Benchmark Almanac

MCP-Universe

Gemini 3 Pro 44.6% leads since Nov 2025 Fading

Agents complete tasks through 11 real MCP servers across six domains, such as navigation, repositories, finance, and browsing. Scored by execution-based success rate.

In the authors’ words

The Model Context Protocol has emerged as a transformative standard for connecting large language models to external data sources and tools, rapidly gaining adoption across major AI providers and development platforms. However, existing benchmarks are overly simplistic and fail to capture real application challenges such as long-horizon reasoning and large, unfamiliar tool spaces. To address this critical gap, we introduce MCP-Universe, the first comprehensive benchmark specifically designed to evaluate LLMs in realistic and hard tasks through interaction with real-world MCP servers. Our benchmark encompasses 6 core domains spanning 11 different MCP servers: Location Navigation, Repository Management, Financial Analysis, 3D Design, Browser Automation, and Web Searching. To ensure rigorous evaluation, we implement execution-based evaluators, including format evaluators for agent format compliance, static evaluators for time-invariant content matching, and dynamic evaluators that automatically retrieve real-time ground truth for temporally sensitive tasks. Through extensive evaluation of leading LLMs, we find that even SOTA models such as GPT-5 (43.72%), Grok-4 (33.33%) and Claude-4.0-Sonnet (29.44%) exhibit significant performance limitations. In addition, our benchmark poses a significant long-context challenge for LLM agents, as the number of input tokens increases rapidly with the number of interaction steps. Moreover, it introduces an unknown-tools challenge, as LLM agents often lack familiarity with the precise usage of the MCP servers. Notably, enterprise-level agents like Cursor cannot achieve better performance than standard ReAct frameworks. Beyond evaluation, we open-source our extensible evaluation framework with UI support, enabling researchers and practitioners to seamlessly integrate new agents and MCP servers while fostering innovation in the rapidly evolving MCP ecosystem.

Abstract of MCP-Universe: Benchmarking Large Language Models with Real-World Model Context Protocol Servers (arXiv:2508.14704, CC0)
Made by Salesforce AI Research Released Aug 2025 Apps and MCP servers All tasks public Last in a launch post Dec 2025 , dropped before it saturated Last model added Dec 2025 Scores refreshed 2 Nov 2026
Level
University Undergraduates and entry-level professionals
Scored
Checked automatically A program checks the result against an answer key, unit tests or the expected final state.
Answers
Agent task Many steps in a terminal, browser, desktop, app, game or robot.
31
Entries on its own leaderboard, 30 models we track
1
Launch post lists it, from 1 lab
1
System card reports it, from 1 lab

Gemini 3 Pro leads with 44.6% among models released by Nov 2025

Best score per entry from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on 2 Nov 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Names in gray aren't in our model list: fine-tunes, agent systems, products and older models. They don't count toward leaders.

The newest model with a score here came out in Nov 2025, and nobody has tested a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:

  1. 1 Gemini 3 Pro 44.6%
  2. 2 GPT-5 high 44.2%
  3. 3 Grok 4.1 Fast 40.7%
  4. 4 Claude Sonnet 4.5 35.1%
  5. 5 Grok 4 33.3%
  6. 6 Claude Sonnet 4 32.9%
  7. 7 Grok 4 Fast 32.5%
  8. 8 Claude Opus 4.1 29.4%
  9. 9 Claude Opus 4 28.1%
  10. 10 o3 medium 26.4%
  11. 11 grok-code-fast-1 26.4%
  12. 12 Kimi K2 Sep 2025, thinking 26.4%
  13. 13 Claude Haiku 4.5 26.4%
  14. 14 o4-mini medium 26%
  15. 15 GLM-4.6 26%
  16. 16 gpt-oss-120b 25.5%
  17. 17 GLM-4.5 24.7%
  18. 18 Claude 3.7 Sonnet 24.2%
  19. 19 Qwen3-Coder-480B-A35B 22.9%
  20. 20 Gemini 2.5 Pro Jun 2025 22.1%
  21. 21 DeepSeek-V3.1 22.1%
  22. 22 DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus 21.6%
  23. 23 Gemini 2.5 Flash Sep 2025 21.6%
  24. 24 GPT-4.1 19.9%
  25. 25 DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp 19.9%
  26. 26 GLM-4.5-Air 19.5%
  27. 27 Kimi K2 Jul 2025 19.1%
  28. 28 Qwen3-Max-Preview (Instruct) 18.2%
  29. 29 Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct Jul 2025 18.2%
  30. 30 GPT-4o Aug 2024 15.6%
  31. 31 DeepSeek-V3 Mar 2025 14.3%
#EntryScoreSettingDateSource
1 Gemini 3 Pro 44.6% native function calling Nov 2025 Official leaderboard
2 GPT-5 44.2% high, ReAct Aug 2025 Official leaderboard
3 Grok 4.1 Fast 40.7% native function calling Nov 2025 Official leaderboard
4 Claude Sonnet 4.5 35.1% native function calling Sep 2025 Official leaderboard
5 Grok 4 33.3% ReAct Jul 2025 Official leaderboard
6 Claude Sonnet 4 32.9% native function calling May 2025 Official leaderboard
7 Grok 4 Fast 32.5% native function calling Sep 2025 Official leaderboard
8 Claude Opus 4.1 29.4% ReAct Aug 2025 Official leaderboard
9 Claude Opus 4 28.1% ReAct May 2025 Official leaderboard
10 o3 26.4% medium, ReAct Apr 2025 Official leaderboard
11 grok-code-fast-1 26.4% ReAct Aug 2025 Official leaderboard
12 Kimi K2 Sep 2025 26.4% thinking, native function calling Sep 2025 Official leaderboard
13 Claude Haiku 4.5 26.4% native function calling Oct 2025 Official leaderboard
14 o4-mini 26% medium, ReAct Apr 2025 Official leaderboard
15 GLM-4.6 26% ReAct Sep 2025 Official leaderboard
16 gpt-oss-120b 25.5% native function calling Aug 2025 Official leaderboard
17 GLM-4.5 24.7% ReAct Aug 2025 Official leaderboard
18 Claude 3.7 Sonnet 24.2% ReAct Feb 2025 Official leaderboard
19 Qwen3-Coder-480B-A35B 22.9% ReAct Jul 2025 Official leaderboard
20 Gemini 2.5 Pro Jun 2025 22.1% ReAct Jun 2025 Official leaderboard
21 DeepSeek-V3.1 22.1% ReAct Aug 2025 Official leaderboard
22 DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus 21.6% ReAct Sep 2025 Official leaderboard
23 Gemini 2.5 Flash Sep 2025 21.6% ReAct Sep 2025 Official leaderboard
24 GPT-4.1 19.9% native function calling Apr 2025 Official leaderboard
25 DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp 19.9% ReAct Sep 2025 Official leaderboard
26 GLM-4.5-Air 19.5% ReAct Jul 2025 Official leaderboard
27 Kimi K2 Jul 2025 19.1% ReAct Jul 2025 Official leaderboard
28 Qwen3-Max-Preview (Instruct) 18.2% ReAct Official leaderboard
29 Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct Jul 2025 18.2% ReAct Jul 2025 Official leaderboard
30 GPT-4o Aug 2024 15.6% ReAct Aug 2024 Official leaderboard
31 DeepSeek-V3 Mar 2025 14.3% ReAct Mar 2025 Official leaderboard

Labs report scores for 1 model in their cards. We plot every source in the charts below.

3 models have held number one since its release in Aug 2025

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.

xAI OpenAI Google DeepMind
Own leaderboard Not tested since Nov 2025
Gemini 3 Pro 44.6%

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

On the benchmark’s own leaderboard Reported by the lab in its model card Best so far
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2025 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) DeepSeek-V3.2 GPT-5 Grok 4 o3 GPT-4o 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2025 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) DeepSeek-V3.2 Grok 4

Labs headline it less often now, last in Dec 2025

Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.

DeepSeek
DateLaunch postScoreAs the post writes it
1 Dec 2025 DeepSeek-V3.2 45.9 MCP-Universe (Success Rate)

One system card reports it

Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.

DateDocumentScoreAs the document writes itSection
1 Dec 2025 DeepSeek-V3.2 technical report 45.9 MCP-Universe (Success Rate), internal environment, DeepSeek-V3.2 Thinking (Table 2) Capabilities

More in Tool use

All 125 in Tool use
  • AutomationBench In use Agent completes end-to-end business workflows inside a simulated company exposing dozens of REST APIs. Graded on resulting state. Gemini 4 Carbon 53.9%
  • MCP Atlas In use Multi-step workflows over real MCP servers. Scores tool-use competency on realistic tasks. Muse Spark 1.1 88.1%
  • BFCL V4 In use Models call functions and tools, including multi-turn agentic tasks with web search and memory. Checked against expected calls and outcomes. Qwen3.7-Max 75%
  • τ³-bench Banking In use Agents act as banking customer-service reps over many turns with a simulated user, following policy. Pass^1 on the final database state. Qwen 3.8 Max 55.1%
  • Claw-Eval In use 300 human-verified agent tasks (service orchestration, multimodal, multi-turn dialogue) audited via traces and snapshots. Rubric scores with Pass^3 consistency. Claude Sonnet 4.6 81.4%
  • DeepSearchQA In use Questions that need multi-step search and synthesis. Final answers graded against references. Kimi K3 95%