GSM1k
Models solve new grade school math word problems written to mirror GSM8K in style and difficulty. The gap between GSM8K and GSM1k accuracy shows overfitting or contamination.
Scale's SEAL Math board used 1,000 problems with 50 public, and Scale marked it deprecated in 2025-01. The Hugging Face dataset posted on 2025-03-31 has 1,205 rows. Some model families dropped up to 8 points against GSM8K.
In the authors’ words
Large language models (LLMs) have achieved impressive success on many benchmarks for mathematical reasoning. However, there is growing concern that some of this performance actually reflects dataset contamination, where data closely resembling benchmark questions leaks into the training data, instead of true reasoning ability. To investigate this claim rigorously, we commission Grade School Math 1000 (GSM1k). GSM1k is designed to mirror the style and complexity of the established GSM8k benchmark, the gold standard for measuring elementary mathematical reasoning. We ensure that the two benchmarks are comparable across important metrics such as human solve rates, number of steps in solution, answer magnitude, and more. When evaluating leading open- and closed-source LLMs on GSM1k, we observe accuracy drops of up to 8%, with several families of models showing evidence of systematic overfitting across almost all model sizes. Further analysis suggests a positive relationship (Spearman's r^2 = 0.36) between a model's probability of generating an example from GSM8k and its performance gap between GSM8k and GSM1k, suggesting that some models may have partially memorized GSM8k. Nevertheless, many models, especially those on the frontier, show minimal signs of overfitting, and all models broadly demonstrate generalization to novel math problems guaranteed to not be in their training data.
- Level
- School Students, from grade school to high school
- Scored
- Checked automatically A program checks the result against an answer key, unit tests or the expected final state.
- Answers
- Short answer A number, word or short string matched to a key.
Claude 3.5 Sonnet leads with 96.6% among models released by Aug 2024
Best score per entry from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on 2 Nov 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Names in gray aren't in our model list: fine-tunes, agent systems, products and older models. They don't count toward leaders.
The newest model with a score here came out in Aug 2024, and nobody has tested a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:
- GPT-6 Astra
- Claude Opus 5.5
- GPT-6.1 Terra
- GPT-6.1 Sol
- and 16 more
- 96.6 Claude 3.5 Sonnet
- 95.7 GPT-4o
- 95.6
Llama 3.1-405B
- 95.2 Claude 3 Opus
- 95.1 GPT-4 Turbo
- 94.8 GPT-4o
- 94.7 Gemini 1.5 Pro (August 2024)
- 93.9
Mistral Large 2
- 93.3 Claude 3 Sonnet
- 92.3
Gemini 1.5 Pro
- 90.5
Gemini 1.5 Pro
- 90.1
Llama 3-70B
- 90.1
Gemini 1.5 Flash
- 87.5
Mistral Large
- 79.8
Gemini 1.0 Pro
- 37.5
Code Llama 34B Instruct
- 1 Claude 3.5 Sonnet 96.6%
- 2 GPT-4o Aug 2024 95.7%
- 3
Llama 3.1-405B 95.6%
- 4 Claude 3 Opus 95.2%
- 5 GPT-4 Turbo Apr 2024 95.1%
- 6 GPT-4o May 2024 94.8%
- 7 Gemini 1.5 Pro (August 2024) 94.7%
- 8
Mistral Large 2 Jul 2024 93.9%
- 9 Claude 3 Sonnet 93.3%
- 10
Gemini 1.5 Pro May 2024 92.3%
- 11
Gemini 1.5 Pro Feb 2024 90.5%
- 12
Llama 3-70B 90.1%
- 13
Gemini 1.5 Flash May 2024 90.1%
- 14
Mistral Large 87.5%
- 15
Gemini 1.0 Pro 79.8%
- 16
Code Llama 34B Instruct 37.5%
| # | Entry | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Claude 3.5 Sonnet | 96.6% | Jun 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 2 | GPT-4o Aug 2024 | 95.7% | Aug 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 3 | | 95.6% | Jul 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 4 | Claude 3 Opus | 95.2% | Feb 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 5 | GPT-4 Turbo Apr 2024 | 95.1% | Apr 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 6 | GPT-4o May 2024 | 94.8% | May 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 7 | Gemini 1.5 Pro (August 2024) | 94.7% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 8 | | 93.9% | Jul 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 9 | Claude 3 Sonnet | 93.3% | Feb 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 10 | | 92.3% | May 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 11 | | 90.5% | Feb 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 12 | | 90.1% | Apr 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 13 | | 90.1% | May 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 14 | | 87.5% | Feb 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 15 | | 79.8% | Dec 2023 | Official leaderboard | |
| 16 | | 37.5% | Aug 2023 | Official leaderboard |
2 models have held number one since its release in May 2024
Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.
The best score passed 85% in Feb 2024
All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.
No lab model card reports it yet
We read the headline results of 479 launch posts from 51 labs, and none of them list this benchmark.
More in Math
- IMO-AnswerBench In use 400 olympiad problems with short verifiable answers, robustified against memorization. Scored by answer match. GLM-5.2 91%
- AIME 2026 In use Models solve the 30 integer-answer problems from the 2026 AIME I and II math competitions. Scored by exact answer match. GPT-5.5 100%
- HMMT 2026 In use Models solve the 33 final-answer problems from the February 2026 Harvard-MIT Mathematics Tournament. Scored by exact answer match. GPT-5.5 98.5%
- MathArena (Apex, IMO, USAMO) In use Evaluates models on newly released math competitions after release. Final-answer or human/LLM-judged proof scores. Claude Opus 4.8 81.3%
- PolyMath In use Models solve 9,000 parallel math problems in 18 languages across four difficulty levels, from school math to frontier math. Final answers are checked.
Qwen3.7-Max 86.5%
- USAMO 2026 In use Models write full proofs for the six problems of the 2026 USA Mathematical Olympiad. Judges grade each proof from 0 to 7 against rubrics. GPT-5.5 98.2%