Benchmark Almanac

Meeseeks

LongCat-Flash-Chat 43% leads since Aug 2025 Dropped

Models follow complex instructions over several turns and get feedback on failed requirements after each turn. Scored by how many requirements they meet.

It has Chinese and English versions. LongCat launch posts report Meeseeks-zh.

In the authors’ words

The capability to precisely adhere to instructions is a cornerstone for Large Language Models (LLMs) to function as dependable agents in real-world scenarios. However, confronted with complex prompts, LLMs frequently encounter difficulties in fulfilling all specified requirements within a single response. Drawing inspiration from recent advancements in Chain-of-Thought (CoT) prompting and self-correction methodologies, we introduce Meeseeks (The name is inspired by Mr. Meeseeks from "Rick and Morty," a character renowned for efficiently accomplishing assigned tasks. See: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mr._Meeseeks), a fully automated iterative instruction-following benchmark equipped with an integrated feedback mechanism. Meeseeks identifies erroneous components in model responses and provides corresponding feedback accurately, thereby iteratively guiding the model toward self-correction. The dataset contains over 700 curated instances annotated by 32 distinct capability tags in Chinese and English. Extensive experimental results reveal that different state-of-the-art commercial and open-source LLMs exhibit vastly disparate performance, and even after 20 turns of iterative feedback-driven self-correction, nearly all models demonstrate suboptimal performance. We conducted comprehensive analysis from both macro and instance levels, uncovering numerous common issues prevalent in current state-of-the-art models, as well as several counterintuitive phenomena. We've open-sourced our work on https://github.com/ADoublLEN/Meeseeks.

Abstract of Meeseeks: A Feedback-Driven, Iterative Self-Correction Benchmark evaluating LLMs' Instruction Following Capability (arXiv:2504.21625, CC0)
Made by Meituan Released Apr 2025 Multi-turn conversation All tasks public Last in a launch post Oct 2025 , dropped before it saturated Last model added Oct 2025
Level
Everyday Most adults, without training
Scored
Graded by a model A language model scores each response, usually against a rubric.
Answers
Open-ended Free-form text, documents, designs or media judged as a whole.
2
Models scored in lab cards
2
Launch posts list it, from 1 lab
2
System cards report it, from 1 lab

LongCat-Flash-Chat leads with 43%

Best score per model as labs report them in their own cards. Labs pick their own settings, so these compare less cleanly than independent runs.

  1. 1 LongCat-Flash-Chat 43%
  2. 2 LongCat-Flash-Omni 39%
#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 LongCat-Flash-Chat 43% Aug 2025 Model card
2 LongCat-Flash-Omni 39% Oct 2025 Model card

Number one over time

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.

Meituan
Lab claims Not tested since Oct 2025

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

Reported by the lab in its model card
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) LongCat-Flash-Chat 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) LongCat-Flash-Chat

No launch post has listed it since Oct 2025

Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.

Meituan
DateLaunch postScoreAs the post writes it
31 Oct 2025 LongCat-Flash-Omni 39 Meeseeks-zh(acc)
29 Aug 2025 LongCat-Flash-Chat 43 Meeseeks-zh(acc)

2 system cards report it, from 1 lab

Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.

DateDocumentScoreAs the document writes itSection
31 Oct 2025 LongCat-Flash-Omni technical report 39 Meeseeks-zh (acc) (Table 13) Capabilities
1 Sep 2025 LongCat-Flash-Chat technical report 43 Meeseeks-zh (acc) (Table 3) Capabilities

More in Instructions and chat

All 76 in Instructions and chat
  • IFEval In use Models answer about 500 prompts containing verifiable instructions such as word limits or required keywords. Code checks each instruction for strict and loose accuracy. Gemma 4 31B IT 98.9%
  • IFBench In use 58 new out-of-domain verifiable output constraints. Scored by programmatic constraint checks (strict or loose). Nemotron-Cascade 2 30B-A3B 82.9%
  • MultiChallenge In use Multi-turn conversations testing instruction retention, inference memory, versioned editing and self-coherence. Graded by LLM judge with rubrics. GPT-6.1 Sol 82%
  • Multi-IF In use Models follow verifiable instructions over three-turn conversations in eight languages, extending IFEval. Scored by instruction accuracy at each turn. LFM3-1.7B 89.1%
  • AdvancedIF In use Models respond to over 1,600 prompts with complex, multi-turn, and system-level instructions. A judge model checks each response against expert-written rubrics. MAI-Thinking-1 85%
  • IFStruct In use Models generate JSON or YAML that must follow a requested schema and phrasing constraints, without constrained decoding. A response passes only if every structural constraint holds. LFM3-1.7B 93.7%