Benchmark Almanac

InsCtrl (Tencent)

Models write text under detailed instructions in a Tencent in-house text creation test. Task and scoring details are not published.

Seen in the Hunyuan-A13B-Instruct card. Scoring method is a guess from the task type.

Made by Tencent Hunyuan Released Jun 2025 Following precise instructions Tasks kept private Last in a launch post Jun 2025 , dropped before it saturated Last model added Jun 2025
Level
Everyday Most adults, without training
Scored
Graded by a model A language model scores each response, usually against a rubric.
Answers
Open-ended Free-form text, documents, designs or media judged as a whole.
1
Model scored in lab cards
1
Launch post lists it, from 1 lab
1
System card reports it, from 1 lab

Hunyuan-A13B-Instruct leads with 71.9%

Best score per model as labs report them in their own cards. Labs pick their own settings, so these compare less cleanly than independent runs.

  1. 1 Hunyuan-A13B-Instruct 71.9%
#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 Hunyuan-A13B-Instruct 71.9% Jun 2025 Model card

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

Reported by the lab in its model card
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2025 Near the ceiling (85%) Hunyuan-A13B-Instruct 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2025 Near the ceiling (85%) Hunyuan-A13B-Instruct

No launch post has listed it since Jun 2025

Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.

Tencent
DateLaunch postScoreAs the post writes it
27 Jun 2025 Hunyuan-A13B-Instruct 71.9 InsCtrl

One system card reports it

Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.

DateDocumentScoreAs the document writes itSection
26 Jun 2025 Hunyuan-A13B-Instruct technical report 71.9 InsCtrl, slow-thinking (Table 3). Fast-thinking 68.9 (Table 4) Capabilities

More in Instructions and chat

All 76 in Instructions and chat
  • IFEval In use Models answer about 500 prompts containing verifiable instructions such as word limits or required keywords. Code checks each instruction for strict and loose accuracy. Gemma 4 31B IT 98.9%
  • IFBench In use 58 new out-of-domain verifiable output constraints. Scored by programmatic constraint checks (strict or loose). Nemotron-Cascade 2 30B-A3B 82.9%
  • MultiChallenge In use Multi-turn conversations testing instruction retention, inference memory, versioned editing and self-coherence. Graded by LLM judge with rubrics. GPT-6.1 Sol 82%
  • Multi-IF In use Models follow verifiable instructions over three-turn conversations in eight languages, extending IFEval. Scored by instruction accuracy at each turn. LFM3-1.7B 89.1%
  • AdvancedIF In use Models respond to over 1,600 prompts with complex, multi-turn, and system-level instructions. A judge model checks each response against expert-written rubrics. MAI-Thinking-1 85%
  • IFStruct In use Models generate JSON or YAML that must follow a requested schema and phrasing constraints, without constrained decoding. A response passes only if every structural constraint holds. LFM3-1.7B 93.7%