Benchmark Almanac

HumanEvalPack

Cohere Command A 76.2% leads since Apr 2025 Only in system cards

Models write functions for HumanEval problems translated into Python, JavaScript, Java, Go, C++ and Rust. Hidden tests give pass@1.

The pack also has code repair and explanation tasks. Labs usually report the synthesize task.

Made by Hugging Face and BigCode (Muennighoff et al. , OctoPack) Released Aug 2023 Function-level problems All tasks public Last in a system card Apr 2025 Last model added Apr 2025
Level
University Undergraduates and entry-level professionals
Scored
Checked automatically A program checks the result against an answer key, unit tests or the expected final state.
Answers
Code A program or patch run against tests.
3
Models scored in lab cards
3
System cards report it, from 2 labs

Cohere Command A leads with 76.2% among models released by Mar 2025

Best score per model as labs report them in their own cards. Labs pick their own settings, so these compare less cleanly than independent runs.

The newest model with a score here came out in Mar 2025, and nobody has reported a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:

  1. 1 Cohere Command A 76.2%
  2. 2 Qwen-14B 33.7%
  3. 3 Qwen-7B 24.2%
#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 Cohere Command A 76.2% Apr 2025 Model card
2 Qwen-14B 33.7% Sep 2023 Model card
3 Qwen-7B 24.2% Sep 2023 Model card

2 models have held number one since its release in Aug 2023

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.

Qwen Cohere
Lab claims Not tested since Apr 2025

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

Reported by the lab in its model card Best so far
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2024 2025 Near the ceiling (85%) Cohere Command A Qwen-14B 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2024 2025 Near the ceiling (85%) Cohere Command A Qwen-14B

Labs report it only in system cards

We read the headline results of 479 launch posts from 51 labs, and none of them list this benchmark. Some system cards do, below.

3 system cards report it, from 2 labs

Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.

DateDocumentScoreAs the document writes itSection
1 Apr 2025 Cohere Command A technical report 76.2 HE (All), HumanEval in six languages (Table 12, Table 26) Capabilities
28 Sep 2023 Qwen-7B technical report 24.2 HumanEvalPack (synthesize) zero-shot pass@1 average: Python 37.2, JavaScript 23.2, Java 32.9, Go 20.7, C++ 22.0, Rust 9.1 (Table 11) Capabilities
28 Sep 2023 Qwen-14B technical report 33.7 HumanEvalPack (synthesize) zero-shot pass@1 average: Python 43.9, JavaScript 38.4, Java 42.7, Go 34.1, C++ 24.4, Rust 18.9 (Table 11) Capabilities

More in Coding

All 243 in Coding
  • SWE-bench Verified In use 500 human-validated GitHub issues from 12 Python repos. Agent writes a patch that must pass hidden tests. Claude Opus 4.7 83.5%
  • SWE-bench Multilingual In use 300 GitHub-issue tasks across nine programming languages in SWE-bench format. Patch graded by repository tests. Claude Opus 5.5 93.9%
  • LiveCodeBench v6 In use Competitive programming problems collected after model cutoffs from LeetCode, AtCoder, Codeforces. Scored pass@1 on hidden tests. DeepSeek-V4-Pro 93.5%
  • DeepSWE In use 113 original long-horizon engineering tasks across 91 repos and five languages, written from scratch. Hand-written verifiers accept alternative solutions. GPT-6 Astra 74.1%
  • SciCode In use Scientist-curated research coding problems split into subproblems across natural sciences. Code checked against test cases. Seed2.1 Pro 59.8%
  • Codeforces rating In use Model solves recent Codeforces contest problems. An Elo-style rating is computed from simulated contest performance. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 3,471