Benchmark Almanac

OMEGA

Olmo 3.1 32B Think 53.4% leads since Dec 2025 Fading

Models solve generated competition-style math problems that test exploratory, compositional and transformative generalization beyond training patterns. Answers are checked automatically.

Ai2 hosts the explorative, compositional and transformative splits and a 500-problem set on Hugging Face. Olmo 3 cards report it.

In the authors’ words

Recent large-scale language models (LLMs) with long Chain-of-Thought reasoning-such as DeepSeek-R1-have achieved impressive results on Olympiad-level mathematics benchmarks. However, they often rely on a narrow set of strategies and struggle with problems that require a novel way of thinking. To systematically investigate these limitations, we introduce OMEGA-Out-of-distribution Math Problems Evaluation with 3 Generalization Axes-a controlled yet diverse benchmark designed to evaluate three axes of out-of-distribution generalization, inspired by Boden's typology of creativity: (1) Exploratory-applying known problem solving skills to more complex instances within the same problem domain; (2) Compositional-combining distinct reasoning skills, previously learned in isolation, to solve novel problems that require integrating these skills in new and coherent ways; and (3) Transformative-adopting novel, often unconventional strategies by moving beyond familiar approaches to solve problems more effectively. OMEGA consists of programmatically generated training-test pairs derived from templated problem generators across geometry, number theory, algebra, combinatorics, logic, and puzzles, with solutions verified using symbolic, numerical, or graphical methods. We evaluate frontier (or top-tier) LLMs and observe sharp performance degradation as problem complexity increases. Moreover, we fine-tune the Qwen-series models across all generalization settings and observe notable improvements in exploratory generalization, while compositional generalization remains limited and transformative reasoning shows little to no improvement. By isolating and quantifying these fine-grained failures, OMEGA lays the groundwork for advancing LLMs toward genuine mathematical creativity beyond mechanical proficiency.

Abstract of OMEGA: Can LLMs Reason Outside the Box in Math? Evaluating Exploratory, Compositional, and Transformative Generalization (arXiv:2506.18880, CC0)
Made by UC Berkeley , Ai2 and University of Washington (Sun et al.) Released Jun 2025 Competition problems with answers All tasks public Last in a launch post Dec 2025 , dropped before it saturated Last model added Dec 2025
Level
Competition The strongest students, in olympiad-style contests
Scored
Checked automatically A program checks the result against an answer key, unit tests or the expected final state.
Answers
Short answer A number, word or short string matched to a key.
2
Models scored in lab cards
2
Launch posts list it, from 1 lab
2
System cards report it, from 1 lab

Olmo 3.1 32B Think leads with 53.4%

Best score per model as labs report them in their own cards. Labs pick their own settings, so these compare less cleanly than independent runs.

  1. 1 Olmo 3.1 32B Think 53.4%
  2. 2 Olmo 3 32B Think 50.8%
#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 Olmo 3.1 32B Think 53.4% Dec 2025 Model card
2 Olmo 3 32B Think 50.8% Nov 2025 Model card

2 models have held number one since its release in Jun 2025

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.

Ai2
Lab claims Not tested since Dec 2025

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

Reported by the lab in its model card Best so far
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) Olmo 3.1 32B Think 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) Olmo 3.1 32B Think

Labs headline it less often now, last in Dec 2025

Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.

Ai2
DateLaunch postScoreAs the post writes it
12 Dec 2025 Olmo 3.1 32B Think 53.4 OMEGA
20 Nov 2025 Olmo 3 32B Think 50.8 OMEGA

2 system cards report it, from 1 lab

Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.

DateDocumentScoreAs the document writes itSection
15 Dec 2025 Olmo 3 32B Think technical report 50.6 OMEGA, Final Think 3.0 column (Table 14) Capabilities
15 Dec 2025 Olmo 3.1 32B Think technical report 53.4 OMEGA (Tables 1 and 14) Capabilities

More in Math

All 105 in Math
  • IMO-AnswerBench In use 400 olympiad problems with short verifiable answers, robustified against memorization. Scored by answer match. GLM-5.2 91%
  • AIME 2026 In use Models solve the 30 integer-answer problems from the 2026 AIME I and II math competitions. Scored by exact answer match. GPT-5.5 100%
  • HMMT 2026 In use Models solve the 33 final-answer problems from the February 2026 Harvard-MIT Mathematics Tournament. Scored by exact answer match. GPT-5.5 98.5%
  • MathArena (Apex, IMO, USAMO) In use Evaluates models on newly released math competitions after release. Final-answer or human/LLM-judged proof scores. Claude Opus 4.8 81.3%
  • PolyMath In use Models solve 9,000 parallel math problems in 18 languages across four difficulty levels, from school math to frontier math. Final answers are checked. Qwen3.7-Max 86.5%
  • USAMO 2026 In use Models write full proofs for the six problems of the 2026 USA Mathematical Olympiad. Judges grade each proof from 0 to 7 against rubrics. GPT-5.5 98.2%