HiPhO
Models solve theory problems from 2024 and 2025 physics olympiad exams, some with diagrams. Official marking schemes grade answers and steps, mapped to medal levels.
Gemini 3 Pro reached gold-medal level on all 13 original olympiads by December 2025.
In the authors’ words
Recently, the physical capabilities of (M)LLMs have garnered increasing attention. However, existing benchmarks for physics suffer from two major gaps: they neither provide systematic and up-to-date coverage of real-world physics competitions such as physics Olympiads, nor enable direct performance comparison with humans. To bridge these gaps, we present HiPhO, the first benchmark dedicated to high school physics Olympiads with human-aligned evaluation. Specifically, HiPhO highlights three key innovations. (1) Comprehensive Data: It compiles 13 latest Olympiad exams from 2024-2025, spanning both international and regional competitions, and covering mixed modalities that encompass problems spanning text-only to diagram-based. (2) Professional Evaluation: We adopt official marking schemes to perform fine-grained grading at both the answer and step level, fully aligned with human examiners to ensure high-quality and domain-specific evaluation. (3) Comparison with Human Contestants: We assign gold, silver, and bronze medals to models based on official medal thresholds, thereby enabling direct comparison between (M)LLMs and human contestants. Our large-scale evaluation of 30 state-of-the-art (M)LLMs shows that: across 13 exams, open-source MLLMs mostly remain at or below the bronze level; open-source LLMs show promising progress with multiple golds; closed-source reasoning MLLMs can achieve 6 to 12 gold medals; and most models still have a significant gap from full marks. These results highlight the performance gap between open-source models and top students, the strong reasoning abilities of closed-source models, and the remaining room for improvement. HiPhO, a human-aligned Olympiad benchmark for multimodal physical reasoning, is open-source at https://github.com/SciYu/HiPhO with a public leaderboard at https://phyarena.github.io/.
- Level
- Competition The strongest students, in olympiad-style contests
- Scored
- Graded by a model A language model scores each response, usually against a rubric.
- Answers
- Open-ended Free-form text, documents, designs or media judged as a whole.
Gemini 3 Pro leads with 78.3% among models released by Dec 2025
Best score per entry from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on 2 Nov 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Every run is in the next chart. Names in gray aren't in our model list: fine-tunes, agent systems, products and older models. They don't count toward leaders.
The newest model with a score here came out in Dec 2025, and nobody has tested a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:
- GPT-6 Astra
- Claude Opus 5.5
- GPT-6.1 Terra
- GPT-6.1 Sol
- and 16 more
- 78.3
Gemini 3 Pro
- 74.4 GPT-5.2
- 73.2 P1-VL-235B-A22B + PhysicsMinions
- 70.4 P1-VL-235B-A22B
- 70.4
Gemini 2.5 Pro
- 70.2 P1-235B-A22B + PhysicsMinions
- 67.9 GPT-5
- 66.2 P1-235B-A22B
- 65.7
DeepSeek-V3.2
- 64.8 o3
- 64.4 Grok 4
- 63.1 P1-VL-30B-A3B
- 62.8
Qwen3-VL-235B-A22B
- 62.2 gpt-oss-120b
- 61.5
Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking
- 61.5
Gemini 2.5 Flash
- 59.8 P1-30B-A3B
- 59.6
DeepSeek-R1
- 59.5 o4-mini
- 58.0 Claude Sonnet 4
- 57.9
Qwen3-235B-A22B
- 57.2 Kimi K2 Thinking
- 57.1 Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Thinking
- 55.4
Qwen3-32B
- 54.6
Qwen3-30B-A3B-Thinking
- 54.4 Kimi K2
- 52.2
Intern-S1
- 47.1
Qwen3-30B-A3B
- 45.7
DeepSeek-V3
- 40.4
Mistral Medium 3
- 37.2
InternVL3-78B
- 35.3 GLM-4.5V
- 32.1 GPT-4o
- 31.4
Qwen3-8B
- 29.9
Llama 4 Scout
- 29.0
Qwen2.5-VL-72B
- 28.0
Qwen2.5-VL-32B
- 25.8
InternVL3-38B
- 15.6
InternVL3-9B
- 12.2
Qwen2.5-VL-7B
- 10.6
Phi-4-multimodal
- 8.40
DeepSeek-VL2
- 1
Gemini 3 Pro 78.3%
- 2 GPT-5.2 high 74.4%
- 3 P1-VL-235B-A22B + PhysicsMinions 73.2%
- 4 P1-VL-235B-A22B 70.4%
- 5
Gemini 2.5 Pro Jun 2025 70.4%
- 6 P1-235B-A22B + PhysicsMinions 70.2%
- 7 GPT-5 67.9%
- 8 P1-235B-A22B 66.2%
- 9
DeepSeek-V3.2 65.7%
- 10 o3 64.8%
- 11 Grok 4 64.4%
- 12 P1-VL-30B-A3B 63.1%
- 13
Qwen3-VL-235B-A22B thinking 62.8%
- 14 gpt-oss-120b high 62.2%
- 15
Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking Jul 2025 61.5%
- 16
Gemini 2.5 Flash Sep 2025, thinking 61.5%
- 17 P1-30B-A3B 59.8%
- 18
DeepSeek-R1 May 2025 59.6%
- 19 o4-mini high 59.5%
- 20 Claude Sonnet 4 thinking 58%
- 21
Qwen3-235B-A22B 57.9%
- 22 Kimi K2 Thinking 57.2%
- 23 Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Thinking 57.1%
- 24
Qwen3-32B 55.4%
- 25
Qwen3-30B-A3B-Thinking Jul 2025 54.6%
- 26 Kimi K2 Jul 2025 54.4%
- 27
Intern-S1 52.2%
- 28
Qwen3-30B-A3B 47.1%
- 29
DeepSeek-V3 Mar 2025 45.7%
- 30
Mistral Medium 3 40.4%
- 31
InternVL3-78B 37.2%
- 32 GLM-4.5V 35.3%
- 33 GPT-4o Mar 2025 32.1%
- 34
Qwen3-8B 31.4%
- 35
Llama 4 Scout 29.9%
- 36
Qwen2.5-VL-72B 29%
- 37
Qwen2.5-VL-32B 28%
- 38
InternVL3-38B 25.8%
- 39
InternVL3-9B 15.6%
- 40
Qwen2.5-VL-7B 12.2%
- 41
Phi-4-multimodal 10.6%
- 42
DeepSeek-VL2 8.40%
| # | Entry | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | | 78.3% | Nov 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 2 | GPT-5.2 | 74.4% | high | Dec 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 3 | P1-VL-235B-A22B + PhysicsMinions | 73.2% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 4 | P1-VL-235B-A22B | 70.4% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 5 | | 70.4% | Jun 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 6 | P1-235B-A22B + PhysicsMinions | 70.2% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 7 | GPT-5 | 67.9% | Aug 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 8 | P1-235B-A22B | 66.2% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 9 | | 65.7% | Dec 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 10 | o3 | 64.8% | Apr 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 11 | Grok 4 | 64.4% | Jul 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 12 | P1-VL-30B-A3B | 63.1% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 13 | | 62.8% | thinking | Sep 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 14 | gpt-oss-120b | 62.2% | high | Aug 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 15 | | 61.5% | Jul 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 16 | | 61.5% | thinking | Sep 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 17 | P1-30B-A3B | 59.8% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 18 | | 59.6% | May 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 19 | o4-mini | 59.5% | high | Apr 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 20 | Claude Sonnet 4 | 58% | thinking | May 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 21 | | 57.9% | Apr 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 22 | Kimi K2 Thinking | 57.2% | Nov 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 23 | Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Thinking | 57.1% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 24 | | 55.4% | Apr 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 25 | | 54.6% | Jul 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 26 | Kimi K2 Jul 2025 | 54.4% | Jul 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 27 | | 52.2% | Jul 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 28 | | 47.1% | Apr 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 29 | | 45.7% | Mar 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 30 | | 40.4% | May 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 31 | | 37.2% | Apr 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 32 | GLM-4.5V | 35.3% | Aug 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 33 | GPT-4o Mar 2025 | 32.1% | Mar 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 34 | | 31.4% | Apr 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 35 | | 29.9% | Apr 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 36 | | 29% | Jan 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 37 | | 28% | Mar 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 38 | | 25.8% | Apr 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 39 | | 15.6% | Apr 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 40 | | 12.2% | Jan 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 41 | | 10.6% | Feb 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 42 | | 8.40% | Dec 2024 | Official leaderboard |
Labs report scores for 4 models in their cards. We plot every source in the charts below.
Scores at each effort level
Models the leaderboard ran at two or more effort levels. We don’t have enough cost data here to say what the extra effort costs.
| Model | Effort | Harness | Score | Cost per task | Output tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| | 78.3% | ||||
| GPT-5.2 | high | 74.4% | |||
| | 70.4% | ||||
| GPT-5 | 67.9% | ||||
| | 65.7% | ||||
| o3 | 64.8% | ||||
| Grok 4 | 64.4% | ||||
| | thinking | 62.8% | |||
| gpt-oss-120b | high | 62.2% | |||
| | 61.5% | ||||
| | thinking | 61.5% | |||
| | 59.6% | ||||
| o4-mini | high | 59.5% | |||
| Claude Sonnet 4 | thinking | 58% | |||
| | 57.9% | ||||
| o4-mini | 57.2% | ||||
| Kimi K2 Thinking | 57.2% | ||||
| | 55.4% | ||||
| | 54.6% | ||||
| gpt-oss-120b | 54.6% | ||||
| Kimi K2 Jul 2025 | 54.4% | ||||
| | 52.2% | ||||
| Claude Sonnet 4 | 50.7% | ||||
| | 47.1% | ||||
| | 45.7% | ||||
| | 40.4% | ||||
| | 37.2% | ||||
| GLM-4.5V | 35.3% | ||||
| GPT-4o Mar 2025 | 32.1% | ||||
| | 31.4% | ||||
| | 29.9% | ||||
| | 29% | ||||
| | 28% | ||||
| | 25.8% | ||||
| | 15.6% | ||||
| | 12.2% | ||||
| | 10.6% | ||||
| | 8.40% |
2 models have held number one since its release in Sep 2025
Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release. We draw one row each for the benchmark’s own leaderboard and what labs claim in their cards.
The best score passed 85% in Aug 2026
All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.
One lab put it in a launch post in the last six months
Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.
| Date | Launch post | Score | As the post writes it |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3 Aug 2026 | 90 | HiPhO | |
| 1 Jun 2026 | 84.1 | HiPhO | |
| 28 Apr 2026 | 83.8 | HiPhO |
One system card reports it
Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.
| Date | Document | Score | As the document writes it | Section |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 14 Feb 2026 | | 74.1 | HiPhO, mean normalized score over 13 olympiads (Table 8) | Capabilities |
More in Science and reasoning
- GPQA Diamond In use 198 graduate-level 'Google-proof' multiple-choice questions in biology, chemistry and physics.
Gemini 4 Argon 96.4%
- Terminal-Bench-Science In use 70 scientific research-workflow tasks across five science areas, run in Harbor containers. Hidden tests give the resolution rate. GPT-6 Astra 68.1%
- FrontierScience In use Models solve physics, chemistry, and biology problems in an Olympiad track graded by short answer and a Research track graded by 10-point rubrics.
Intern-S2-397B 87%
- BioMysteryBench In use Bioinformatics problems on anonymized real datasets that require real analysis with tools. Rubric-graded, with human-solvable and human-difficult splits. Claude Opus 5 90.1%
- LABBench2 In use 11 biology research sub-tasks (literature, figures, tables, patents, trials and more) with tool access. Macro-averaged accuracy. GPT-5.2 60.9%
- SGI-Bench In use Models work through more than 1,000 expert samples in four scientist tasks: deep research, idea generation, dry and wet experiments, and experimental reasoning.
Intern-S2-397B 51.9%