AdvancedIF
Models respond to over 1,600 prompts with complex, multi-turn, and system-level instructions. A judge model checks each response against expert-written rubrics.
In the authors’ words
Recent progress in large language models (LLMs) has led to impressive performance on a range of tasks, yet advanced instruction following (IF)-especially for complex, multi-turn, and system-prompted instructions-remains a significant challenge. Rigorous evaluation and effective training for such capabilities are hindered by the lack of high-quality, human-annotated benchmarks and reliable, interpretable reward signals. In this work, we introduce AdvancedIF (we will release this benchmark soon), a comprehensive benchmark featuring over 1,600 prompts and expert-curated rubrics that assess LLMs ability to follow complex, multi-turn, and system-level instructions. We further propose RIFL (Rubric-based Instruction-Following Learning), a novel post-training pipeline that leverages rubric generation, a finetuned rubric verifier, and reward shaping to enable effective reinforcement learning for instruction following. Extensive experiments demonstrate that RIFL substantially improves the instruction-following abilities of LLMs, achieving a 6.7% absolute gain on AdvancedIF and strong results on public benchmarks. Our ablation studies confirm the effectiveness of each component in RIFL. This work establishes rubrics as a powerful tool for both training and evaluating advanced IF in LLMs, paving the way for more capable and reliable AI systems.
- Level
- Everyday Most adults, without training
- Scored
- Graded by a model A language model scores each response, usually against a rubric.
- Answers
- Open-ended Free-form text, documents, designs or media judged as a whole.
MAI-Thinking-1 leads with 85% among models released by Sep 2026
Best score per model as labs report them in their own cards. Labs pick their own settings, so these compare less cleanly than independent runs.
The newest model with a score here came out in Sep 2026, and nobody has reported a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:
- Claude Opus 5.5
- GPT-6.1 Terra
- GPT-6.1 Sol
- Claude Sonnet 5.5
- and 16 more
- 1
MAI-Thinking-1 85%
- 2
Tencent Hy3 preview 79.5%
- 3 Kimi K2.5 75.6%
- 4
ERNIE 5.1 72.3%
- 5
Intern-S2-397B 71.6%
- 6
MAI-Code-1-Flash 71.4%
| # | Model | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | | 85% | Jun 2026 | Model card | |
| 2 | | 79.5% | Apr 2026 | Model card | |
| 3 | Kimi K2.5 | 75.6% | Jan 2026 | Model card | |
| 4 | | 72.3% | May 2026 | Model card | |
| 5 | | 71.6% | Sep 2026 | Model card | |
| 6 | | 71.4% | Jun 2026 | Model card |
3 models have held number one since its release in Nov 2025
Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.
The best score passed 85% in Jun 2026
All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.
2 labs put it in a launch post in the last six months
Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.
| Date | Launch post | Score | As the post writes it |
|---|---|---|---|
| 13 Sep 2026 | 71.6 | AdvancedIF | |
| 2 Jun 2026 | 71.4 | Advanced IF (average) | |
| 2 Jun 2026 | 85 | Adv. IF | |
| 9 May 2026 | 72.3 | AdvanceIF (acc) | |
| 23 Apr 2026 | 79.5 | AdvancedIF (CIF&CC subsets) |
3 system cards report it, from 2 labs
Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.
| Date | Document | Score | As the document writes it | Section |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 Jun 2026 | | 85 | Adv. IF, rubric-level score (Table 12, rounded) | Capabilities |
| 2 Jun 2026 | | 71.4 | Advanced IF, rubric-based, average (Instruction following table) | Capabilities |
| 30 Jan 2026 | Kimi K2.5 technical report | 75.6 | AdvancedIF (Table 4) | Capabilities |
More in Instructions and chat
- IFEval In use Models answer about 500 prompts containing verifiable instructions such as word limits or required keywords. Code checks each instruction for strict and loose accuracy.
Gemma 4 31B IT 98.9%
- IFBench In use 58 new out-of-domain verifiable output constraints. Scored by programmatic constraint checks (strict or loose).
Nemotron-Cascade 2 30B-A3B 82.9%
- MultiChallenge In use Multi-turn conversations testing instruction retention, inference memory, versioned editing and self-coherence. Graded by LLM judge with rubrics. GPT-6.1 Sol 82%
- Multi-IF In use Models follow verifiable instructions over three-turn conversations in eight languages, extending IFEval. Scored by instruction accuracy at each turn. LFM3-1.7B 89.1%
- IFStruct In use Models generate JSON or YAML that must follow a requested schema and phrasing constraints, without constrained decoding. A response passes only if every structural constraint holds. LFM3-1.7B 93.7%
- NV Chat Benchmark In use Models answer chat prompts from an internal NVIDIA set. The Nemotron 3.5 Super VL card labels the score an LMArena v3 proxy.
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 52.7