MCP-Universe
Agents complete tasks through 11 real MCP servers across six domains, such as navigation, repositories, finance, and browsing. Scored by execution-based success rate.
In the authors’ words
The Model Context Protocol has emerged as a transformative standard for connecting large language models to external data sources and tools, rapidly gaining adoption across major AI providers and development platforms. However, existing benchmarks are overly simplistic and fail to capture real application challenges such as long-horizon reasoning and large, unfamiliar tool spaces. To address this critical gap, we introduce MCP-Universe, the first comprehensive benchmark specifically designed to evaluate LLMs in realistic and hard tasks through interaction with real-world MCP servers. Our benchmark encompasses 6 core domains spanning 11 different MCP servers: Location Navigation, Repository Management, Financial Analysis, 3D Design, Browser Automation, and Web Searching. To ensure rigorous evaluation, we implement execution-based evaluators, including format evaluators for agent format compliance, static evaluators for time-invariant content matching, and dynamic evaluators that automatically retrieve real-time ground truth for temporally sensitive tasks. Through extensive evaluation of leading LLMs, we find that even SOTA models such as GPT-5 (43.72%), Grok-4 (33.33%) and Claude-4.0-Sonnet (29.44%) exhibit significant performance limitations. In addition, our benchmark poses a significant long-context challenge for LLM agents, as the number of input tokens increases rapidly with the number of interaction steps. Moreover, it introduces an unknown-tools challenge, as LLM agents often lack familiarity with the precise usage of the MCP servers. Notably, enterprise-level agents like Cursor cannot achieve better performance than standard ReAct frameworks. Beyond evaluation, we open-source our extensible evaluation framework with UI support, enabling researchers and practitioners to seamlessly integrate new agents and MCP servers while fostering innovation in the rapidly evolving MCP ecosystem.
- Level
- University Undergraduates and entry-level professionals
- Scored
- Checked automatically A program checks the result against an answer key, unit tests or the expected final state.
- Answers
- Agent task Many steps in a terminal, browser, desktop, app, game or robot.
Gemini 3 Pro leads with 44.6% among models released by Nov 2025
Best score per entry from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on 2 Nov 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Names in gray aren't in our model list: fine-tunes, agent systems, products and older models. They don't count toward leaders.
The newest model with a score here came out in Nov 2025, and nobody has tested a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:
- GPT-6 Astra
- Claude Opus 5.5
- GPT-6.1 Terra
- GPT-6.1 Sol
- and 16 more
- 44.6
Gemini 3 Pro
- 44.2 GPT-5
- 40.7 Grok 4.1 Fast
- 35.1 Claude Sonnet 4.5
- 33.3 Grok 4
- 32.9 Claude Sonnet 4
- 32.5 Grok 4 Fast
- 29.4 Claude Opus 4.1
- 28.1 Claude Opus 4
- 26.4 o3
- 26.4 grok-code-fast-1
- 26.4 Kimi K2
- 26.4 Claude Haiku 4.5
- 26.0 o4-mini
- 26.0 GLM-4.6
- 25.5 gpt-oss-120b
- 24.7 GLM-4.5
- 24.2 Claude 3.7 Sonnet
- 22.9
Qwen3-Coder-480B-A35B
- 22.1
Gemini 2.5 Pro
- 22.1
DeepSeek-V3.1
- 21.6
DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus
- 21.6
Gemini 2.5 Flash
- 19.9 GPT-4.1
- 19.9
DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp
- 19.5 GLM-4.5-Air
- 19.1 Kimi K2
- 18.2 Qwen3-Max-Preview (Instruct)
- 18.2
Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct
- 15.6 GPT-4o
- 14.3
DeepSeek-V3
- 1
Gemini 3 Pro 44.6%
- 2 GPT-5 high 44.2%
- 3 Grok 4.1 Fast 40.7%
- 4 Claude Sonnet 4.5 35.1%
- 5 Grok 4 33.3%
- 6 Claude Sonnet 4 32.9%
- 7 Grok 4 Fast 32.5%
- 8 Claude Opus 4.1 29.4%
- 9 Claude Opus 4 28.1%
- 10 o3 medium 26.4%
- 11 grok-code-fast-1 26.4%
- 12 Kimi K2 Sep 2025, thinking 26.4%
- 13 Claude Haiku 4.5 26.4%
- 14 o4-mini medium 26%
- 15 GLM-4.6 26%
- 16 gpt-oss-120b 25.5%
- 17 GLM-4.5 24.7%
- 18 Claude 3.7 Sonnet 24.2%
- 19
Qwen3-Coder-480B-A35B 22.9%
- 20
Gemini 2.5 Pro Jun 2025 22.1%
- 21
DeepSeek-V3.1 22.1%
- 22
DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus 21.6%
- 23
Gemini 2.5 Flash Sep 2025 21.6%
- 24 GPT-4.1 19.9%
- 25
DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp 19.9%
- 26 GLM-4.5-Air 19.5%
- 27 Kimi K2 Jul 2025 19.1%
- 28 Qwen3-Max-Preview (Instruct) 18.2%
- 29
Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct Jul 2025 18.2%
- 30 GPT-4o Aug 2024 15.6%
- 31
DeepSeek-V3 Mar 2025 14.3%
| # | Entry | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | | 44.6% | native function calling | Nov 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 2 | GPT-5 | 44.2% | high, ReAct | Aug 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 3 | Grok 4.1 Fast | 40.7% | native function calling | Nov 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 4 | Claude Sonnet 4.5 | 35.1% | native function calling | Sep 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 5 | Grok 4 | 33.3% | ReAct | Jul 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 6 | Claude Sonnet 4 | 32.9% | native function calling | May 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 7 | Grok 4 Fast | 32.5% | native function calling | Sep 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 8 | Claude Opus 4.1 | 29.4% | ReAct | Aug 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 9 | Claude Opus 4 | 28.1% | ReAct | May 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 10 | o3 | 26.4% | medium, ReAct | Apr 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 11 | grok-code-fast-1 | 26.4% | ReAct | Aug 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 12 | Kimi K2 Sep 2025 | 26.4% | thinking, native function calling | Sep 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 13 | Claude Haiku 4.5 | 26.4% | native function calling | Oct 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 14 | o4-mini | 26% | medium, ReAct | Apr 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 15 | GLM-4.6 | 26% | ReAct | Sep 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 16 | gpt-oss-120b | 25.5% | native function calling | Aug 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 17 | GLM-4.5 | 24.7% | ReAct | Aug 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 18 | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | 24.2% | ReAct | Feb 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 19 | | 22.9% | ReAct | Jul 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 20 | | 22.1% | ReAct | Jun 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 21 | | 22.1% | ReAct | Aug 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 22 | | 21.6% | ReAct | Sep 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 23 | | 21.6% | ReAct | Sep 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 24 | GPT-4.1 | 19.9% | native function calling | Apr 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 25 | | 19.9% | ReAct | Sep 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 26 | GLM-4.5-Air | 19.5% | ReAct | Jul 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 27 | Kimi K2 Jul 2025 | 19.1% | ReAct | Jul 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 28 | Qwen3-Max-Preview (Instruct) | 18.2% | ReAct | Official leaderboard | |
| 29 | | 18.2% | ReAct | Jul 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 30 | GPT-4o Aug 2024 | 15.6% | ReAct | Aug 2024 | Official leaderboard |
| 31 | | 14.3% | ReAct | Mar 2025 | Official leaderboard |
Labs report scores for 1 model in their cards. We plot every source in the charts below.
3 models have held number one since its release in Aug 2025
Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.
Scores over time
All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.
Labs headline it less often now, last in Dec 2025
Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.
| Date | Launch post | Score | As the post writes it |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 Dec 2025 | 45.9 | MCP-Universe (Success Rate) |
One system card reports it
Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.
| Date | Document | Score | As the document writes it | Section |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 Dec 2025 | | 45.9 | MCP-Universe (Success Rate), internal environment, DeepSeek-V3.2 Thinking (Table 2) | Capabilities |
More in Tool use
- AutomationBench In use Agent completes end-to-end business workflows inside a simulated company exposing dozens of REST APIs. Graded on resulting state.
Gemini 4 Carbon 53.9%
- MCP Atlas In use Multi-step workflows over real MCP servers. Scores tool-use competency on realistic tasks.
Muse Spark 1.1 88.1%
- BFCL V4 In use Models call functions and tools, including multi-turn agentic tasks with web search and memory. Checked against expected calls and outcomes.
Qwen3.7-Max 75%
- τ³-bench Banking In use Agents act as banking customer-service reps over many turns with a simulated user, following policy. Pass^1 on the final database state.
Qwen 3.8 Max 55.1%
- Claw-Eval In use 300 human-verified agent tasks (service orchestration, multimodal, multi-turn dialogue) audited via traces and snapshots. Rubric scores with Pass^3 consistency. Claude Sonnet 4.6 81.4%
- DeepSearchQA In use Questions that need multi-step search and synthesis. Final answers graded against references. Kimi K3 95%