Benchmark Almanac

KRETA

Gemini 2.0 Flash Feb 2025 85.4% leads since Aug 2025 Fading

Models read and reason over Korean text in images across diverse visual contexts. It is a text-rich visual question answering test for Korean.

Published at EMNLP 2025. The leaderboard is a table in the GitHub README.

In the authors’ words

Understanding and reasoning over text within visual contexts poses a significant challenge for Vision-Language Models (VLMs), given the complexity and diversity of real-world scenarios. To address this challenge, text-rich Visual Question Answering (VQA) datasets and benchmarks have emerged for high-resource languages like English. However, a critical gap persists for low-resource languages such as Korean, where the lack of comprehensive benchmarks hinders robust model evaluation and comparison. To bridge this gap, we introduce KRETA, a benchmark for Korean Reading and rEasoning in Text-rich VQA Attuned to diverse visual contexts. KRETA facilitates an in-depth evaluation of both visual text understanding and reasoning capabilities, while also supporting a multifaceted assessment across 15 domains and 26 image types. Additionally, we introduce a semi-automated VQA generation pipeline specifically optimized for text-rich settings, leveraging refined stepwise image decomposition and a rigorous seven-metric evaluation protocol to ensure data quality. While KRETA is tailored for Korean, we hope our adaptable and extensible pipeline will facilitate the development of similar benchmarks in other languages, thereby accelerating multilingual VLM research. The code and dataset for KRETA are available at https://github.com/tabtoyou/KRETA.

Abstract of KRETA: A Benchmark for Korean Reading and Reasoning in Text-Rich VQA Attuned to Diverse Visual Contexts (arXiv:2508.19944, CC0)
Made by KRETA authors (tabtoyou et al.) Released Aug 2025 Documents, charts and text in images All tasks public Last in a launch post Apr 2026 , dropped after it saturated Last model added Apr 2026 Scores refreshed 2 Nov 2026
Level
Everyday Most adults, without training
Scored
Checked automatically A program checks the result against an answer key, unit tests or the expected final state.
Answers
Multiple choice
21
Entries on its own leaderboard, 17 models we track
1
Launch post lists it, from 1 lab
1
System card reports it, from 1 lab

Gemini 2.0 Flash leads with 85.4% among models released by Feb 2025

Best score per entry from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on 2 Nov 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Names in gray aren't in our model list: fine-tunes, agent systems, products and older models. They don't count toward leaders.

The newest model with a score here came out in Feb 2025, and nobody has tested a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:

  1. 1 Gemini 2.0 Flash Feb 2025 85.4%
  2. 2 GPT-4o Nov 2024 84.6%
  3. 3 Claude 3.5 Sonnet (October 2024) 80.5%
  4. 4 A.X-4.0-VL-LIGHT 78%
  5. 5 VARCO-VISION-2.0 14B 75.4%
  6. 6 KANANA-1.5-V 3B 75%
  7. 7 GPT-4o mini 73.3%
  8. 8 VARCO-VISION 14B 72.3%
  9. 9 Qwen2.5-VL-3B 71.8%
  10. 10 InternVL2.5-8B 70.8%
  11. 11 InternVL2.5-4B 70.7%
  12. 12 Qwen2.5-VL-7B 68.5%
  13. 13 MiniCPM-o-2_6 64.3%
  14. 14 Ovis1.6-Gemma2-9B 58.4%
  15. 15 LLaVA-OneVision 7B 54%
  16. 16 DeepSeek-VL2-Small 53.3%
  17. 17 Ovis1.6-Llama3.2-3B 52.2%
  18. 18 DeepSeek-VL2-Tiny 48.8%
  19. 19 Phi-3.5-vision-instruct 42.6%
  20. 20 LLaVA-OneVision 0.5B 42.3%
  21. 21 MiniCPM-V-2_6 41%
#EntryScoreSettingDateSource
1 Gemini 2.0 Flash Feb 2025 85.4% Feb 2025 Official leaderboard
2 GPT-4o Nov 2024 84.6% Nov 2024 Official leaderboard
3 Claude 3.5 Sonnet (October 2024) 80.5% Oct 2024 Official leaderboard
4 A.X-4.0-VL-LIGHT 78% Jul 2025 Official leaderboard
5 VARCO-VISION-2.0 14B 75.4% Jul 2025 Official leaderboard
6 KANANA-1.5-V 3B 75% Jul 2025 Official leaderboard
7 GPT-4o mini 73.3% Jul 2024 Official leaderboard
8 VARCO-VISION 14B 72.3% Official leaderboard
9 Qwen2.5-VL-3B 71.8% Jan 2025 Official leaderboard
10 InternVL2.5-8B 70.8% Dec 2024 Official leaderboard
11 InternVL2.5-4B 70.7% Dec 2024 Official leaderboard
12 Qwen2.5-VL-7B 68.5% Jan 2025 Official leaderboard
13 MiniCPM-o-2_6 64.3% Jan 2025 Official leaderboard
14 Ovis1.6-Gemma2-9B 58.4% Sep 2024 Official leaderboard
15 LLaVA-OneVision 7B 54% Aug 2024 Official leaderboard
16 DeepSeek-VL2-Small 53.3% Dec 2024 Official leaderboard
17 Ovis1.6-Llama3.2-3B 52.2% Oct 2024 Official leaderboard
18 DeepSeek-VL2-Tiny 48.8% Dec 2024 Official leaderboard
19 Phi-3.5-vision-instruct 42.6% Aug 2024 Official leaderboard
20 LLaVA-OneVision 0.5B 42.3% Aug 2024 Official leaderboard
21 MiniCPM-V-2_6 41% Aug 2024 Official leaderboard

Labs report scores for 1 model in their cards. We plot every source in the charts below.

Number one over time

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.

Google DeepMind
Own leaderboard Passed 85% in Aug 2025, by Gemini 2.0 Flash

The best score passed 85% in Feb 2025

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

On the benchmark’s own leaderboard Reported by the lab in its model card Best so far
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2025 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) EXAONE 4.5 33B Gemini 2.0 Flash Claude 3.5 Sonnet (October 2024) GPT-4o mini 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2025 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) EXAONE 4.5 33B Gemini 2.0 Flash

Labs headline it less often now, last in Apr 2026

Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.

LG AI Research
DateLaunch postScoreAs the post writes it
9 Apr 2026 EXAONE 4.5 33B 91.9 KRETA

One system card reports it

Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.

DateDocumentScoreAs the document writes itSection
9 Apr 2026 EXAONE 4.5 33B technical report 91.9 KRETA (Table 2, Reasoning mode) Capabilities

More in Vision

All 234 in Vision
  • MMMU In use 11.5K college-level multimodal questions across 30 subjects. Multiple-choice and open accuracy. GPT-5.1 85.4%
  • MMMU-Pro In use Harder MMMU: college-level multimodal questions with more options and vision-only inputs to remove text shortcuts. Kimi K3.1 Pro 84.1%
  • CharXiv In use Chart understanding on real arXiv figures. Reasoning questions require synthesizing information from complex charts. Claude Fable 5 93.5%
  • MATH-Vision (MathVision) In use 3,040 competition math problems with visual context. Answer accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 97.7%
  • ChartQA In use Models answer human-written and generated questions about chart images that need visual and arithmetic reasoning. Scored by relaxed accuracy with a 5 percent numeric tolerance. Command A Vision 90.9%
  • DocVQA In use Models answer 50,000 questions about 12,000 scanned document images by reading their text and layout. Scoring is ANLS, a string similarity to reference answers. Seed1.5-VL 96.9%