Benchmark Almanac

HaltEval-prelim (Meta)

Code World Model (CWM) 94% Only in system cards

Models judge whether 230 Python programs translated from SV-COMP and TPDB terminate. A divergence claim must give an input that times out after 5 seconds.

In-house Meta evaluation. The tasks are not public. A constant classifier scores 50 on the balanced set.

Made by Meta FAIR Released Sep 2025 Function-level problems Tasks kept private Last in a system card Sep 2025 Last model added Sep 2025
Level
Expert Specialists with years of training, often over hours of work
Scored
Checked automatically A program checks the result against an answer key, unit tests or the expected final state.
Answers
Short answer A number, word or short string matched to a key.
1
Model scored in lab cards
1
System card reports it, from 1 lab

Code World Model (CWM) leads with 94%

Best score per model as labs report them in their own cards. Labs pick their own settings, so these compare less cleanly than independent runs.

  1. 1 Code World Model (CWM) 94%
#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 Code World Model (CWM) 94% Sep 2025 Model card

The best score passed 85% in Sep 2025

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

Reported by the lab in its model card
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Near the ceiling (85%) Code World Model (CWM) 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Near the ceiling (85%) Code World Model (CWM)

Labs report it only in system cards

We read the headline results of 479 launch posts from 51 labs, and none of them list this benchmark. Some system cards do, below.

One system card reports it

Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.

DateDocumentScoreAs the document writes itSection
30 Sep 2025 Code World Model (CWM) technical report 94 HaltEval-prelim pass@1 with reasoning, printed 0.94, direct 0.37, CoT 0.55 (Table 10) Capabilities

More in Coding

All 243 in Coding
  • SWE-bench Verified In use 500 human-validated GitHub issues from 12 Python repos. Agent writes a patch that must pass hidden tests. Claude Opus 4.7 83.5%
  • SWE-bench Multilingual In use 300 GitHub-issue tasks across nine programming languages in SWE-bench format. Patch graded by repository tests. Claude Opus 5.5 93.9%
  • LiveCodeBench v6 In use Competitive programming problems collected after model cutoffs from LeetCode, AtCoder, Codeforces. Scored pass@1 on hidden tests. DeepSeek-V4-Pro 93.5%
  • DeepSWE In use 113 original long-horizon engineering tasks across 91 repos and five languages, written from scratch. Hand-written verifiers accept alternative solutions. GPT-6 Astra 74.1%
  • SciCode In use Scientist-curated research coding problems split into subproblems across natural sciences. Code checked against test cases. Seed2.1 Pro 59.8%
  • Codeforces rating In use Model solves recent Codeforces contest problems. An Elo-style rating is computed from simulated contest performance. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 3,471