OpenAI cyber safety evaluations (incl. Daybreak Blue)
Only in system cards
Refusal and helpfulness evaluations for cyber requests, including the Daybreak Blue set for enabling defensive security work.
Made by OpenAI Refusing harmful requests Tasks kept private Last in a system card Oct 2026
Last model added Oct 2026
- Scored
- Graded by a model A language model scores each response, usually against a rubric.
- Answers
- Open-ended Free-form text, documents, designs or media judged as a whole.
22
System cards report it, from 1 lab
No scores here yet
No lab, leaderboard or Epoch AI run has reported a score for OpenAI cyber safety evaluations (incl. Daybreak Blue) yet.
Labs report it only in system cards
We read the headline results of 479 launch posts from 51 labs, and none of them list this benchmark. Some system cards do, below.
22 system cards report it, from 1 lab
Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.
| Date | Document | Score | As the document writes it | Section |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 29 Oct 2026 | GPT-6 Luna system card addendum | Cybersecurity Safety Evaluation, production chat and synthetic agentic rows, no overall score (Table 11) | Safety | |
| 26 Oct 2026 | GPT-6.1 Terra system card addendum | Cybersecurity Safety Evaluation, production chat 0.980, synthetic agentic envs 1.00, semi-synthetic agentic envs 0.973, no overall score (Table 32) | Safety | |
| 7 Oct 2026 | GPT-6 Sol system card addendum | Cybersecurity Safety Evaluation, production chat and synthetic agentic rows, no overall score (Table 11) | Safety | |
| 7 Oct 2026 | GPT-6 Luna system card addendum | Cybersecurity Safety Evaluation, production chat and synthetic agentic rows, no overall score (Table 11) | Safety | |
| 29 Sep 2026 | GPT-6.1 Sol system card addendum | Cybersecurity Safety Evaluation, production chat and agentic environment rows, no overall score (Table 12) | Safety | |
| 22 Sep 2026 | GPT-6 Sol system card | Cybersecurity Safety Evaluation, production chat and agentic environment rows, no overall score (Table 36) | Safety | |
| 22 Sep 2026 | GPT-6 Luna system card | Cybersecurity Safety Evaluation, production chat and agentic environment rows, no overall score (Table 36) | Safety | |
| 3 Sep 2026 | GPT-6 Astra system card | Cybersecurity Safety Evaluation, production chat and agentic environment rows, no overall score (Table 20) | Safety | |
| 6 Aug 2026 | GPT-5.6 Sol system card addendum | Cyber Model Refusal Evaluation, production data and synthetic data rows (0.999, 0.982), no overall score (7.2.1.2) | Safety | |
| 6 Aug 2026 | GPT-5.6 Luna system card addendum | Cyber Model Refusal Evaluation, production data and synthetic data rows (0.974, 0.997), no overall score (7.2.1.2) | Safety | |
| 9 Jul 2026 | GPT-5.6 Terra system card | Cybersecurity safety evaluation, production data and synthetic data rows (0.987, 0.998), no overall score (9.4.2.2) | Safety | |
| 9 Jul 2026 | GPT-5.6 Sol system card | Cybersecurity safety evaluation, production data and synthetic data rows (0.981, 0.998), no overall score (9.4.2.2) | Safety | |
| 9 Jul 2026 | GPT-5.6 Luna system card | Cybersecurity safety evaluation, production data and synthetic data rows (0.986, 1.00), no overall score (9.4.2.2) | Safety | |
| 25 Jun 2026 | GPT-5.6 Terra system card | Cybersecurity safety evaluation, production data and synthetic data rows (0.987, 0.998), no overall score (9.3.2.2) | Safety | |
| 25 Jun 2026 | GPT-5.6 Sol system card | Cybersecurity safety evaluation, production data and synthetic data rows (0.981, 0.998), no overall score (9.3.2.2) | Safety | |
| 25 Jun 2026 | GPT-5.6 Luna system card | Cybersecurity safety evaluation, production data and synthetic data rows (0.986, 1.00), no overall score (9.3.2.2) | Safety | |
| 4 May 2026 | GPT-5.5 Instant system card | Cyber safety evaluations, production data 0.978 and synthetic data 1.000, no overall score (Table 12, 8.2.2) | Safety | |
| 23 Apr 2026 | GPT-5.5 system card | Cyber safety training evaluation, policy compliance on production and synthetic data, no overall score (Table 17, 9.3.2.2) | Safety | |
| 5 Mar 2026 | GPT-5.4 system card | Cyber safety evaluation, not unsafe on deidentified production and synthetic data, no overall score (Table 15, 5.3.3) | Safety | |
| 5 Feb 2026 | GPT-5.3 Codex system card | Cyber safety policy compliance, production data 0.940 and synthetic data 0.996, no overall score (Table 7, 5.2.1.3.1) | Safety | |
| 18 Dec 2025 | GPT-5.2 Codex system card addendum | Cyber safety training, policy compliance rate, production data 0.921 and synthetic data 0.939, no overall score (Table 3, 4.1.2) | Safety | |
| 11 Dec 2025 | GPT-5.2 system card addendum | Cyber safety evaluations, policy compliance, production traffic 0.966 and synthetic data 0.993, no overall score (Table 7) | Safety |
More in Safety and alignment
- FORTRESS In use Paired adversarial and benign national-security misuse prompts. Rubric-graded risk score on adversarial and over-refusal score on benign prompts. Claude Opus 5.5 5.78%
- StrongREJECT In use Forbidden-prompt jailbreak benchmark with a rubric grader that scores how useful a non-refusal actually is.
Inkling 98.6% - AgentDojo In use Agents do tool-use tasks while tools and data carry prompt injections. Attack success rate counts hijacked runs. Grok 4 Fast 0%
- MASK In use Measures whether a model contradicts its own elicited beliefs under pressure to lie. Honesty separated from accuracy.
Muse Spark Open 98.1% - Gray Swan IPI Arena benchmark In use Indirect prompt-injection attacks from public red-teaming competitions replayed on tool, coding and browser agents. Attack success rate at k attempts. GPT-6 Astra 8.50%
- Agentic misalignment suite (Anthropic) In use Agents in simulated company settings face threats or goal conflicts that invite blackmail, leaking or sabotage. Score is the misaligned action rate. Claude Sonnet 4.5 0%