OCRBench v2
Visual-text localization and reasoning tasks across 31 scenarios (documents, scenes, charts). Averaged task accuracy.
In the authors’ words
Scoring the Optical Character Recognition (OCR) capabilities of Large Multimodal Models (LMMs) has witnessed growing interest. Existing benchmarks have highlighted the impressive performance of LMMs in text recognition; however, their abilities in certain challenging tasks, such as text localization, handwritten content extraction, and logical reasoning, remain underexplored. To bridge this gap, we introduce OCRBench v2, a large-scale bilingual text-centric benchmark with currently the most comprehensive set of tasks (4x more tasks than the previous multi-scene benchmark OCRBench), the widest coverage of scenarios (31 diverse scenarios), and thorough evaluation metrics, with 10,000 human-verified question-answering pairs and a high proportion of difficult samples. Moreover, we construct a private test set with 1,500 manually annotated images. The consistent evaluation trends observed across both public and private test sets validate the OCRBench v2's reliability. After carefully benchmarking state-of-the-art LMMs, we find that most LMMs score below 50 (100 in total) and suffer from five-type limitations, including less frequently encountered text recognition, fine-grained perception, layout perception, complex element parsing, and logical reasoning. The project website is at: https://99franklin.github.io/ocrbench_v2/
- Level
- Everyday Most adults, without training
- Scored
- Checked automatically A program checks the result against an answer key, unit tests or the expected final state.
- Answers
- Short answer A number, word or short string matched to a key.
SEEU DOC tops the leaderboard with 76.2%
Best score per entry from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on 2 Nov 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Names in gray aren't in our model list: fine-tunes, agent systems, products and older models. They don't count toward leaders. The best model we track is Qwen3.6 27B, at 68.3%.
- 76.2 SEEU DOC
- 73.4 Yaochi-DTS-A2T-1.9
- 71.7 U2-OCR
- 69.8 Posicube_DVLM
- 68.3
Qwen3.6 27B
- 68.1 KDL Frontier
- 67.4
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
- 65.8
Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B-A3B
- 65.5
Qwen 3.6 35B-A3B
- 65.3
Qwen3.5-35B-A3B
- 63.5
Qwen 3.8 27B
- 63.4
Gemini 3 Pro
- 62.2 Seed1.6-vision
- 61.8 TeleMM-2.0
- 61.3
Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B
- 61.2
Nemotron Nano 12B v2 VL
- 59.9 SenseNova-U1.5-8B-MoT
- 59.3
Gemini 2.5 Pro
- 59.0 GLM-4.6V-Flash
- 58.7
Qwen3.5-9B
- 58.2 SenseNova-U1
- 56.9 Muse-Glimmer-30B
- 56.4
Llama-3.1-Nemotron-Nano-VL-8B-V1
- 55.5 GPT-5
- 54.1 Ovis2.5-8B
- 51.8
Gemma 4 12B
- 51.6
Gemini 1.5 Pro
- 50.5 GPT-5.2
- 49.3
SAIL-VL2-8B
- 48.4
MiniCPM-V 4.5
- 48.4 Claude Opus 4.6
- 47.6 GPT-4o
- 47.6 LLaVA-OneVision 2 8B Instruct
- 47.5 Claude 3.5 Sonnet
- 47.1
InternVL3.5-14B
- 46.8
InternVL3-14B
- 46.8 Step-1V
- 46.1
Ovis2-8B
- 46.0
InternVL3.5-8B
- 46.0 LLaVA-OneVision-1.5-8B-Instruct
- 45.3
InternVL3-8B
- 45.0 Grok 4
- 44.9
MiniCPM-o 4.5
- 44.7
Molmo2-8B
- 44.1 GPT-4o mini
- 43.3
Ministral 3 14B
- 43.3 dots.mocr
- 43.1
SAIL-VL-1.6-8B
- 42.6
InternVL2.5-26B
- 42.6 LFM2.5-VL-3B
- 42.5 WeThink-Qwen2.5VL-7B
- 42.4 Claude Sonnet 4
- 42.3 Qwen2-VL-7B-Instruct
- 42.3 Youtu-VL-4B-Instruct
- 41.8
InternVL2-26B
- 41.8
Qwen2.5-VL-7B
- 41.6 MiniCPM-o-2_6
- 41.0
DeepSeek-VL2-Small
- 40.5
InternVL2.5-8B
- 40.4
MiniCPM-V 4.6
- 38.4
Pixtral 12B
- 38.1
Phi-4-multimodal
- 38.0
Ovis1.6-Llama3.2-3B
- 37.1 GLM-4V-9B
- 36.1
InternVL2-8B
- 33.9
InternLM-XComposer2-4KHD-7B
- 33.9 Molmo-7B
- 33.7
LLaVA-OneVision 7B
- 33.0 MiniCPM-V-2_6
- 32.3
Cambrian-1-8B
- 32.1 Kimi-VL-A3B-16B
- 28.5 llama3-llava-next-8b
- 26.0
Idefics3-8B-Llama3
- 25.7 Qwen-VL-Chat
- 25.7
Eagle-X5-7B
- 24.8 Qwen-VL
- 24.5
DeepSeek-VL-7B-Chat
- 24.2 Monkey
- 23.4
DocOwl2
- 23.4 TextMonkey
- 23.2
Llama-3-VILA1.5-8B
- 20.2 Emu2-Chat
- 19.9 CogVLM-17B-Chat
- 19.7
Yi-VL-6B
- 16.5
mPLUG-Owl3-7B
- 14.3
Janus-1.3B
- 14.1 UReader
- 12.4 LLaVAR
- 1 SEEU DOC 76.2%
- 2 Yaochi-DTS-A2T-1.9 73.4%
- 3 U2-OCR 71.7%
- 4 Posicube_DVLM 69.8%
- 5
Qwen3.6 27B 68.3%
- 6 KDL Frontier 68.1%
- 7
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 67.4%
- 8
Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B-A3B 65.8%
- 9
Qwen 3.6 35B-A3B 65.5%
- 10
Qwen3.5-35B-A3B 65.3%
- 11
Qwen 3.8 27B 63.5%
- 12
Gemini 3 Pro 63.4%
- 13 Seed1.6-vision 62.2%
- 14 TeleMM-2.0 61.8%
- 15
Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B 61.3%
- 16
Nemotron Nano 12B v2 VL 61.2%
- 17 SenseNova-U1.5-8B-MoT 59.9%
- 18
Gemini 2.5 Pro Jun 2025 59.3%
- 19 GLM-4.6V-Flash 59%
- 20
Qwen3.5-9B 58.7%
- 21 SenseNova-U1 58.2%
- 22 Muse-Glimmer-30B 56.9%
- 23
Llama-3.1-Nemotron-Nano-VL-8B-V1 56.4%
- 24 GPT-5 55.5%
- 25 Ovis2.5-8B 54.1%
- 26
Gemma 4 12B 51.8%
- 27
Gemini 1.5 Pro Sep 2024 51.6%
- 28 GPT-5.2 50.5%
- 29
SAIL-VL2-8B 49.3%
- 30
MiniCPM-V 4.5 48.4%
- 31 Claude Opus 4.6 48.4%
- 32 GPT-4o Mar 2025 47.6%
- 33 LLaVA-OneVision 2 8B Instruct 47.6%
- 34 Claude 3.5 Sonnet 47.5%
- 35
InternVL3.5-14B 47.1%
- 36
InternVL3-14B 46.8%
- 37 Step-1V 46.8%
- 38
Ovis2-8B 46.1%
- 39
InternVL3.5-8B 46%
- 40 LLaVA-OneVision-1.5-8B-Instruct 46%
- 41
InternVL3-8B 45.3%
- 42 Grok 4 45%
- 43
MiniCPM-o 4.5 44.9%
- 44
Molmo2-8B 44.7%
- 45 GPT-4o mini 44.1%
- 46
Ministral 3 14B 43.3%
- 47 dots.mocr 43.3%
- 48
SAIL-VL-1.6-8B 43.1%
- 49
InternVL2.5-26B 42.6%
- 50 LFM2.5-VL-3B 42.6%
- 51 WeThink-Qwen2.5VL-7B 42.5%
- 52 Claude Sonnet 4 42.4%
- 53 Qwen2-VL-7B-Instruct 42.3%
- 54 Youtu-VL-4B-Instruct 42.3%
- 55
InternVL2-26B 41.8%
- 56
Qwen2.5-VL-7B 41.8%
- 57 MiniCPM-o-2_6 41.6%
- 58
DeepSeek-VL2-Small 41%
- 59
InternVL2.5-8B 40.5%
- 60
MiniCPM-V 4.6 40.4%
- 61
Pixtral 12B 38.4%
- 62
Phi-4-multimodal 38.1%
- 63
Ovis1.6-Llama3.2-3B 38%
- 64 GLM-4V-9B 37.1%
- 65
InternVL2-8B 36.1%
- 66
InternLM-XComposer2-4KHD-7B 33.9%
- 67 Molmo-7B 33.9%
- 68
LLaVA-OneVision 7B 33.7%
- 69 MiniCPM-V-2_6 33%
- 70
Cambrian-1-8B 32.3%
- 71 Kimi-VL-A3B-16B 32.1%
- 72 llama3-llava-next-8b 28.5%
- 73
Idefics3-8B-Llama3 26%
- 74 Qwen-VL-Chat 25.7%
- 75
Eagle-X5-7B 25.7%
- 76 Qwen-VL 24.8%
- 77
DeepSeek-VL-7B-Chat 24.5%
- 78 Monkey 24.2%
- 79
DocOwl2 23.4%
- 80 TextMonkey 23.4%
- 81
Llama-3-VILA1.5-8B 23.2%
- 82 Emu2-Chat 20.2%
- 83 CogVLM-17B-Chat 19.9%
- 84
Yi-VL-6B 19.7%
- 85
mPLUG-Owl3-7B 16.5%
- 86
Janus-1.3B 14.3%
- 87 UReader 14.1%
- 88 LLaVAR 12.4%
| # | Entry | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | SEEU DOC | 76.2% | Sep 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 2 | Yaochi-DTS-A2T-1.9 | 73.4% | Sep 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 3 | U2-OCR | 71.7% | Sep 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 4 | Posicube_DVLM | 69.8% | Sep 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 5 | | 68.3% | Apr 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 6 | KDL Frontier | 68.1% | Sep 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 7 | | 67.4% | Oct 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 8 | | 65.8% | Apr 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 9 | | 65.5% | Apr 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 10 | | 65.3% | Feb 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 11 | | 63.5% | Aug 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 12 | | 63.4% | Nov 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 13 | Seed1.6-vision | 62.2% | Sep 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 14 | TeleMM-2.0 | 61.8% | Sep 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 15 | | 61.3% | Sep 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 16 | | 61.2% | Oct 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 17 | SenseNova-U1.5-8B-MoT | 59.9% | Sep 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 18 | | 59.3% | Jun 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 19 | GLM-4.6V-Flash | 59% | Dec 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 20 | | 58.7% | Feb 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 21 | SenseNova-U1 | 58.2% | Sep 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 22 | Muse-Glimmer-30B | 56.9% | Sep 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 23 | | 56.4% | Jun 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 24 | GPT-5 | 55.5% | Aug 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 25 | Ovis2.5-8B | 54.1% | Jun 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 26 | | 51.8% | Jun 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 27 | | 51.6% | Sep 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 28 | GPT-5.2 | 50.5% | Dec 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 29 | | 49.3% | Sep 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 30 | | 48.4% | Aug 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 31 | Claude Opus 4.6 | 48.4% | Feb 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 32 | GPT-4o Mar 2025 | 47.6% | Mar 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 33 | LLaVA-OneVision 2 8B Instruct | 47.6% | Jun 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 34 | Claude 3.5 Sonnet | 47.5% | Jun 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 35 | | 47.1% | Aug 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 36 | | 46.8% | Apr 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 37 | Step-1V | 46.8% | Sep 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 38 | | 46.1% | Feb 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 39 | | 46% | Aug 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 40 | LLaVA-OneVision-1.5-8B-Instruct | 46% | Sep 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 41 | | 45.3% | Apr 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 42 | Grok 4 | 45% | Jul 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 43 | | 44.9% | Feb 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 44 | | 44.7% | Dec 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 45 | GPT-4o mini | 44.1% | Jul 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 46 | | 43.3% | Dec 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 47 | dots.mocr | 43.3% | Mar 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 48 | | 43.1% | Apr 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 49 | | 42.6% | Dec 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 50 | LFM2.5-VL-3B | 42.6% | Aug 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 51 | WeThink-Qwen2.5VL-7B | 42.5% | Sep 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 52 | Claude Sonnet 4 | 42.4% | May 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 53 | Qwen2-VL-7B-Instruct | 42.3% | Aug 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 54 | Youtu-VL-4B-Instruct | 42.3% | Mar 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 55 | | 41.8% | Jul 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 56 | | 41.8% | Jan 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 57 | MiniCPM-o-2_6 | 41.6% | Jan 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 58 | | 41% | Dec 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 59 | | 40.5% | Dec 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 60 | | 40.4% | Apr 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 61 | | 38.4% | Sep 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 62 | | 38.1% | Feb 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 63 | | 38% | Oct 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 64 | GLM-4V-9B | 37.1% | Jun 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 65 | | 36.1% | Jul 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 66 | | 33.9% | Apr 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 67 | Molmo-7B | 33.9% | Sep 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 68 | | 33.7% | Aug 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 69 | MiniCPM-V-2_6 | 33% | Aug 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 70 | | 32.3% | Jun 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 71 | Kimi-VL-A3B-16B | 32.1% | Sep 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 72 | llama3-llava-next-8b | 28.5% | Apr 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 73 | | 26% | Aug 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 74 | Qwen-VL-Chat | 25.7% | Aug 2023 | Official leaderboard | |
| 75 | | 25.7% | Aug 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 76 | Qwen-VL | 24.8% | Sep 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 77 | | 24.5% | Mar 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 78 | Monkey | 24.2% | Nov 2023 | Official leaderboard | |
| 79 | | 23.4% | Sep 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 80 | TextMonkey | 23.4% | Sep 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 81 | | 23.2% | Apr 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 82 | Emu2-Chat | 20.2% | Dec 2023 | Official leaderboard | |
| 83 | CogVLM-17B-Chat | 19.9% | Nov 2023 | Official leaderboard | |
| 84 | | 19.7% | Dec 2023 | Official leaderboard | |
| 85 | | 16.5% | Aug 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 86 | | 14.3% | Oct 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 87 | UReader | 14.1% | Sep 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 88 | LLaVAR | 12.4% | Sep 2025 | Official leaderboard |
Labs report scores for 20 models in their cards. We plot every source in the charts below.
8 models have held number one since its release in Dec 2024
Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release. We draw one row each for the benchmark’s own leaderboard and what labs claim in their cards.
Scores over time
All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.
4 labs put it in a launch post in the last six months
Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.
| Date | Launch post | Score | As the post writes it |
|---|---|---|---|
| 15 Oct 2026 | 68.1 | OCRBench v2, EN 68.12 / ZH 59.15 | |
| 12 Aug 2026 | LFM2.5-VL-3B | 47.5 | OCRBench v2 (En) |
| 12 Aug 2026 | 36.7 | OCRBench v2_en | |
| 3 Aug 2026 | 74.2 | OCR-Bench-V2 (EN/ZH) 74.2 / 68.3 | |
| 1 Jun 2026 | 70.7 | OCR-Bench-V2(EN) 70.7, OCR-Bench-V2(ZH) 67.1 | |
| 28 Apr 2026 | 67 | OCRBenchV2 (EN) | |
| 9 Apr 2026 | 63.2 | OCRBench v2 | |
| 2 Feb 2026 | 60.1 | OCRBench V2 (ENG / CHN) 60.1 / 60.6 | |
| 8 Dec 2025 | GLM-4.6V | 65.1 | OCR-Bench_v2 (EN) |
| 2 Dec 2025 | 58.2 | OCRBench-v2 avg accuracy | |
| 2 Dec 2025 | 56.1 | OCRBench-v2 avg accuracy | |
| 2 Dec 2025 | 64.5 | OCRBench-v2 avg accuracy | |
| 28 Oct 2025 | 62 | OCRBenchv2 (English) | |
| 23 Sep 2025 | 66.8 | OCRBenchV2 (en/ch) 66.8 / 63.5 | |
| 3 Jun 2025 | 60.1 | OCRBenchV2 English 60.1 / Chinese 37.9 | |
| 30 Apr 2025 | 56.9 | OCRBench-v2 | |
| 27 Mar 2025 | 57.8 | OCRBench_V2en | |
| 28 Jan 2025 | 61.5 | OCRBench-V2(en/zh) 61.5/63.7 |
14 system cards report it, from 6 labs
Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.
| Date | Document | Score | As the document writes it | Section |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 15 Oct 2026 | | 68.1 | OCRBench-v2 (EN) 68.12, (ZH) 59.15 (Table 10) | Capabilities |
| 23 Jun 2026 | | 63.2 | OCRBenchv2 (Table 9) | Capabilities |
| 27 Apr 2026 | | 67 | OCRBenchV2 (EN), reasoning on, ZH 52.7. Reasoning off EN 65.8, ZH 52.0 (Table 7) | Capabilities |
| 9 Apr 2026 | | 63.2 | OCRBench v2 (Table 2, Reasoning mode) | Capabilities |
| 26 Mar 2026 | | 60.1 | OCRBench V2 (ENG / CHN) 60.1 / 60.6, English recorded, non-thinking (Table 2) | Capabilities |
| 14 Feb 2026 | | 62.5 | OCRBenchv2, mean of English and Chinese overall (Table 8) | Capabilities |
| 2 Dec 2025 | | 58.2 | OCRBench-v2 avg accuracy (Table 6). The 1.2 text says 58.5 | Capabilities |
| 2 Dec 2025 | | 56.1 | OCRBench-v2 avg accuracy (Table 3) | Capabilities |
| 2 Dec 2025 | | 64.5 | OCRBench-v2 avg accuracy (Table 3) | Capabilities |
| 26 Nov 2025 | | OCRBench_v2 en 66.8, zh 63.5, no overall (Table 2) | Capabilities | |
| 6 Nov 2025 | | 54.8 | OCRBenchV2 EN, reasoning on, ZH 39.8 (Table 3). Reasoning off EN 62.0, ZH 44.2 | Capabilities |
| 30 Apr 2025 | | 56.9 | OCRBench-v2 (Table 1) | Capabilities |
| 26 Mar 2025 | | 57.8 | OCRBench_V2 en (Table 5) | Capabilities |
| 19 Feb 2025 | | OCRBench_v2 en 61.5, zh 63.7, no overall (Table 5) | Capabilities |
Versions
We switch the top row to each new version when it comes out. Open it for one row per version. An old version stays in play while people still test it, so whoever first takes it past 85% gets credit for closing it out.
More in Vision
- MMMU In use 11.5K college-level multimodal questions across 30 subjects. Multiple-choice and open accuracy. GPT-5.1 85.4%
- MMMU-Pro In use Harder MMMU: college-level multimodal questions with more options and vision-only inputs to remove text shortcuts. Kimi K3.1 Pro 84.1%
- CharXiv In use Chart understanding on real arXiv figures. Reasoning questions require synthesizing information from complex charts. Claude Fable 5 93.5%
- MATH-Vision (MathVision) In use 3,040 competition math problems with visual context. Answer accuracy.
Qwen 3.8 Max 97.7%
- ChartQA In use Models answer human-written and generated questions about chart images that need visual and arithmetic reasoning. Scored by relaxed accuracy with a 5 percent numeric tolerance.
Command A Vision 90.9%
- DocVQA In use Models answer 50,000 questions about 12,000 scanned document images by reading their text and layout. Scoring is ANLS, a string similarity to reference answers.
Seed1.5-VL 96.9%