate the quality of our synthesized queries. We further enhance the benchmark with high-quality human-generated queries to provide an authentic reference. STARK serves as a comprehensive testbed for evaluating the performance of retrieval systems driven by large language models (LLMs). Our experiments suggest that STARK presents significant challenges to the current retrieval and LLM systems, highlighting the need for more capable semi-structured retrieval systems. The benchmark data and code are available on https://github.com/snap-stanford/STaRK.
AvaTaR(claude-3-opus) tops the leaderboard with 50%
Best score per entry from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on November 12th, 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Names in gray aren't in our model list: fine-tunes, agent systems, products and older models. They don't count toward leaders.
- 1 AvaTaR(claude-3-opus) 50%
- 2 AvaTaR(gpt-4-turbo) 48.8%
- 3 ColBERTv2 46.1%
- 4 BM25 44.9%
- 5 GritLM-7b 42.1%
- 6 voyage-l2-instruct 40.9%
- 7 multi-ada-002 40.1%
- 8 ada-002 39.2%
- 9 ANCE (roberta) 31%
- 10 QAGNN (roberta) 26.6%
- 11 LLM2Vec 21.7%
- 12 DPR (roberta) 15.3%
Source: Official STaRK leaderboard
| # | Entry | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | AvaTaR(claude-3-opus) | 50% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 2 | AvaTaR(gpt-4-turbo) | 48.8% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 3 | ColBERTv2 | 46.1% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 4 | BM25 | 44.9% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 5 | GritLM-7b | 42.1% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 6 | voyage-l2-instruct | 40.9% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 7 | multi-ada-002 | 40.1% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 8 | ada-002 | 39.2% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 9 | ANCE (roberta) | 31% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 10 | QAGNN (roberta) | 26.6% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 11 | LLM2Vec | 21.7% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 12 | DPR (roberta) | 15.3% | Official leaderboard |
No lab model card reports it yet
We read the headline results of 522 launch posts from 52 labs, and none of them list this benchmark.
More in Knowledge
- MMLU-Pro In use Harder 10-option version of MMLU with reasoning-focused questions across 14 subjects.
Intern-S2-397B 89.8%
- SuperGPQA In use 26,529 graduate-level multiple-choice questions across 285 disciplines. Accuracy.
Qwen 3.6 Max (Preview) 73.9%
- WideSearch In use 200 bilingual broad info-seeking tasks: agent collects many atomic facts into a table. Scored by success rate and row/item F1.
Tencent Hy4 preview 83.9%
- BBEH micro average In use Models solve harder replacements for each of the 23 BIG-Bench Hard tasks, 4,520 examples in total. The score is the share of all examples answered correctly.
Gemma 4 31B IT 74.4%
- KMMLU-Pro In use Models answer multiple-choice questions taken from Korean National Professional Licensure exams. It tests professional knowledge used in Korean industry.
Solar Pro 4 79.2%
- HLE-Verified In use Verified and revised version of Humanity's Last Exam (1,811 items) with uncertain items removed.
Seed2.0 Pro 73.6%