LiveClawBench
Agents act as OpenClaw personal assistants on 134 multi-step tasks across 10 app domains backed by stateful mock services. A run passes when its reward exceeds 0.8.
The paper evaluates 17 agents from eight model families, three runs per case, using the Harbor framework. Tasks include 12 safety cases and are labeled Easy, Medium or Hard.
In the authors’ words
OpenClaw-style personal assistants extend LLM agents from isolated tool use to open-ended, stateful, and personalized software environments. Evaluating these assistants is fundamentally a fidelity problem: benchmarks must be faithful both to the distribution of real assistant tasks and to the execution semantics of the environments in which those tasks unfold. Existing benchmarks often lose fidelity in one dimension or the other. Their task distributions are shaped by what is easy to isolate, mock, and verify, underrepresenting real-world difficulties such as cross-service dependency, contaminated state, implicit intent, and runtime change. Their environments are either live but hard to reproduce, or reproducible but reduced to endpoint-level stubs that remove sessions, artifacts, state transitions, and downstream side effects. We introduce LiveClawBench, a benchmark designed around this dual-fidelity requirement. LiveClawBench combines a Triple-Axis Complexity Framework for difficulty-driven task construction with reproducible full-stack mock applications that preserve stateful execution semantics. With 134 executable cases across 10 domains with 22 mocked services, LiveClawBench supports controlled, extensible, and factor-level diagnostic evaluation of realistic agentic tasks. We release the benchmark resources: (1) Benchmark: https://github.com/Mosi-AI/LiveClawBench; (2) Leaderboard: https://mosi-ai.github.io/LiveClawBench/leaderboard/; (3) Trajectories: https://huggingface.co/datasets/Mosi-AI/LiveClawbench-trajectories
- Level
- Expert Specialists with years of training, often over hours of work
- Scored
- Checked automatically A program checks the result against an answer key, unit tests or the expected final state.
- Answers
- Agent task Many steps in a terminal, browser, desktop, app, game or robot.
Kimi K2.7 Code leads with 76% among models released by Jun 2026
Best score per model from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on 2 Nov 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best.
The newest model with a score here came out in Jun 2026, and nobody has tested a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:
- GPT-6 Astra
- Claude Opus 5.5
- GPT-6.1 Terra
- GPT-6.1 Sol
- and 14 more
- 76.0 Kimi K2.7 Code
- 74.7 GLM-5.1
- 74.5 GPT-5.5
- 72.9 GLM-5.2
- 71.4
MiniMax-M3
- 70.6
Qwen 3.6 Plus
- 70.6 MiMo-V2.5-Pro
- 70.2
Qwen 3.6 Flash
- 68.8 Claude Opus 4.8
- 68.6 Kimi K2.6
- 68.4
MiniMax-M2.7
- 65.6
DeepSeek-V4-Pro
- 60.5
DeepSeek-V4-Flash
- 57.0
Qwen3.5 397B-A17B
- 54.5
Qwen3.6 27B
- 54.0
Qwen3.5-Flash
- 31.6
Qwen3.5-27B
- 1 Kimi K2.7 Code 76%
- 2 GLM-5.1 74.7%
- 3 GPT-5.5 74.5%
- 4 GLM-5.2 72.9%
- 5
MiniMax-M3 71.4%
- 6
Qwen 3.6 Plus 70.6%
- 7 MiMo-V2.5-Pro 70.6%
- 8
Qwen 3.6 Flash 70.2%
- 9 Claude Opus 4.8 68.8%
- 10 Kimi K2.6 68.6%
- 11
MiniMax-M2.7 68.4%
- 12
DeepSeek-V4-Pro 65.6%
- 13
DeepSeek-V4-Flash 60.5%
- 14
Qwen3.5 397B-A17B 57%
- 15
Qwen3.6 27B 54.5%
- 16
Qwen3.5-Flash 54%
- 17
Qwen3.5-27B 31.6%
| # | Model | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Kimi K2.7 Code | 76% | Jun 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 2 | GLM-5.1 | 74.7% | Apr 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 3 | GPT-5.5 | 74.5% | Apr 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 4 | GLM-5.2 | 72.9% | Jun 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 5 | | 71.4% | Jun 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 6 | | 70.6% | Mar 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 7 | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | 70.6% | Apr 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 8 | | 70.2% | Apr 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 9 | Claude Opus 4.8 | 68.8% | May 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 10 | Kimi K2.6 | 68.6% | Apr 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 11 | | 68.4% | Mar 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 12 | | 65.6% | Apr 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 13 | | 60.5% | Apr 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 14 | | 57% | Feb 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 15 | | 54.5% | Apr 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 16 | | 54% | Feb 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 17 | | 31.6% | Feb 2026 | Official leaderboard |
Labs report scores for 2 models in their cards. We plot every source in the charts below.
5 models have held number one since its release in Mar 2026
Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.
Scores over time
All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.
One lab put it in a launch post in the last six months
Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.
| Date | Launch post | Score | As the post writes it |
|---|---|---|---|
| 27 Oct 2026 | LFM3-1.7B | 45.6 | LiveClaw (OpenClaw agent, assumed to be LiveClawBench) |
| 13 Oct 2026 | LFM2.5-24B-A2B | 48.1 | LiveClaw (assumed to be LiveClawBench) |
More in Tool use
- AutomationBench In use Agent completes end-to-end business workflows inside a simulated company exposing dozens of REST APIs. Graded on resulting state.
Gemini 4 Carbon 53.9%
- MCP Atlas In use Multi-step workflows over real MCP servers. Scores tool-use competency on realistic tasks.
Muse Spark 1.1 88.1%
- BFCL V4 In use Models call functions and tools, including multi-turn agentic tasks with web search and memory. Checked against expected calls and outcomes.
Qwen3.7-Max 75%
- τ³-bench Banking In use Agents act as banking customer-service reps over many turns with a simulated user, following policy. Pass^1 on the final database state.
Qwen 3.8 Max 55.1%
- Claw-Eval In use 300 human-verified agent tasks (service orchestration, multimodal, multi-turn dialogue) audited via traces and snapshots. Rubric scores with Pass^3 consistency. Claude Sonnet 4.6 81.4%
- DeepSearchQA In use Questions that need multi-step search and synthesis. Final answers graded against references. Kimi K3 95%