Benchmark Almanac

PhyX

Qwen 3.8 Max 83.5% leads since Aug 2026 Fading

Models solve 3,000 image-based physics problems across six domains such as mechanics and optics. Versions include multiple choice and open-ended answers.

A 1,000 question testmini subset also exists, so check which split a model card reports.

In the authors’ words

Existing benchmarks fail to capture a crucial aspect of intelligence: physical reasoning, the integrated ability to combine domain knowledge, symbolic reasoning, and understanding of real-world constraints. To address this gap, we introduce PhyX: the first large-scale benchmark designed to assess models capacity for physics-grounded reasoning in visual scenarios. PhyX includes 3K meticulously curated multimodal questions spanning 6 reasoning types across 25 sub-domains and 6 core physics domains: thermodynamics, electromagnetism, mechanics, modern physics, optics, and wave&acoustics. In our comprehensive evaluation, even state-of-the-art models struggle significantly with physical reasoning. GPT-4o, Claude3.7-Sonnet, and GPT-o4-mini achieve only 32.5%, 42.2%, and 45.8% accuracy respectively-performance gaps exceeding 29% compared to human experts. Our analysis exposes critical limitations in current models: over-reliance on memorized disciplinary knowledge, excessive dependence on mathematical formulations, and surface-level visual pattern matching rather than genuine physical understanding. We provide in-depth analysis through fine-grained statistics, detailed case studies, and multiple evaluation paradigms to thoroughly examine physical reasoning capabilities. To ensure reproducibility, we implement a compatible evaluation protocol based on widely-used toolkits such as VLMEvalKit, enabling one-click evaluation. More details are available on our project page: https://phyx-bench.github.io/.

Abstract of PhyX: Does Your Model Have the "Wits" for Physical Reasoning? (arXiv:2505.15929, CC0)
Made by Hui Shen et al. Released May 2025 Science questions All tasks public Last in a launch post Aug 2026 , dropped before it saturated Last model added Aug 2026
Level
University Undergraduates and entry-level professionals
Scored
Graded by a model A language model scores each response, usually against a rubric.
Answers
Short answer A number, word or short string matched to a key.
3
Models scored in lab cards
2
Launch posts list it, from 2 labs
2
System cards report it, from 2 labs

Qwen 3.8 Max leads with 83.5% among models released by Aug 2026

Best score per model as labs report them in their own cards. Labs pick their own settings, so these compare less cleanly than independent runs.

The newest model with a score here came out in Aug 2026, and nobody has reported a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:

  1. 1 Qwen 3.8 Max 83.5%
  2. 2 Seed2.0 Pro 72.1%
  3. 3 STEP3-VL-10B 59.5%
#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 Qwen 3.8 Max 83.5% Aug 2026 Model card
2 Seed2.0 Pro 72.1% Feb 2026 Model card
3 STEP3-VL-10B 59.5% Jan 2026 Model card

3 models have held number one since its release in May 2025

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.

StepFun ByteDance Seed Qwen
Lab claims Not tested since Aug 2026
Qwen 3.8 Max 83.5%

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

Reported by the lab in its model card Best so far
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) Qwen 3.8 Max Seed2.0 Pro STEP3-VL-10B 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) Qwen 3.8 Max Seed2.0 Pro

Labs headline it less often now, last in Aug 2026

Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.

StepFun
Qwen
DateLaunch postScoreAs the post writes it
3 Aug 2026 Qwen 3.8 Max 83.5 PhyX
13 Jan 2026 STEP3-VL-10B 59.5 PhyX

2 system cards report it, from 2 labs

Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.

DateDocumentScoreAs the document writes itSection
14 Feb 2026 Seed2.0 Pro model card 72.1 PhyX (openended), testmini (Table 8) Capabilities
14 Jan 2026 STEP3-VL-10B technical report 59.5 PhyX, SeRe (Tables 1 and 3). PaCoRe 66.01 Capabilities

More in Science and reasoning

All 88 in Science and reasoning
  • GPQA Diamond In use 198 graduate-level 'Google-proof' multiple-choice questions in biology, chemistry and physics. Gemini 4 Argon 96.4%
  • Terminal-Bench-Science In use 70 scientific research-workflow tasks across five science areas, run in Harbor containers. Hidden tests give the resolution rate. GPT-6 Astra 68.1%
  • FrontierScience In use Models solve physics, chemistry, and biology problems in an Olympiad track graded by short answer and a Research track graded by 10-point rubrics. Intern-S2-397B 87%
  • BioMysteryBench In use Bioinformatics problems on anonymized real datasets that require real analysis with tools. Rubric-graded, with human-solvable and human-difficult splits. Claude Opus 5 90.1%
  • HiPhO In use Models solve theory problems from 2024 and 2025 physics olympiad exams, some with diagrams. Official marking schemes grade answers and steps, mapped to medal levels. Gemini 3 Pro 78.3%
  • LABBench2 In use 11 biology research sub-tasks (literature, figures, tables, patents, trials and more) with tool access. Macro-averaged accuracy. GPT-5.2 60.9%