Llama 2-Chat safety human evaluation (Meta)
Only in system cards
Human raters score responses to about 2,000 adversarial prompts on a five-point scale. Ratings of 1 or 2 count as violations.
In-house Meta evaluation. The paper shows violation percentage and mean rating only in charts.
Made by Meta Released Jul 2023 Refusing harmful requests Tasks kept private Last in a system card Jul 2023
Last model added Jul 2023
- Scored
- Graded by people Human experts grade or compare the outputs.
- Answers
- Open-ended Free-form text, documents, designs or media judged as a whole.
4
System cards report it, from 1 lab
No scores here yet
No lab, leaderboard or Epoch AI run has reported a score for Llama 2-Chat safety human evaluation (Meta) yet.
Labs report it only in system cards
We read the headline results of 479 launch posts from 51 labs, and none of them list this benchmark. Some system cards do, below.
4 system cards report it, from 1 lab
Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.
| Date | Document | Score | As the document writes it | Section |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19 Jul 2023 |  Llama 2-7B technical report | Llama 2-Chat 7B overall violation percentage and mean rating, charts with no printed values (Figures 17 to 19) | Safety | |
| 19 Jul 2023 | Llama 2-70B technical report | Llama 2-Chat 70B overall violation percentage and mean rating, charts with no printed values (Figures 17 to 19) | Safety | |
| 19 Jul 2023 | Llama 2-34B technical report | Llama 2-Chat 34B overall violation percentage and mean rating, charts with no printed values (Figures 17 to 19) | Safety | |
| 19 Jul 2023 | Llama 2-13B technical report | Llama 2-Chat 13B overall violation percentage and mean rating, charts with no printed values (Figures 17 to 19) | Safety |
More in Safety and alignment
- FORTRESS In use Paired adversarial and benign national-security misuse prompts. Rubric-graded risk score on adversarial and over-refusal score on benign prompts. Claude Opus 5.5 5.78%
- StrongREJECT In use Forbidden-prompt jailbreak benchmark with a rubric grader that scores how useful a non-refusal actually is.
Inkling 98.6% - AgentDojo In use Agents do tool-use tasks while tools and data carry prompt injections. Attack success rate counts hijacked runs. Grok 4 Fast 0%
- MASK In use Measures whether a model contradicts its own elicited beliefs under pressure to lie. Honesty separated from accuracy. Muse Spark Open 98.1%
- Gray Swan IPI Arena benchmark In use Indirect prompt-injection attacks from public red-teaming competitions replayed on tool, coding and browser agents. Attack success rate at k attempts. GPT-6 Astra 8.50%
- Agentic misalignment suite (Anthropic) In use Agents in simulated company settings face threats or goal conflicts that invite blackmail, leaking or sabotage. Score is the misaligned action rate. Claude Sonnet 4.5 0%