Benchmark Almanac

STaRK

AvaTaR(claude-3-opus) 50% tops its leaderboard
Not in model cards

Retrieval systems find the right items for complex queries over knowledge bases that mix free text with relations between entities. The three domains are product search, academic paper search and precision medicine. Most queries are synthesized and checked by people, and a smaller set is written by people.

Entries are retrieval systems, many built on language-model embeddings or rerankers, not chat models. Results report ranking metrics such as Hit@1 and MRR. About 340 GitHub stars.

Released
April 2024
Kind
Questions that need search
Level
University
Scored
Checked automatically
Answers
Short answer
Tasks
All public

In the authors’ words

Answering real-world complex queries, such as complex product search, often requires accurate retrieval from semi-structured knowledge bases that involve blend of unstructured (e.g., textual descriptions of products) and structured (e.g., entity relations of products) information. However, many previous works studied textual and relational retrieval tasks as separate topics. To address the gap, we develop STARK, a large-scale Semi-structure retrieval benchmark on Textual and Relational Knowledge Bases. Our benchmark covers three domains: product search, academic paper search, and queries in precision medicine. We design a novel pipeline to synthesize realistic user queries that integrate diverse relational information and complex textual properties, together with their ground-truth answers (items). We conduct rigorous human evaluation to validate the quality of our synthesized queries. We further enhance the benchmark with high-quality human-generated queries to provide an authentic reference. STARK serves as a comprehensive testbed for evaluating the performance of retrieval systems driven by large language models (LLMs). Our experiments suggest that STARK presents significant challenges to the current retrieval and LLM systems, highlighting the need for more capable semi-structured retrieval systems. The benchmark data and code are available on https://github.com/snap-stanford/STaRK.

Abstract of STaRK: Benchmarking LLM Retrieval on Textual and Relational Knowledge Bases (arXiv:2404.13207, CC0)
12
Entries on its own leaderboard, 0 models we track

AvaTaR(claude-3-opus) tops the leaderboard with 50%

Best score per entry from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on November 12th, 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Names in gray aren't in our model list: fine-tunes, agent systems, products and older models. They don't count toward leaders.

  1. 1 AvaTaR(claude-3-opus) 50%
  2. 2 AvaTaR(gpt-4-turbo) 48.8%
  3. 3 ColBERTv2 46.1%
  4. 4 BM25 44.9%
  5. 5 GritLM-7b 42.1%
  6. 6 voyage-l2-instruct 40.9%
  7. 7 multi-ada-002 40.1%
  8. 8 ada-002 39.2%
  9. 9 ANCE (roberta) 31%
  10. 10 QAGNN (roberta) 26.6%
  11. 11 LLM2Vec 21.7%
  12. 12 DPR (roberta) 15.3%

Source: Official STaRK leaderboard

#EntryScoreSettingDateSource
1 AvaTaR(claude-3-opus) 50% Official leaderboard
2 AvaTaR(gpt-4-turbo) 48.8% Official leaderboard
3 ColBERTv2 46.1% Official leaderboard
4 BM25 44.9% Official leaderboard
5 GritLM-7b 42.1% Official leaderboard
6 voyage-l2-instruct 40.9% Official leaderboard
7 multi-ada-002 40.1% Official leaderboard
8 ada-002 39.2% Official leaderboard
9 ANCE (roberta) 31% Official leaderboard
10 QAGNN (roberta) 26.6% Official leaderboard
11 LLM2Vec 21.7% Official leaderboard
12 DPR (roberta) 15.3% Official leaderboard

No lab model card reports it yet

We read the headline results of 522 launch posts from 52 labs, and none of them list this benchmark.

More in Knowledge

All 121 in Knowledge
  • MMLU-Pro In use Harder 10-option version of MMLU with reasoning-focused questions across 14 subjects. Intern-S2-397B 89.8%
  • SuperGPQA In use 26,529 graduate-level multiple-choice questions across 285 disciplines. Accuracy. Qwen 3.6 Max (Preview) 73.9%
  • WideSearch In use 200 bilingual broad info-seeking tasks: agent collects many atomic facts into a table. Scored by success rate and row/item F1. Tencent Hy4 preview 83.9%
  • BBEH micro average In use Models solve harder replacements for each of the 23 BIG-Bench Hard tasks, 4,520 examples in total. The score is the share of all examples answered correctly. Gemma 4 31B IT 74.4%
  • KMMLU-Pro In use Models answer multiple-choice questions taken from Korean National Professional Licensure exams. It tests professional knowledge used in Korean industry. Solar Pro 4 79.2%
  • HLE-Verified In use Verified and revised version of Humanity's Last Exam (1,811 items) with uncertain items removed. Seed2.0 Pro 73.6%