Benchmark Almanac

Jigsaw Toxic Comment Classification

Nova 2 Omni Preview 57.8% leads since Dec 2025 Only in system cards

Models label Wikipedia talk page comments for toxicity types such as threats, insults and identity hate. Labs report F1 or ROC AUC.

The data comes from a 2017 Kaggle competition. Amazon uses it as a content moderation test for Nova 2 with F1.

Made by Jigsaw and Google (Conversation AI) , hosted on Kaggle Released Dec 2017 Refusing harmful requests All tasks public Last in a system card Dec 2025 Last model added Dec 2025
Level
Everyday Most adults, without training
Scored
Checked automatically A program checks the result against an answer key, unit tests or the expected final state.
Answers
Multiple choice
3
Models scored in lab cards
3
System cards report it, from 1 lab

Nova 2 Omni Preview leads with 57.8% among models released by Dec 2025

Best score per model as labs report them in their own cards. Labs pick their own settings, so these compare less cleanly than independent runs.

The newest model with a score here came out in Dec 2025, and nobody has reported a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:

  1. 1 Nova 2 Omni Preview 57.8%
  2. 2 Nova 2 Lite 56.5%
  3. 3 Nova 2.0 Pro Preview 54.7%
#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 Nova 2 Omni Preview 57.8% Dec 2025 Model card
2 Nova 2 Lite 56.5% Dec 2025 Model card
3 Nova 2.0 Pro Preview 54.7% Dec 2025 Model card

Number one over time

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.

Amazon
Lab claims Not tested since Dec 2025

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

Reported by the lab in its model card
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) Nova 2 Omni Preview 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) Nova 2 Omni Preview

Labs report it only in system cards

We read the headline results of 479 launch posts from 51 labs, and none of them list this benchmark. Some system cards do, below.

3 system cards report it, from 1 lab

Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.

DateDocumentScoreAs the document writes itSection
2 Dec 2025 Nova 2 Omni Preview technical report 57.8 Jigsaw F1-score, content moderation, non-reasoning mode (Table 14) Safety
2 Dec 2025 Nova 2 Lite technical report 56.5 Jigsaw F1-score, content moderation, non-reasoning mode (Table 14) Safety
2 Dec 2025 Nova 2.0 Pro Preview technical report 54.7 Jigsaw F1-score, content moderation, non-reasoning mode (Table 14) Safety

More in Safety and alignment

All 444 in Safety and alignment
  • FORTRESS In use Paired adversarial and benign national-security misuse prompts. Rubric-graded risk score on adversarial and over-refusal score on benign prompts. Claude Opus 5.5 5.78%
  • StrongREJECT In use Forbidden-prompt jailbreak benchmark with a rubric grader that scores how useful a non-refusal actually is. Inkling 98.6%
  • AgentDojo In use Agents do tool-use tasks while tools and data carry prompt injections. Attack success rate counts hijacked runs. Grok 4 Fast 0%
  • MASK In use Measures whether a model contradicts its own elicited beliefs under pressure to lie. Honesty separated from accuracy. Muse Spark Open 98.1%
  • Gray Swan IPI Arena benchmark In use Indirect prompt-injection attacks from public red-teaming competitions replayed on tool, coding and browser agents. Attack success rate at k attempts. GPT-6 Astra 8.50%
  • Agentic misalignment suite (Anthropic) In use Agents in simulated company settings face threats or goal conflicts that invite blackmail, leaking or sabotage. Score is the misaligned action rate. Claude Sonnet 4.5 0%