Benchmark Almanac

Kernel Bench L3

Qwen3.7-Plus 2.06 Fading

Models write fast GPU kernels for the 50 full model architectures in KernelBench Level 3. Scored on correctness and speedup over PyTorch.

This is the hardest of the three original KernelBench levels, which cover single operators, fusions, and full models.

In the authors’ words

Efficient GPU kernels are crucial for building performant machine learning architectures, but writing them is a time-consuming challenge that requires significant expertise; therefore, we explore using language models (LMs) to automate kernel generation. We introduce KernelBench, an open-source framework for evaluating LMs' ability to write fast and correct kernels on a suite of 250 carefully selected PyTorch ML workloads. KernelBench represents a real-world engineering environment and making progress on the introduced benchmark directly translates to faster practical kernels. We introduce a new evaluation metric fast_p, which measures the percentage of generated kernels that are functionally correct and offer a speedup greater than an adjustable threshold p over baseline. Our experiments across various state-of-the-art models and test-time methods show that frontier reasoning models perform the best out of the box but still fall short overall, matching the PyTorch baseline in less than 20% of the cases. While we show that results can improve by leveraging execution and profiling feedback during iterative refinement, KernelBench remains a challenging benchmark, with its difficulty increasing as we raise speedup threshold p.

Abstract of KernelBench: Can LLMs Write Efficient GPU Kernels? (arXiv:2502.10517, CC0)
Made by Stanford Scaling Intelligence Lab Released Dec 2024 Speed and optimization All tasks public Last in a launch post Jun 2026 , dropped before it saturated Last model added Jun 2026
Level
Expert Specialists with years of training, often over hours of work
Scored
Checked automatically A program checks the result against an answer key, unit tests or the expected final state.
Answers
Code A program or patch run against tests.
2
Models scored in lab cards
2
Launch posts list it, from 1 lab

Qwen3.7-Plus leads with 2.06

Best score per model as labs report them in their own cards. Labs pick their own settings, so these compare less cleanly than independent runs.

  1. 1 Qwen3.7-Plus 2.06
  2. 2 Qwen3.7-Max 1.98
#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 Qwen3.7-Plus 2.06 Jun 2026 Model card
2 Qwen3.7-Max 1.98 May 2026 Model card

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

Reported by the lab in its model card
1.98 2.00 2.02 2.04 2.06 2026 1.98 2.00 2.02 2.04 2.06 2026

Labs headline it less often now, last in Jun 2026

Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.

Qwen
DateLaunch postScoreAs the post writes it
1 Jun 2026 Qwen3.7-Plus 2.06 Kernel Bench L3 2.06/98% (median speedup / share faster than torch.compile)
20 May 2026 Qwen3.7-Max 1.98 Kernel Bench L3

More in Coding

All 243 in Coding
  • SWE-bench Verified In use 500 human-validated GitHub issues from 12 Python repos. Agent writes a patch that must pass hidden tests. Claude Opus 4.7 83.5%
  • SWE-bench Multilingual In use 300 GitHub-issue tasks across nine programming languages in SWE-bench format. Patch graded by repository tests. Claude Opus 5.5 93.9%
  • LiveCodeBench v6 In use Competitive programming problems collected after model cutoffs from LeetCode, AtCoder, Codeforces. Scored pass@1 on hidden tests. DeepSeek-V4-Pro 93.5%
  • DeepSWE In use 113 original long-horizon engineering tasks across 91 repos and five languages, written from scratch. Hand-written verifiers accept alternative solutions. GPT-6 Astra 74.1%
  • SciCode In use Scientist-curated research coding problems split into subproblems across natural sciences. Code checked against test cases. Seed2.1 Pro 59.8%
  • Codeforces rating In use Model solves recent Codeforces contest problems. An Elo-style rating is computed from simulated contest performance. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 3,471