MultiPL-E
Models write code for HumanEval and MBPP problems translated into 18 other programming languages. Scored by pass@1 on unit tests.
In the authors’ words
Large language models have demonstrated the ability to generate both natural language and programming language text. Such models open up the possibility of multi-language code generation: could code generation models generalize knowledge from one language to another? Although contemporary code generation models can generate semantically correct Python code, little is known about their abilities with other languages. We propose MultiPL-E, a system for translating unit test-driven code generation benchmarks to new languages. We create the first massively multilingual code generation benchmark by using MultiPL-E to translate two popular Python code generation benchmarks to 18 additional programming languages. We use MultiPL-E to extend the HumanEval benchmark and MBPP benchmark to 18 languages that encompass a range of programming paradigms and popularity. Using these new parallel benchmarks, we evaluate the multi-language performance of three state-of-the-art code generation models: Codex, CodeGen, and InCoder. We find that Codex matches or even exceeds its performance on Python for several other languages. The range of programming languages represented in MultiPL-E allow us to explore the impact of language frequency and language features on model performance. Finally, the MultiPL-E approach of compiling code generation benchmarks to new programming languages is both scalable and extensible, making it straightforward to evaluate new models, benchmarks, and languages.
- Level
- School Students, from grade school to high school
- Scored
- Checked automatically A program checks the result against an answer key, unit tests or the expected final state.
- Answers
- Code A program or patch run against tests.
qwen3-coder-next leads with 88.2% among models released by Apr 2026
Best score per model as labs report them in their own cards. Labs pick their own settings, so these compare less cleanly than independent runs.
The newest model with a score here came out in Apr 2026, and nobody has reported a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:
- GPT-6 Astra
- Claude Opus 5.5
- GPT-6.1 Terra
- GPT-6.1 Sol
- and 16 more
- 88.2
qwen3-coder-next
- 85.7 Kimi K2
- 81.4
Mistral Medium 3
- 81.4
Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B
- 79.5
Qwen2.5-VL-72B
- 77.1
Qwen2.5-14B-Instruct-1M
- 76.9
Mistral Large 2
- 76.2 Mercury Coder Small
- 75.4
Qwen2.5-32B
- 75.1
Qwen2.5-72B
- 73.7
Qwen-Turbo
- 72.8
Qwen2.5-14B
- 70.4
Qwen2.5-7B
- 69.2
Qwen2-72B
- 65.8
Qwen2.5-Omni-7B
- 62.3 Granite 4.1 30B
- 57.4 Granite 4.0 H Small
- 32.2 granite-4.0-1b
- 1
qwen3-coder-next 88.2%
- 2 Kimi K2 Jul 2025 85.7%
- 3
Mistral Medium 3 81.4%
- 4
Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B 81.4%
- 5
Qwen2.5-VL-72B 79.5%
- 6
Qwen2.5-14B-Instruct-1M 77.1%
- 7
Mistral Large 2 Jul 2024 76.9%
- 8 Mercury Coder Small 76.2%
- 9
Qwen2.5-32B 75.4%
- 10
Qwen2.5-72B 75.1%
- 11
Qwen-Turbo 73.7%
- 12
Qwen2.5-14B 72.8%
- 13
Qwen2.5-7B 70.4%
- 14
Qwen2-72B 69.2%
- 15
Qwen2.5-Omni-7B 65.8%
- 16 Granite 4.1 30B 62.3%
- 17 Granite 4.0 H Small 57.4%
- 18 granite-4.0-1b 32.2%
| # | Model | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | | 88.2% | Feb 2026 | Model card | |
| 2 | Kimi K2 Jul 2025 | 85.7% | Jul 2025 | Model card | |
| 3 | | 81.4% | May 2025 | Model card | |
| 4 | | 81.4% | Sep 2025 | Model card | |
| 5 | | 79.5% | Feb 2025 | Model card | |
| 6 | | 77.1% | Jan 2025 | Model card | |
| 7 | | 76.9% | Jul 2024 | Model card | |
| 8 | Mercury Coder Small | 76.2% | Feb 2025 | Model card | |
| 9 | | 75.4% | Dec 2024 | Model card | |
| 10 | | 75.1% | Sep 2024 | Model card | |
| 11 | | 73.7% | Dec 2024 | Model card | |
| 12 | | 72.8% | Dec 2024 | Model card | |
| 13 | | 70.4% | Dec 2024 | Model card | |
| 14 | | 69.2% | Jun 2024 | Model card | |
| 15 | | 65.8% | Mar 2025 | Model card | |
| 16 | Granite 4.1 30B | 62.3% | Apr 2026 | Model card | |
| 17 | Granite 4.0 H Small | 57.4% | Oct 2025 | Model card | |
| 18 | granite-4.0-1b | 32.2% | Oct 2025 | Model card |
7 models have held number one since 2023
Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.
The best score passed 85% in Jul 2025
All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.
Labs headline it less often now, last in Apr 2026
Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.
| Date | Launch post | Score | As the post writes it |
|---|---|---|---|
| 29 Apr 2026 | Granite 4.1 30B | 62.3 | MULTIPLE (pass@1) |
| 28 Oct 2025 | granite-4.0-1b | 32.2 | MULTIPLE (pass@1) |
| 2 Oct 2025 | Granite 4.0 H Small | 57.4 | MULTIPLE (pass@1) |
| 22 Sep 2025 | 81.4 | MultiPL-E | |
| 11 Jul 2025 | Kimi K2 | 85.7 | MultiPL-E, Pass@1 |
| 7 May 2025 | 81.4 | MultiPL-E average 0-shot | |
| 27 Mar 2025 | 65.8 | MultiPL-E | |
| 26 Feb 2025 | Mercury Coder Small | 76.2 | MultiPL-E |
| 19 Sep 2024 | 75.1 | MultiPL-E | |
| 24 Jul 2024 | 76.9 | MultiPL-E Average (Python, C++, Bash, Java, TypeScript, PHP, C#) | |
| 7 Jun 2024 | 69.2 | MultiPL-E |
19 system cards report it, from 4 labs
Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.
| Date | Document | Score | As the document writes it | Section |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 28 Feb 2026 | | 88.2 | MultiPL-E (Table 6) | Capabilities |
| 22 Sep 2025 | | 81.4 | MultiPL-E, Instruct (Table 4). Thinking 80.6 (Table 5) | Capabilities |
| 21 Jul 2025 | Kimi K2 technical report | 85.7 | MultiPL-E (Pass@1) (Table 3) | Capabilities |
| 17 Jun 2025 | Mercury Coder Small technical report | 76.2 | MultiPL-E Avg over C++ 82.0, Java 80.1, JS 83.9, PHP 78.3, Bash 50.1, TS 82.6 (Tables 1 and 2) | Capabilities |
| 26 Mar 2025 | | 65.8 | MultiPL-E (Table 1) | Capabilities |
| 19 Feb 2025 | | 79.5 | MultiPL-E (Table 4) | Capabilities |
| 26 Jan 2025 | | 77.1 | MultiPL-E (Table 6) | Capabilities |
| 19 Dec 2024 | | 70.4 | MultiPL-E, Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct (Table 8) | Capabilities |
| 19 Dec 2024 | | 75.1 | MultiPL-E, Qwen2.5-72B-Instruct (Table 6) | Capabilities |
| 19 Dec 2024 | | 75.4 | MultiPL-E, Qwen2.5-32B-Instruct (Table 7) | Capabilities |
| 19 Dec 2024 | | 72.8 | MultiPL-E, Qwen2.5-14B-Instruct (Table 7) | Capabilities |
| 19 Dec 2024 | | 73.7 | MultiPL-E, Qwen2.5-Turbo (Table 7) | Capabilities |
| 23 Nov 2024 | | MultiPL-E pass@1 by language, no overall, post-trained (Table 19): HumanEval C++ 52.8, Java 58.2, PHP 54.7, TS 56.6, C# 38.0, Shell 39.2. MBPP C++ 53.7, Java 54.4, PHP 55.7, TS 62.8, C# 43.3, Shell 33.0 | Capabilities | |
| 23 Nov 2024 | | MultiPL-E pass@1 by language, no overall, post-trained (Table 19): HumanEval C++ 71.4, Java 72.2, PHP 67.7, TS 73.0, C# 50.0, Shell 51.9. MBPP C++ 65.2, Java 65.3, PHP 64.0, TS 70.5, C# 51.0, Shell 41.9 | Capabilities | |
| 23 Nov 2024 | | MultiPL-E pass@1 by language, no overall, post-trained (Table 19): HumanEval C++ 82.0, Java 80.4, PHP 76.4, TS 81.1, C# 54.4, Shell 57.6. MBPP C++ 67.5, Java 65.8, PHP 76.6, TS 72.6, C# 53.1, Shell 43.7 | Capabilities | |
| 23 Jul 2024 | | Multipl-E HumanEval 50.8 and Multipl-E MBPP 52.4, pass@1, no overall, instruction tuned (Instruction tuned models table) | Capabilities | |
| 23 Jul 2024 | | Multipl-E HumanEval 65.5 and Multipl-E MBPP 62.0, pass@1, no overall, instruction tuned (Instruction tuned models table) | Capabilities | |
| 23 Jul 2024 | | Multipl-E HumanEval 75.2 and Multipl-E MBPP 65.7, pass@1, no overall, instruction tuned (Instruction tuned models table) | Capabilities | |
| 15 Jul 2024 | | 69.2 | MultiPL-E, Qwen2-72B-Instruct (Table 6) | Capabilities |
More in Coding
- SWE-bench Verified In use 500 human-validated GitHub issues from 12 Python repos. Agent writes a patch that must pass hidden tests. Claude Opus 4.7 83.5%
- SWE-bench Multilingual In use 300 GitHub-issue tasks across nine programming languages in SWE-bench format. Patch graded by repository tests. Claude Opus 5.5 93.9%
- LiveCodeBench v6 In use Competitive programming problems collected after model cutoffs from LeetCode, AtCoder, Codeforces. Scored pass@1 on hidden tests.
DeepSeek-V4-Pro 93.5%
- DeepSWE In use 113 original long-horizon engineering tasks across 91 repos and five languages, written from scratch. Hand-written verifiers accept alternative solutions. GPT-6 Astra 74.1%
- SciCode In use Scientist-curated research coding problems split into subproblems across natural sciences. Code checked against test cases.
Seed2.1 Pro 59.8%
- Codeforces rating In use Model solves recent Codeforces contest problems. An Elo-style rating is computed from simulated contest performance.
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 3,471