Benchmark Almanac

SEED-Bench

LFM2.5-VL-3B 77.7% leads since Aug 2026 Fading

Models answer 19,000 human-annotated multiple-choice questions over 12 dimensions of image and video understanding. Scored by accuracy against the answer key.

Many papers report only the image dimensions. Later SEED-Bench-2 and SEED-Bench-2-Plus are separate tests.

In the authors’ words

Based on powerful Large Language Models (LLMs), recent generative Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have gained prominence as a pivotal research area, exhibiting remarkable capability for both comprehension and generation. In this work, we address the evaluation of generative comprehension in MLLMs as a preliminary step towards a comprehensive assessment of generative models, by introducing a benchmark named SEED-Bench. SEED-Bench consists of 19K multiple choice questions with accurate human annotations (x 6 larger than existing benchmarks), which spans 12 evaluation dimensions including the comprehension of both the image and video modality. We develop an advanced pipeline for generating multiple-choice questions that target specific evaluation dimensions, integrating both automatic filtering and manual verification processes. Multiple-choice questions with groundtruth options derived from human annotation enables an objective and efficient assessment of model performance, eliminating the need for human or GPT intervention during evaluation. We further evaluate the performance of 18 models across all 12 dimensions, covering both the spatial and temporal understanding. By revealing the limitations of existing MLLMs through evaluation results, we aim for SEED-Bench to provide insights for motivating future research. We will launch and consistently maintain a leaderboard to provide a platform for the community to assess and investigate model capability.

Abstract of SEED-Bench: Benchmarking Multimodal LLMs with Generative Comprehension (arXiv:2307.16125, CC0)
Made by Tencent AI Lab and ARC Lab (Li et al.) Released Jul 2023 General visual questions All tasks public Last in a launch post Aug 2026 , dropped before it saturated Last model added Aug 2026
Level
Everyday Most adults, without training
Scored
Checked automatically A program checks the result against an answer key, unit tests or the expected final state.
Answers
Multiple choice
3
Models scored in lab cards
3
Launch posts list it, from 2 labs
2
System cards report it, from 2 labs

LFM2.5-VL-3B leads with 77.7% among models released by Aug 2026

Best score per model as labs report them in their own cards. Labs pick their own settings, so these compare less cleanly than independent runs.

The newest model with a score here came out in Aug 2026, and nobody has reported a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:

  1. 1 LFM2.5-VL-3B 77.7%
  2. 2 Janus-Pro-7B 72.1%
  3. 3 LFM2-VL-1.6B 72%
#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 LFM2.5-VL-3B 77.7% Aug 2026 Model card
2 Janus-Pro-7B 72.1% Jan 2025 Model card
3 LFM2-VL-1.6B 72% Nov 2025 Model card

2 models have held number one since its release in Jul 2023

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.

DeepSeek Liquid AI
Lab claims Not tested since Aug 2026
LFM2.5-VL-3B 77.7%

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

Reported by the lab in its model card Best so far
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2025 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) LFM2.5-VL-3B Janus-Pro-7B 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2025 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) LFM2.5-VL-3B Janus-Pro-7B

Labs headline it less often now, last in Aug 2026

Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.

DeepSeek
Liquid AI
DateLaunch postScoreAs the post writes it
12 Aug 2026 LFM2.5-VL-3B 77.7 SEED-Bench (image)
12 Aug 2025 LFM2-VL-1.6B 72 SEEDBench_IMG
27 Jan 2025 Janus-Pro-7B 72.1 SEED

2 system cards report it, from 2 labs

Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.

DateDocumentScoreAs the document writes itSection
28 Nov 2025 LFM2-VL-1.6B technical report 72 SEEDBench, LFM2-VL-1.6B (Table 8) Capabilities
27 Jan 2025 Janus-Pro-7B technical report 72.1 SEED (Table 3) Capabilities

Versions

More in Vision

All 234 in Vision
  • MMMU In use 11.5K college-level multimodal questions across 30 subjects. Multiple-choice and open accuracy. GPT-5.1 85.4%
  • MMMU-Pro In use Harder MMMU: college-level multimodal questions with more options and vision-only inputs to remove text shortcuts. Kimi K3.1 Pro 84.1%
  • CharXiv In use Chart understanding on real arXiv figures. Reasoning questions require synthesizing information from complex charts. Claude Fable 5 93.5%
  • MATH-Vision (MathVision) In use 3,040 competition math problems with visual context. Answer accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 97.7%
  • ChartQA In use Models answer human-written and generated questions about chart images that need visual and arithmetic reasoning. Scored by relaxed accuracy with a 5 percent numeric tolerance. Command A Vision 90.9%
  • DocVQA In use Models answer 50,000 questions about 12,000 scanned document images by reading their text and layout. Scoring is ANLS, a string similarity to reference answers. Seed1.5-VL 96.9%