Benchmark Almanac

Image input safety evaluations

GPT-4.5 99% Only in system cards

Models answer harmful prompts that combine text and images in categories such as hate, extremism and self-harm. Scored as safe completion rate.

In-house OpenAI evaluation. Cards report category scores with no overall number.

Made by OpenAI Released Dec 2024 Refusing harmful requests Tasks kept private Last in a system card Oct 2026 Last model added Oct 2026
Level
Everyday Most adults, without training
Scored
Graded by a model A language model scores each response, usually against a rubric.
Answers
Open-ended Free-form text, documents, designs or media judged as a whole.
2
Models scored in lab cards
31
System cards report it, from 1 lab

GPT-4.5 leads with 99%

Best score per model as labs report them in their own cards. Labs pick their own settings, so these compare less cleanly than independent runs.

  1. 1 GPT-4.5 99%
  2. 2 o1 96.1%
#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 GPT-4.5 99% Feb 2025 Model card
2 o1 96.1% Dec 2024 Model card

The best score passed 85% in Dec 2024

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

Reported by the lab in its model card Best so far
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2025 Near the ceiling (85%) GPT-4.5 o1 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2025 Near the ceiling (85%) GPT-4.5

Labs report it only in system cards

We read the headline results of 479 launch posts from 51 labs, and none of them list this benchmark. Some system cards do, below.

31 system cards report it, from 1 lab

Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.

DateDocumentScoreAs the document writes itSection
29 Oct 2026 GPT-6 Luna system card addendum Image input evaluations, safe completion, 4 categories, no overall score (Table 3) Safety
26 Oct 2026 GPT-6.1 Terra system card addendum Image input evaluations, safe completion, 4 categories, no overall score (second Table 24, 3.2) Safety
7 Oct 2026 GPT-6 Sol system card addendum Image input evaluations, safe completion, 4 categories, no overall score (Table 3) Safety
7 Oct 2026 GPT-6 Luna system card addendum Image input evaluations, safe completion, 4 categories, no overall score (Table 3) Safety
29 Sep 2026 GPT-6.1 Sol system card addendum Image input evaluations, safe completion, 4 categories, no overall score (Table 4) Safety
22 Sep 2026 GPT-6 Sol system card Image input evaluations, safe completion, 4 categories, no overall score (Table 26, A.2.2) Safety
22 Sep 2026 GPT-6 Luna system card Image input evaluations, safe completion, 4 categories, no overall score (Table 26, A.2.2) Safety
3 Sep 2026 GPT-6 Astra system card Image input evaluations, safe completion, 4 categories, no overall score (Table 4) Safety
6 Aug 2026 GPT-5.6 Sol system card addendum Image input evaluations, not_unsafe, 4 categories, no overall score (3.3) Safety
6 Aug 2026 GPT-5.6 Luna system card addendum Image input evaluations, not_unsafe, 4 categories, no overall score (3.3) Safety
9 Jul 2026 GPT-5.6 Terra system card Image input evaluations, not_unsafe, 4 categories, no overall score (3.2) Safety
9 Jul 2026 GPT-5.6 Sol system card Image input evaluations, not_unsafe, 4 categories, no overall score (3.2) Safety
9 Jul 2026 GPT-5.6 Luna system card Image input evaluations, not_unsafe, 4 categories, no overall score (3.2) Safety
25 Jun 2026 GPT-5.6 Terra system card Image input evaluations, not_unsafe, 4 categories, no overall score (3.2) Safety
25 Jun 2026 GPT-5.6 Sol system card Image input evaluations, not_unsafe, 4 categories, no overall score (3.2) Safety
25 Jun 2026 GPT-5.6 Luna system card Image input evaluations, not_unsafe, 4 categories, no overall score (3.2) Safety
4 May 2026 GPT-5.5 Instant system card Image input evaluations, not_unsafe, 4 categories, no overall score: hate 0.979, extremism 0.969, self-harm 0.982, harms-erotic 0.990 (Table 2) Safety
23 Apr 2026 GPT-5.5 system card Image input evaluations, not_unsafe, 4 categories, no overall score (Table 2) Safety
5 Mar 2026 GPT-5.4 system card Image input evaluations, not_unsafe, 6 categories, no overall score (Table 5) Safety
11 Dec 2025 GPT-5.2 system card addendum Image input evaluations, not_unsafe, gpt-5.2-thinking, 6 categories, no overall score (Table 4) Safety
18 Nov 2025 GPT-5.1-Codex-Max system card Image input evaluations, not_unsafe, 6 categories, no overall score (Table 3) Safety
12 Nov 2025 GPT-5.1 system card addendum Image input evaluations, not_unsafe, gpt-5.1-thinking, 6 categories, no overall score (Table 3) Safety
27 Oct 2025 GPT-5 system card addendum Image input evaluations, not_unsafe, 6 categories, no overall score (Table 3) Safety
7 Aug 2025 GPT-5 system card Image input evaluations, not_unsafe, 6 categories, no overall score (Table 10) Safety
7 Aug 2025 GPT-5 nano system card Image input, gpt-5-thinking-nano, 6 categories, no overall score (Table 26) Safety
7 Aug 2025 GPT-5 mini system card Image input, gpt-5-thinking-mini, 6 categories, no overall score (Table 26) Safety
17 Jul 2025 ChatGPT agent system card Image input evaluations, not_unsafe, 6 categories, no overall score (Table 5) Safety
16 Apr 2025 o4-mini system card Multimodal refusal evaluations, vision sexual and self-harm rows, not_unsafe, no overall score (Table 5) Safety
16 Apr 2025 o3 system card Multimodal refusal evaluations, vision sexual and self-harm rows, not_unsafe, no overall score (Table 5) Safety
27 Feb 2025 GPT-4.5 system card 99 Multimodal Refusal Evaluation, text and image input, not_unsafe, not_overrefuse 0.31 (Table 2) Safety
5 Dec 2024 o1 system card 96.1 Multimodal Refusal Evaluation - Text and Image Input, not_unsafe overall sample weighted (Table 22, not_overrefuse 0.96 in Table 2) Safety

More in Safety and alignment

All 444 in Safety and alignment
  • FORTRESS In use Paired adversarial and benign national-security misuse prompts. Rubric-graded risk score on adversarial and over-refusal score on benign prompts. Claude Opus 5.5 5.78%
  • StrongREJECT In use Forbidden-prompt jailbreak benchmark with a rubric grader that scores how useful a non-refusal actually is. Inkling 98.6%
  • AgentDojo In use Agents do tool-use tasks while tools and data carry prompt injections. Attack success rate counts hijacked runs. Grok 4 Fast 0%
  • MASK In use Measures whether a model contradicts its own elicited beliefs under pressure to lie. Honesty separated from accuracy. Muse Spark Open 98.1%
  • Gray Swan IPI Arena benchmark In use Indirect prompt-injection attacks from public red-teaming competitions replayed on tool, coding and browser agents. Attack success rate at k attempts. GPT-6 Astra 8.50%
  • Agentic misalignment suite (Anthropic) In use Agents in simulated company settings face threats or goal conflicts that invite blackmail, leaking or sabotage. Score is the misaligned action rate. Claude Sonnet 4.5 0%