Benchmark Almanac

miniCTX-v2

Seed-Prover 81.8% Dropped

Provers prove Lean theorems from real projects using long repository context, with theorems taken after a November 28, 2024 cutoff.

An update of miniCTX (2024) with new theorems, so scores are not comparable with v1. The month is the creation date of the Hugging Face dataset.

In the authors’ words

Real-world formal theorem proving often depends on a wealth of context, including definitions, lemmas, comments, file structure, and other information. We introduce miniCTX, which tests a model's ability to prove formal mathematical theorems that depend on new context that is not seen during training. miniCTX contains theorems sourced from real Lean projects and textbooks, each associated with a context that can span tens of thousands of tokens. Models are tasked with proving a theorem given access to code from the theorem's repository, which contains context that is needed for the proof. As a baseline for miniCTX, we tested fine-tuning and prompting methods that condition theorem proving on preceding context. Both approaches substantially outperform traditional methods that rely solely on state information. We found that this ability to use context is not captured by previous benchmarks such as miniF2F. Alongside miniCTX, we offer ntp-toolkit for automatically extracting and annotating theorem proving data, making it easy to add new projects into miniCTX to ensure that contexts are not seen during training. miniCTX offers a challenging and realistic evaluation of neural theorem provers.

Abstract of miniCTX: Neural Theorem Proving with (Long-)Contexts (arXiv:2408.03350, CC0)
Made by CMU L3 Lab (Hu et al.) Released Mar 2025 Formal proofs All tasks public Last in a launch post Jul 2025 , dropped before it saturated Last model added Sep 2025 Scores refreshed 2 Nov 2026
Level
Expert Specialists with years of training, often over hours of work
Scored
Checked automatically A program checks the result against an answer key, unit tests or the expected final state.
Answers
Written proof
1
Model scored in lab cards
1
Launch post lists it, from 1 lab

Seed-Prover leads with 81.8%

Best score per model as labs report them in their own cards. Labs pick their own settings, so these compare less cleanly than independent runs.

  1. 1 Seed-Prover 81.8%
#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 Seed-Prover 81.8% Jul 2025 Model card

The benchmark's own leaderboard has 4 models. We plot every source in the charts below.

2 models have held number one since its release in Mar 2025

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.

OpenAI Google DeepMind
Own leaderboard Not tested since Sep 2025

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

On the benchmark’s own leaderboard Reported by the lab in its model card Best so far
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2025 Near the ceiling (85%) Seed-Prover Gemini 2.5 Pro GPT-4o 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2025 Near the ceiling (85%) Seed-Prover Gemini 2.5 Pro

No launch post has listed it since Jul 2025

Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.

ByteDance Seed
DateLaunch postScoreAs the post writes it
31 Jul 2025 Seed-Prover 81.8 MiniCTX-v2 (Light)

More in Math

All 105 in Math
  • IMO-AnswerBench In use 400 olympiad problems with short verifiable answers, robustified against memorization. Scored by answer match. GLM-5.2 91%
  • AIME 2026 In use Models solve the 30 integer-answer problems from the 2026 AIME I and II math competitions. Scored by exact answer match. GPT-5.5 100%
  • HMMT 2026 In use Models solve the 33 final-answer problems from the February 2026 Harvard-MIT Mathematics Tournament. Scored by exact answer match. GPT-5.5 98.5%
  • MathArena (Apex, IMO, USAMO) In use Evaluates models on newly released math competitions after release. Final-answer or human/LLM-judged proof scores. Claude Opus 4.8 81.3%
  • PolyMath In use Models solve 9,000 parallel math problems in 18 languages across four difficulty levels, from school math to frontier math. Final answers are checked. Qwen3.7-Max 86.5%
  • USAMO 2026 In use Models write full proofs for the six problems of the 2026 USA Mathematical Olympiad. Judges grade each proof from 0 to 7 against rubrics. GPT-5.5 98.2%