Kimi Code Bench v2
Coding agents complete Moonshot's realistic tasks from internal engineering work, production incidents, and open-source projects in over ten languages.
In-house: Moonshot never released the tasks, and only Moonshot reports scores on it.
- Level
- Expert Specialists with years of training, often over hours of work
- Scored
- Checked automatically A program checks the result against an answer key, unit tests or the expected final state.
- Answers
- Code A program or patch run against tests.
Kimi K3.1 Pro leads with 77.1%
Best score per model as labs report them in their own cards. Labs pick their own settings, so these compare less cleanly than independent runs.
- 1 Kimi K3.1 Pro 77.1%
- 2 Kimi K3 72.9%
- 3 Kimi K2.7 Code 62%
| # | Model | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Kimi K3.1 Pro | 77.1% | Oct 2026 | Model card | |
| 2 | Kimi K3 | 72.9% | Jul 2026 | Model card | |
| 3 | Kimi K2.7 Code | 62% | Jun 2026 | Model card |
3 models have held number one since its release in Jun 2026
Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.
Scores over time
All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.
One lab put it in a launch post in the last six months
Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.
| Date | Launch post | Score | As the post writes it |
|---|---|---|---|
| 24 Oct 2026 | Kimi K3.1 Pro | 77.1 | Kimi Code Bench 2.0 (Internal) |
| 16 Jul 2026 | Kimi K3 | 72.9 | Kimi Code Bench 2.0 |
| 12 Jun 2026 | Kimi K2.7 Code | 62 | Kimi Code Bench v2 |
One system card reports it
Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.
| Date | Document | Score | As the document writes it | Section |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 27 Jul 2026 | Kimi K3 technical report | 72.9 | Kimi Code Bench 2.0 with Kimi Code harness, as in Figure 1. 73.7 with Claude Code harness (Table 3) | Capabilities |
More in Coding
- SWE-bench Verified In use 500 human-validated GitHub issues from 12 Python repos. Agent writes a patch that must pass hidden tests. Claude Opus 4.7 83.5%
- SWE-bench Multilingual In use 300 GitHub-issue tasks across nine programming languages in SWE-bench format. Patch graded by repository tests. Claude Opus 5.5 93.9%
- LiveCodeBench v6 In use Competitive programming problems collected after model cutoffs from LeetCode, AtCoder, Codeforces. Scored pass@1 on hidden tests.
DeepSeek-V4-Pro 93.5%
- DeepSWE In use 113 original long-horizon engineering tasks across 91 repos and five languages, written from scratch. Hand-written verifiers accept alternative solutions. GPT-6 Astra 74.1%
- SciCode In use Scientist-curated research coding problems split into subproblems across natural sciences. Code checked against test cases.
Seed2.1 Pro 59.8%
- Codeforces rating In use Model solves recent Codeforces contest problems. An Elo-style rating is computed from simulated contest performance.
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 3,471