KRETA
Models read and reason over Korean text in images across diverse visual contexts. It is a text-rich visual question answering test for Korean.
Published at EMNLP 2025. The leaderboard is a table in the GitHub README.
In the authors’ words
Understanding and reasoning over text within visual contexts poses a significant challenge for Vision-Language Models (VLMs), given the complexity and diversity of real-world scenarios. To address this challenge, text-rich Visual Question Answering (VQA) datasets and benchmarks have emerged for high-resource languages like English. However, a critical gap persists for low-resource languages such as Korean, where the lack of comprehensive benchmarks hinders robust model evaluation and comparison. To bridge this gap, we introduce KRETA, a benchmark for Korean Reading and rEasoning in Text-rich VQA Attuned to diverse visual contexts. KRETA facilitates an in-depth evaluation of both visual text understanding and reasoning capabilities, while also supporting a multifaceted assessment across 15 domains and 26 image types. Additionally, we introduce a semi-automated VQA generation pipeline specifically optimized for text-rich settings, leveraging refined stepwise image decomposition and a rigorous seven-metric evaluation protocol to ensure data quality. While KRETA is tailored for Korean, we hope our adaptable and extensible pipeline will facilitate the development of similar benchmarks in other languages, thereby accelerating multilingual VLM research. The code and dataset for KRETA are available at https://github.com/tabtoyou/KRETA.
- Level
- Everyday Most adults, without training
- Scored
- Checked automatically A program checks the result against an answer key, unit tests or the expected final state.
- Answers
- Multiple choice
Gemini 2.0 Flash leads with 85.4% among models released by Feb 2025
Best score per entry from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on 2 Nov 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Names in gray aren't in our model list: fine-tunes, agent systems, products and older models. They don't count toward leaders.
The newest model with a score here came out in Feb 2025, and nobody has tested a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:
- GPT-6 Astra
- Claude Opus 5.5
- GPT-6.1 Terra
- GPT-6.1 Sol
- and 16 more
- 85.4
Gemini 2.0 Flash
- 84.6 GPT-4o
- 80.5 Claude 3.5 Sonnet (October 2024)
- 78.0 A.X-4.0-VL-LIGHT
- 75.4 VARCO-VISION-2.0 14B
- 75.0 KANANA-1.5-V 3B
- 73.3 GPT-4o mini
- 72.3 VARCO-VISION 14B
- 71.8
Qwen2.5-VL-3B
- 70.8
InternVL2.5-8B
- 70.7
InternVL2.5-4B
- 68.5
Qwen2.5-VL-7B
- 64.3 MiniCPM-o-2_6
- 58.4
Ovis1.6-Gemma2-9B
- 54.0
LLaVA-OneVision 7B
- 53.3
DeepSeek-VL2-Small
- 52.2
Ovis1.6-Llama3.2-3B
- 48.8
DeepSeek-VL2-Tiny
- 42.6 Phi-3.5-vision-instruct
- 42.3
LLaVA-OneVision 0.5B
- 41.0 MiniCPM-V-2_6
- 1
Gemini 2.0 Flash Feb 2025 85.4%
- 2 GPT-4o Nov 2024 84.6%
- 3 Claude 3.5 Sonnet (October 2024) 80.5%
- 4 A.X-4.0-VL-LIGHT 78%
- 5 VARCO-VISION-2.0 14B 75.4%
- 6 KANANA-1.5-V 3B 75%
- 7 GPT-4o mini 73.3%
- 8 VARCO-VISION 14B 72.3%
- 9
Qwen2.5-VL-3B 71.8%
- 10
InternVL2.5-8B 70.8%
- 11
InternVL2.5-4B 70.7%
- 12
Qwen2.5-VL-7B 68.5%
- 13 MiniCPM-o-2_6 64.3%
- 14
Ovis1.6-Gemma2-9B 58.4%
- 15
LLaVA-OneVision 7B 54%
- 16
DeepSeek-VL2-Small 53.3%
- 17
Ovis1.6-Llama3.2-3B 52.2%
- 18
DeepSeek-VL2-Tiny 48.8%
- 19 Phi-3.5-vision-instruct 42.6%
- 20
LLaVA-OneVision 0.5B 42.3%
- 21 MiniCPM-V-2_6 41%
| # | Entry | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | | 85.4% | Feb 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 2 | GPT-4o Nov 2024 | 84.6% | Nov 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 3 | Claude 3.5 Sonnet (October 2024) | 80.5% | Oct 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 4 | A.X-4.0-VL-LIGHT | 78% | Jul 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 5 | VARCO-VISION-2.0 14B | 75.4% | Jul 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 6 | KANANA-1.5-V 3B | 75% | Jul 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 7 | GPT-4o mini | 73.3% | Jul 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 8 | VARCO-VISION 14B | 72.3% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 9 | | 71.8% | Jan 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 10 | | 70.8% | Dec 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 11 | | 70.7% | Dec 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 12 | | 68.5% | Jan 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 13 | MiniCPM-o-2_6 | 64.3% | Jan 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 14 | | 58.4% | Sep 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 15 | | 54% | Aug 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 16 | | 53.3% | Dec 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 17 | | 52.2% | Oct 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 18 | | 48.8% | Dec 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 19 | Phi-3.5-vision-instruct | 42.6% | Aug 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 20 | | 42.3% | Aug 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 21 | MiniCPM-V-2_6 | 41% | Aug 2024 | Official leaderboard |
Labs report scores for 1 model in their cards. We plot every source in the charts below.
Number one over time
Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.
The best score passed 85% in Feb 2025
All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.
Labs headline it less often now, last in Apr 2026
Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.
| Date | Launch post | Score | As the post writes it |
|---|---|---|---|
| 9 Apr 2026 | 91.9 | KRETA |
One system card reports it
Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.
| Date | Document | Score | As the document writes it | Section |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 9 Apr 2026 | | 91.9 | KRETA (Table 2, Reasoning mode) | Capabilities |
More in Vision
- MMMU In use 11.5K college-level multimodal questions across 30 subjects. Multiple-choice and open accuracy. GPT-5.1 85.4%
- MMMU-Pro In use Harder MMMU: college-level multimodal questions with more options and vision-only inputs to remove text shortcuts. Kimi K3.1 Pro 84.1%
- CharXiv In use Chart understanding on real arXiv figures. Reasoning questions require synthesizing information from complex charts. Claude Fable 5 93.5%
- MATH-Vision (MathVision) In use 3,040 competition math problems with visual context. Answer accuracy.
Qwen 3.8 Max 97.7%
- ChartQA In use Models answer human-written and generated questions about chart images that need visual and arithmetic reasoning. Scored by relaxed accuracy with a 5 percent numeric tolerance.
Command A Vision 90.9%
- DocVQA In use Models answer 50,000 questions about 12,000 scanned document images by reading their text and layout. Scoring is ANLS, a string similarity to reference answers.
Seed1.5-VL 96.9%