Benchmark Almanac

RoboGate

Not in model cards

68 industrial pick-and-place scenarios (nominal, edge, adversarial, randomized) for a Franka arm in Isaac Sim. Organizers run submitted VLAs and report success.

All 15 policies score 0/68, with grasp-miss rate 1.0. A scripted IK baseline scores 57/68, so the floor effect gives no ranking. Many entries are LIBERO fine-tunes run zero-shot. Commercial vendor runs every model.

In the authors’ words

Deploying learned robot manipulation policies in industrial settings requires rigorous pre-deployment validation, yet exhaustive testing across high-dimensional parameter spaces is intractable. We present ROBOGATE, a deployment risk management framework that combines physics-based simulation with a two-stage adaptive sampling strategy to efficiently discover failure boundaries in the operational parameter space. Stage 1 employs Latin Hypercube Sampling (LHS) across an 8-dimensional parameter space; Stage 2 applies boundary-focused sampling concentrated in the 30-70% success rate transition zone. Using NVIDIA Isaac Sim with Newton physics, we evaluate a scripted pick-and-place controller across four robot embodiments – Franka Panda (7-DOF), UR3e (6-DOF), UR5e (6-DOF), and UR10e (6-DOF) – totaling over 50,000 experiments. Our logistic regression risk model achieves AUC 0.780 and identifies a closed-form failure boundary equation. We further benchmark eight VLA (Vision-Language-Action) policies, including a fine-tuned NVIDIA GR00T N1.6 (3B) trained on LIBERO-Spatial for 20K steps. The same checkpoint achieves 97.65% success rate on LIBERO (MuJoCo) but 0% on RoboGate's 68 industrial scenarios in NVIDIA Isaac Sim – a 97.65 percentage point cross-simulator gap on a single model that underscores the deployment validation challenge. Inspired by the validation-layer paradigm NVIDIA codified for quantum computing with Ising, ROBOGATE provides this validation layer for Physical AI. Open-source.

Abstract of ROBOGATE: Adaptive Failure Discovery for Safe Robot Policy Deployment via Two-Stage Boundary-Focused Sampling (arXiv:2603.22126, CC0)
Made by AgentAI Co. , Ltd. Released Mar 2026 Simulated robots All tasks public
Level
Everyday Most adults, without training
Scored
Checked automatically A program checks the result against an answer key, unit tests or the expected final state.
Answers
Agent task Many steps in a terminal, browser, desktop, app, game or robot.

No scores here yet

We have no scores for RoboGate yet.

See the live leaderboard on robogate.io

No lab model card reports it yet

We read the headline results of 479 launch posts from 51 labs, and none of them list this benchmark.

More in Robotics

All 86 in Robotics
  • ERQA In use 400 multiple-choice visual questions from robot and egocentric footage on spatial, trajectory, action and state reasoning. Accuracy. Gemini Robotics ER 2 78.5%
  • RoboLab In use Zero-shot DROID Franka policies in Isaac Lab on 120 tabletop tasks at three instruction levels, 10 episodes each. Success rate. GR00T N1.7 8.58%
  • Human proximity (Google DeepMind robotics) In use Models judge from robot camera views whether a human is within 1 meter, a spatial awareness check for safe robot behavior. Scored by accuracy. Gemini Robotics ER 2 93%
  • Moment finding (Google DeepMind) In use Models find the moment in a robot video when an event happens. Scored by accuracy and mean absolute time distance in seconds. Gemini Robotics ER 2 91.3%
  • Progress classification (Google DeepMind) In use Models assign each frame of a robot video to one of five task-progress bands from 0 to 100 percent. Scored by accuracy. Gemini Robotics ER 2 57.4%
  • LIBERO Fading Simulated Franka tabletop tasks in four 10-task suites. Policies fine-tuned on 50 demos per task. Success rate over ~50 trials. MolmoAct 2 97.2%