Hermes Bench
Agents in Hermes Agent do 150 tasks across 25 categories, such as research, diagrams, memory, tool use and safety. Graders check the files and state left behind.
Launched 2026-10-06 as part of the Hermes Index. 24 tasks are multi-turn.
- Level
- Expert Specialists with years of training, often over hours of work
- Scored
- Checked automatically A program checks the result against an answer key, unit tests or the expected final state.
- Answers
- Agent task Many steps in a terminal, browser, desktop, app, game or robot.
Claude Opus 5.5 leads with 76.7%
Best score per entry from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on 2 Nov 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Every run is in the next chart. Names in gray aren't in our model list: fine-tunes, agent systems, products and older models. They don't count toward leaders.
- 76.7 Claude Opus 5.5
- 74.4 Grok 4.7
- 73.9 GPT-6.1 Sol
- 73.7 GPT-6 Astra
- 73.5 GPT-6 Sol
- 73.5 Claude Sonnet 5.5
- 71.8 GLM-5.3
- 71.5 Kimi K3
- 71.0 Claude Haiku 5.5
- 70.7
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
- 70.5
Qwen 3.8 Max
- 70.5 GPT-6 Luna
- 69.2
Step 5 Preview
- 68.9 GLM-5.3-Flash
- 63.4 Nemotron Super 3.5
- 62.2
Gemini 3.8 Flash
- 58.6
Tencent Hy4 preview
- 53.8
Ling-3.0-flash
- 1 Claude Opus 5.5 76.7%
- 2 Grok 4.7 74.4%
- 3 GPT-6.1 Sol 73.9%
- 4 GPT-6 Astra 73.7%
- 5 GPT-6 Sol 73.5%
- 6 Claude Sonnet 5.5 73.5%
- 7 GLM-5.3 71.8%
- 8 Kimi K3 71.5%
- 9 Claude Haiku 5.5 71%
- 10
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 70.7%
- 11
Qwen 3.8 Max 70.5%
- 12 GPT-6 Luna 70.5%
- 13
Step 5 Preview 69.2%
- 14 GLM-5.3-Flash 68.9%
- 15 Nemotron Super 3.5 63.4%
- 16
Gemini 3.8 Flash 62.2%
- 17
Tencent Hy4 preview 58.6%
- 18
Ling-3.0-flash 53.8%
| # | Entry | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Claude Opus 5.5 | 76.7% | Hermes Agent | Sep 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 2 | Grok 4.7 | 74.4% | Hermes Agent | Sep 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 3 | GPT-6.1 Sol | 73.9% | Hermes Agent | Sep 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 4 | GPT-6 Astra | 73.7% | Hermes Agent | Sep 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 5 | GPT-6 Sol | 73.5% | Hermes Agent | Sep 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 6 | Claude Sonnet 5.5 | 73.5% | Hermes Agent | Sep 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 7 | GLM-5.3 | 71.8% | Hermes Agent | Aug 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 8 | Kimi K3 | 71.5% | Hermes Agent | Jul 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 9 | Claude Haiku 5.5 | 71% | Hermes Agent | Oct 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 10 | | 70.7% | Hermes Agent | Sep 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 11 | | 70.5% | Hermes Agent | Aug 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 12 | GPT-6 Luna | 70.5% | Hermes Agent | Sep 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 13 | | 69.2% | Hermes Agent | Sep 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 14 | GLM-5.3-Flash | 68.9% | Hermes Agent | Aug 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 15 | Nemotron Super 3.5 | 63.4% | Hermes Agent | Official leaderboard | |
| 16 | | 62.2% | Hermes Agent | Sep 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 17 | | 58.6% | Hermes Agent | Aug 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 18 | | 53.8% | Hermes Agent | Aug 2026 | Official leaderboard |
The best score, 76.7%, costs $0.52 a task
Runs on the cost frontier score higher than any run that's cheaper. GLM-5.3 comes within 4.9 points of the best for $0.18 a task, 3 times cheaper. The costs are the leaderboard's own estimates, so compare them only within this benchmark.
| Model | Effort | Harness | Score | Cost per task | Output tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Opus 5.5 | Hermes Agent | 76.7% | $0.52 | ||
| Grok 4.7 | Hermes Agent | 74.4% | $0.69 | ||
| GPT-6.1 Sol | Hermes Agent | 73.9% | $0.26 | ||
| GPT-6 Astra | Hermes Agent | 73.7% | $1.52 | ||
| GPT-6 Sol | Hermes Agent | 73.5% | $0.26 | ||
| Claude Sonnet 5.5 | Hermes Agent | 73.5% | $0.25 | ||
| GLM-5.3 | Hermes Agent | 71.8% | $0.18 | ||
| Kimi K3 | Hermes Agent | 71.5% | $0.18 | ||
| Claude Haiku 5.5 | Hermes Agent | 71% | $0.01 | ||
| | Hermes Agent | 70.7% | $0.02 | ||
| | Hermes Agent | 70.5% | $0.32 | ||
| GPT-6 Luna | Hermes Agent | 70.5% | $0.01 | ||
| | Hermes Agent | 69.2% | $0.17 | ||
| GLM-5.3-Flash | Hermes Agent | 68.9% | $0.02 | ||
| | Hermes Agent | 62.2% | $0.64 | ||
| | Hermes Agent | 58.6% | $0.09 | ||
| | Hermes Agent | 53.8% | $0.004 |
Number one over time
Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.
Scores over time
All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.
No lab model card reports it yet
We read the headline results of 479 launch posts from 51 labs, and none of them list this benchmark.
More in Tool use
- AutomationBench In use Agent completes end-to-end business workflows inside a simulated company exposing dozens of REST APIs. Graded on resulting state.
Gemini 4 Carbon 53.9%
- MCP Atlas In use Multi-step workflows over real MCP servers. Scores tool-use competency on realistic tasks.
Muse Spark 1.1 88.1%
- BFCL V4 In use Models call functions and tools, including multi-turn agentic tasks with web search and memory. Checked against expected calls and outcomes.
Qwen3.7-Max 75%
- τ³-bench Banking In use Agents act as banking customer-service reps over many turns with a simulated user, following policy. Pass^1 on the final database state.
Qwen 3.8 Max 55.1%
- Claw-Eval In use 300 human-verified agent tasks (service orchestration, multimodal, multi-turn dialogue) audited via traces and snapshots. Rubric scores with Pass^3 consistency. Claude Sonnet 4.6 81.4%
- DeepSearchQA In use Questions that need multi-step search and synthesis. Final answers graded against references. Kimi K3 95%