Benchmark Almanac

QuAC

Llama 3-70B 51.1% Dropped

Models answer free-form questions in information-seeking dialogs about a hidden Wikipedia section, across 100K questions. Scored by word-level F1.

In the authors’ words

We present QuAC, a dataset for Question Answering in Context that contains 14K information-seeking QA dialogs (100K questions in total). The dialogs involve two crowd workers: (1) a student who poses a sequence of freeform questions to learn as much as possible about a hidden Wikipedia text, and (2) a teacher who answers the questions by providing short excerpts from the text. QuAC introduces challenges not found in existing machine comprehension datasets: its questions are often more open-ended, unanswerable, or only meaningful within the dialog context, as we show in a detailed qualitative evaluation. We also report results for a number of reference models, including a recently state-of-the-art reading comprehension architecture extended to model dialog context. Our best model underperforms humans by 20 F1, suggesting that there is significant room for future work on this data. Dataset, baseline, and leaderboard available at http://quac.ai.

Abstract of QuAC : Question Answering in Context (arXiv:1808.07036, CC0)
Made by Allen Institute for AI , University of Washington , Stanford , and UMass Amherst Released Aug 2018 Reading comprehension Public tasks plus a private test set Last in a launch post Apr 2024 , dropped before it saturated Last model added Nov 2024
Level
Everyday Most adults, without training
Scored
Checked automatically A program checks the result against an answer key, unit tests or the expected final state.
Answers
Short answer A number, word or short string matched to a key.
1
Model scored in lab cards
1
Launch post lists it, from 1 lab
12
System cards report it, from 1 lab

Llama 3-70B leads with 51.1%

Best score per model as labs report them in their own cards. Labs pick their own settings, so these compare less cleanly than independent runs.

  1. 1 Llama 3-70B 51.1%
#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 Llama 3-70B 51.1% Apr 2024 Model card

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

Reported by the lab in its model card
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2024 Near the ceiling (85%) Llama 3-70B 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2024 Near the ceiling (85%) Llama 3-70B

No launch post has listed it since Apr 2024

Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.

Meta
DateLaunch postScoreAs the post writes it
18 Apr 2024 Llama 3-70B 51.1 QuAC (1-shot, F1) [pretrained]

12 system cards report it, from 1 lab

Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.

DateDocumentScoreAs the document writes itSection
23 Nov 2024 Llama 3.1-8B technical report 44.9 QuAC, pretrained (Table 9) Capabilities
23 Nov 2024 Llama 3.1-70B technical report 51.1 QuAC, pretrained (Table 9) Capabilities
23 Nov 2024 Llama 3.1-405B technical report 53.6 QuAC, pretrained (Table 9) Capabilities
23 Jul 2024 Llama 3.1-8B model card 44.9 QuAC (F1), 1-shot, pretrained (Base pretrained models table) Capabilities
23 Jul 2024 Llama 3.1-70B model card 51.1 QuAC (F1), 1-shot, pretrained (Base pretrained models table) Capabilities
23 Jul 2024 Llama 3.1-405B model card 53.6 QuAC (F1), 1-shot, pretrained (Base pretrained models table) Capabilities
18 Apr 2024 Llama 3-8B model card 44.4 QuAC (1-shot, F1), pretrained (Base pretrained models table) Capabilities
18 Apr 2024 Llama 3-70B model card 51.1 QuAC (1-shot, F1), pretrained (Base pretrained models table) Capabilities
19 Jul 2023 Llama 2-7B technical report 39.4 QuAC (f1), 0-shot, pretrained (Table 23) Capabilities
19 Jul 2023 Llama 2-70B technical report 42.4 QuAC (f1), 0-shot, pretrained (Table 23) Capabilities
19 Jul 2023 Llama 2-34B technical report 42.9 QuAC (f1), 0-shot, pretrained (Table 23) Capabilities
19 Jul 2023 Llama 2-13B technical report 42.7 QuAC (f1), 0-shot, pretrained (Table 23) Capabilities

More in Knowledge

All 109 in Knowledge
  • MMLU-Pro In use Harder 10-option version of MMLU with reasoning-focused questions across 14 subjects. Intern-S2-397B 89.8%
  • SuperGPQA In use 26,529 graduate-level multiple-choice questions across 285 disciplines. Accuracy. Qwen 3.6 Max (Preview) 73.9%
  • WideSearch In use 200 bilingual broad info-seeking tasks: agent collects many atomic facts into a table. Scored by success rate and row/item F1. Tencent Hy4 preview 83.9%
  • KMMLU-Pro In use Models answer multiple-choice questions taken from Korean National Professional Licensure exams. It tests professional knowledge used in Korean industry. Solar Pro 4 79.2%
  • BIG-Bench Extra Hard In use Models solve harder replacements for each of the 23 BIG-Bench Hard tasks, 4,520 examples in total. The score is a harmonic mean of task accuracies. Gemma 4 31B IT 74.4%
  • HLE-Verified In use Verified and revised version of Humanity's Last Exam (1,811 items) with uncertain items removed. Seed2.0 Pro 73.6%