Benchmark Almanac

MM-BrowseComp

MiMo-V2-Omni 52% leads since Mar 2026 Fading

Browsing agents answer 400 hand-written questions whose evidence sits in web images and videos. Each question has a checklist for analysis of the reasoning path.

Accepted to EMNLP 2026. The paper evaluates 27 models.

In the authors’ words

AI agents with advanced reasoning and tool-use capabilities have demonstrated impressive performance in web browsing for deep search. However, existing benchmarks such as BrowseComp primarily focus on textual content, overlooking the prevalence of multimodal content. To bridge this gap, we introduce MM-BrowseComp, a novel benchmark comprising 400 challenging, hand-crafted questions designed to evaluate multimodal retrieval and reasoning capabilities. Unlike prior work, MM-BrowseComp incorporates visual prompts and necessitates the extraction of key evidence from web images and videos to complete questions, rendering text-only approaches insufficient. Additionally, we provide a verified checklist for each question, enabling fine-grained analysis of multimodal dependencies and reasoning paths. Our comprehensive evaluation of 27 state-of-the-art models reveals that even leading models like GPT-5-High with tools achieve only 24.25% accuracy, highlighting the suboptimal multimodal browsing capabilities, establishing MM-BrowseComp as a rigorous new standard for the field.

Abstract of MM-BrowseComp: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Multimodal Browsing Agents (arXiv:2508.13186, CC0)
Made by ByteDance Seed and collaborators (Li et al.) Released Aug 2025 Deep research Last in a launch post Jun 2026 , dropped before it saturated Last model added Jun 2026
Level
Expert Specialists with years of training, often over hours of work
Scored
Checked automatically A program checks the result against an answer key, unit tests or the expected final state.
Answers
Short answer A number, word or short string matched to a key.
5
Models scored in lab cards
5
Launch posts list it, from 4 labs
2
System cards report it, from 1 lab

MiMo-V2-Omni leads with 52% among models released by Jun 2026

Best score per model as labs report them in their own cards. Labs pick their own settings, so these compare less cleanly than independent runs.

The newest model with a score here came out in Jun 2026, and nobody has reported a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:

  1. 1 MiMo-V2-Omni 52%
  2. 2 Seed2.0 Pro 48.8%
  3. 3 Seed1.8 46.3%
  4. 4 Qwen3.7-Plus 46.3%
  5. 5 GLM-4.6V 7.60%
#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 MiMo-V2-Omni 52% Mar 2026 Model card
2 Seed2.0 Pro 48.8% Feb 2026 Model card
3 Seed1.8 46.3% Dec 2025 Model card
4 Qwen3.7-Plus 46.3% Jun 2026 Model card
5 GLM-4.6V 7.60% Dec 2025 Model card

4 models have held number one since its release in Aug 2025

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.

Z.ai ByteDance Seed Xiaomi Corp
Lab claims Not tested since Jun 2026

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

Reported by the lab in its model card Best so far
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) MiMo-V2-Omni Seed1.8 GLM-4.6V 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) MiMo-V2-Omni GLM-4.6V

Labs headline it less often now, last in Jun 2026

Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.

Z.ai
ByteDance Seed
Xiaomi Corp
Qwen
DateLaunch postScoreAs the post writes it
1 Jun 2026 Qwen3.7-Plus 46.3 MMBC (with search)
18 Mar 2026 MiMo-V2-Omni 52 MM-BrowserComp
14 Feb 2026 Seed2.0 Pro 48.8 MM-BrowseComp
18 Dec 2025 Seed1.8 46.3 MM-BrowseComp
8 Dec 2025 GLM-4.6V 7.6 MMBrowseComp

2 system cards report it, from 1 lab

Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.

DateDocumentScoreAs the document writes itSection
21 Mar 2026 Seed1.8 model card 46.3 MM-BrowseComp (Table 4) Capabilities
14 Feb 2026 Seed2.0 Pro model card 48.8 MM-BrowseComp (Table 11) Capabilities

More in Tool use

All 125 in Tool use
  • AutomationBench In use Agent completes end-to-end business workflows inside a simulated company exposing dozens of REST APIs. Graded on resulting state. Gemini 4 Carbon 53.9%
  • MCP Atlas In use Multi-step workflows over real MCP servers. Scores tool-use competency on realistic tasks. Muse Spark 1.1 88.1%
  • BFCL V4 In use Models call functions and tools, including multi-turn agentic tasks with web search and memory. Checked against expected calls and outcomes. Qwen3.7-Max 75%
  • τ³-bench Banking In use Agents act as banking customer-service reps over many turns with a simulated user, following policy. Pass^1 on the final database state. Qwen 3.8 Max 55.1%
  • Claw-Eval In use 300 human-verified agent tasks (service orchestration, multimodal, multi-turn dialogue) audited via traces and snapshots. Rubric scores with Pass^3 consistency. Claude Sonnet 4.6 81.4%
  • DeepSearchQA In use Questions that need multi-step search and synthesis. Final answers graded against references. Kimi K3 95%