Benchmark Almanac

No-CoT math time horizon

Only in system cards

Models solve math problems without a visible chain of thought. Scored as the human task length in minutes the model solves reliably.

Third-party UK AISI measurement. Higher means more reasoning without visible CoT, which UK AISI treats as less monitorable.

Made by UK AI Security Institute Released Jul 2026 Deception and alignment Tasks kept private Last in a system card Sep 2026 Last model added Sep 2026
Level
Competition The strongest students, in olympiad-style contests
Scored
Checked automatically A program checks the result against an answer key, unit tests or the expected final state.
Answers
Short answer A number, word or short string matched to a key.
2
System cards report it, from 1 lab

No scores here yet

No lab, leaderboard or Epoch AI run has reported a score for No-CoT math time horizon yet.

Labs report it only in system cards

We read the headline results of 479 launch posts from 51 labs, and none of them list this benchmark. Some system cards do, below.

2 system cards report it, from 1 lab

Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.

DateDocumentScoreAs the document writes itSection
3 Sep 2026 GPT-6 Astra system card 30.9 UK AISI No-CoT math time horizon, 50%-reliability (9.3, Figure 41) Monitorability
9 Jul 2026 GPT-5.6 Sol system card 3.6 UK AISI no-CoT math reasoning time horizon (9.2.2) Monitorability

More in Safety and alignment

All 444 in Safety and alignment
  • FORTRESS In use Paired adversarial and benign national-security misuse prompts. Rubric-graded risk score on adversarial and over-refusal score on benign prompts. Claude Opus 5.5 5.78%
  • StrongREJECT In use Forbidden-prompt jailbreak benchmark with a rubric grader that scores how useful a non-refusal actually is. Inkling 98.6%
  • AgentDojo In use Agents do tool-use tasks while tools and data carry prompt injections. Attack success rate counts hijacked runs. Grok 4 Fast 0%
  • MASK In use Measures whether a model contradicts its own elicited beliefs under pressure to lie. Honesty separated from accuracy. Muse Spark Open 98.1%
  • Gray Swan IPI Arena benchmark In use Indirect prompt-injection attacks from public red-teaming competitions replayed on tool, coding and browser agents. Attack success rate at k attempts. GPT-6 Astra 8.50%
  • Agentic misalignment suite (Anthropic) In use Agents in simulated company settings face threats or goal conflicts that invite blackmail, leaking or sabotage. Score is the misaligned action rate. Claude Sonnet 4.5 0%