SEC-bench Pro
Agents hunt and reproduce security bugs in large software projects from limited information. The first release covers V8 and SpiderMonkey.
The 260505 snapshot of 5 May 2026 holds 103 V8 and 80 SpiderMonkey instances, 183 in all. A later 260617 snapshot adds Linux and more SpiderMonkey, reaching 344. The maker calls the benchmark self-evolving.
In the authors’ words
Finding a real vulnerability in complicated systems is a challenging, long-horizon task that demands reasoning across an entire codebase to produce a working proof-of-concept (PoC). However, such critical security problems remain understudied. We present SEC-bench Pro, a benchmark that measures how well frontier models hunt real vulnerabilities by reproducing working PoC inputs from disclosed reports, where each task pairs a concrete bug with the instructions for triggering it. We also demonstrate the limitations of existing rule-based judges for grading generated PoCs, and propose a novel LLM-based judge for more precise grading. We instantiate SEC-bench Pro with 344 validated vulnerabilities across three targets, the V8 and SpiderMonkey browser engines and the Linux kernel, covering critical vulnerability families including memory-safety, sandbox, JIT, race-condition, and kernel-subsystem bugs. Across six frontier commercial and open-weight models and three coding agents, the strongest, Codex with GPT-5.5, solves 58% of instances overall. We also observe that Claude Code with Opus 4.6 tends to time out but solves most instances it completes. In contrast, open-weight models struggle; for example, GLM-5 solves only 13 of the 344 instances. During construction and evaluation, SEC-bench Pro also surfaced three vulnerabilities in V8 and SpiderMonkey, including a sandbox escape that was fixed and earned a $20,000 Google Vulnerability Reward Program bounty. More recently, SEC-bench Pro has been adopted by OpenAI to evaluate the long-horizon security capabilities of its newest models. Overall, SEC-bench Pro exposes where long-horizon vulnerability discovery succeeds, where it fails, and how different grading choices change the evaluation landscape, offering insights for security-centric model evaluation and training. Our artifact is available at https://github.com/SEC-bench/SEC-bench-Pro.
- Level
- Expert Specialists with years of training, often over hours of work
- Scored
- Checked automatically A program checks the result against an answer key, unit tests or the expected final state.
- Answers
- Agent task Many steps in a terminal, browser, desktop, app, game or robot.
Gemini 4 Carbon leads with 88.2%
Best score per model as labs report them in their own cards. Labs pick their own settings, so these compare less cleanly than independent runs.
- 1
Gemini 4 Carbon 88.2%
- 2 GPT-6 Astra 85.4%
- 3 GPT-6.1 Terra 83.3%
- 4 GPT-6.1 Sol 78.8%
- 5 GPT-6 Sol 68.8%
- 6 MiMo-V2.6 Pro 66.3%
- 7
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 62.8%
- 8 GPT-5.6 Terra 57.7%
- 9 GPT-6 Luna 51.8%
- 10 GPT-5.6 Luna 48.9%
| # | Model | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | | 88.2% | Oct 2026 | Model card | |
| 2 | GPT-6 Astra | 85.4% | Sep 2026 | Model card | |
| 3 | GPT-6.1 Terra | 83.3% | Oct 2026 | Model card | |
| 4 | GPT-6.1 Sol | 78.8% | Sep 2026 | Model card | |
| 5 | GPT-6 Sol | 68.8% | Oct 2026 | Model card | |
| 6 | MiMo-V2.6 Pro | 66.3% | Sep 2026 | Model card | |
| 7 | | 62.8% | Sep 2026 | Model card | |
| 8 | GPT-5.6 Terra | 57.7% | Jul 2026 | Model card | |
| 9 | GPT-6 Luna | 51.8% | Oct 2026 | Model card | |
| 10 | GPT-5.6 Luna | 48.9% | Jul 2026 | Model card |
The benchmark's own leaderboard has 6 models. We plot every source in the charts below.
Number one over time
Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release. We draw one row each for the benchmark’s own leaderboard and what labs claim in their cards.
The best score passed 85% in Sep 2026
All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.
4 labs put it in a launch post in the last six months
Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.
| Date | Launch post | Score | As the post writes it |
|---|---|---|---|
| 28 Oct 2026 | 88.2 | SEC-bench Pro | |
| 22 Sep 2026 | MiMo-V2.6 Pro | 66.3 | SEC Bench Pro |
| 10 Sep 2026 | 62.8 | SEC-Bench Pro (Pass@1) | |
| 9 Jul 2026 | GPT-5.6 Luna | 48.9 | SEC-Bench Pro |
| 9 Jul 2026 | GPT-5.6 Terra | 57.7 | SEC-Bench Pro |
16 system cards report it, from 3 labs
Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.
| Date | Document | Score | As the document writes it | Section |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 29 Oct 2026 | GPT-6 Luna system card addendum | 51.8 | SEC-Bench Pro score (8.1.2.2) | Cyber risk |
| 26 Oct 2026 | GPT-6.1 Terra system card addendum | 83.3 | SEC-Bench Pro, pass@1 (Figure 27, 9.0.2.2) | Cyber risk |
| 7 Oct 2026 | GPT-6 Sol system card addendum | 68.8 | SEC-Bench Pro score (8.1.2.2) | Cyber risk |
| 7 Oct 2026 | GPT-6 Luna system card addendum | 48.5 | SEC-Bench Pro score (8.1.2.2) | Cyber risk |
| 29 Sep 2026 | GPT-6.1 Sol system card addendum | 78.8 | SEC-Bench Pro, pass@1 (9.1.2.2) | Cyber risk |
| 22 Sep 2026 | MiMo-V2.6 Pro technical report | 66.3 | SEC Bench Pro (Table 3) | Cyber risk |
| 22 Sep 2026 | GPT-6 Sol system card | 66.3 | SEC-Bench Pro score (A.8.1.2.2) | Cyber risk |
| 22 Sep 2026 | GPT-6 Luna system card | 34.2 | SEC-Bench Pro score (A.8.1.2.2) | Cyber risk |
| 10 Sep 2026 | | 62.8 | SEC-Bench Pro version 260505 (Pass@1), Claude Code harness (Table 3) | Cyber risk |
| 3 Sep 2026 | GPT-6 Astra system card | 85.4 | SEC-bench Pro, May 2026 version with improved grader, printed chart label (Figure 48) | Cyber risk |
| 9 Jul 2026 | GPT-5.6 Terra system card | SEC-bench Pro (May 2026 version), pass@1 by output tokens, chart without printed numbers (Figure 35, 9.1.2.4.3) | Cyber risk | |
| 9 Jul 2026 | GPT-5.6 Sol system card | SEC-bench Pro (May 2026 version), pass@1 by output tokens, chart without printed numbers (Figure 35, 9.1.2.4.3) | Cyber risk | |
| 9 Jul 2026 | GPT-5.6 Luna system card | SEC-bench Pro (May 2026 version), pass@1 by output tokens, chart without printed numbers (Figure 35, 9.1.2.4.3) | Cyber risk | |
| 25 Jun 2026 | GPT-5.6 Terra system card | SEC-bench Pro (May 2026 version), pass@1 by output tokens, chart without printed numbers (Figure 35, 9.1.2.4.3) | Cyber risk | |
| 25 Jun 2026 | GPT-5.6 Sol system card | SEC-bench Pro (May 2026 version), pass@1 by output tokens, chart without printed numbers (Figure 35, 9.1.2.4.3) | Cyber risk | |
| 25 Jun 2026 | GPT-5.6 Luna system card | SEC-bench Pro (May 2026 version), pass@1 by output tokens, chart without printed numbers (Figure 35, 9.1.2.4.3) | Cyber risk |
Versions
We switch the top row to each new version when it comes out. Open it for one row per version. An old version stays in play while people still test it, so whoever first takes it past 85% gets credit for closing it out.
More in Cybersecurity
- ExploitGym In use 869 real-vulnerability exploit-development tasks (userspace, V8, Linux kernel). Success means capturing a flag through the intended vulnerability. GPT-6 Astra 42.4%
- ExploitBench In use 41 recent V8 JavaScript-engine N-day vulnerabilities. Progress measured by 16 grader-verified capability flags across five tiers. GPT-6 Astra 100%
- CWE-bench In use Agents audit a repository and write a patch for a security flaw, without being told where the bug is. Covers six programming languages.
Gemini 4 Carbon 71%
- Real-world vulnerability discovery In use Agents search popular open-source codebases to rediscover about 1,200 recent confirmed vulnerabilities across many languages. Reports share discovered.
Gemini 4 Argon 86%
- Artificial Analysis Cyber Index In use Agents do enterprise cyber defense tasks from three benchmarks, CWE-Bench-AA, DeepsecBench-AA and CyberGym-E2E-AA, combined into one success rate.
Mistral Large 4 (Le Chonk, open weights) 51%
- Big Sleep Evaluation (Google) In use Agents search large real codebases such as Chrome and Safari for critical, hard to find vulnerabilities. Scored by pass@1 success rate, run without safety guardrails.
Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber 72%