Benchmark Almanac

GameDevBench

Claude Opus 5.5 70.6% leads since Sep 2026 Not in model cards

Agents complete game development tasks in the Godot engine, derived from web and video tutorials, across 2D and 3D graphics, user interfaces and gameplay logic. Tests in the engine check each result.

ICML 2026. The task count grew from 132 in the first paper version to 333, so early scores may not compare. Claude Opus 5.5 xhigh led at 70.6% on the README board. Repo has 151 stars.

In the authors’ words

Despite rapid progress on coding agents, progress on their multimodal counterparts has lagged behind. A key challenge is the scarcity of evaluation testbeds that combine the complexity of software development with the need for deep multimodal understanding. In game development, agents must navigate large, dense codebases while manipulating intrinsically multimodal assets such as shaders, sprites, and animations within a visual game scene. We present GameDevBench, the first benchmark for evaluating agents on game development tasks. GameDevBench consists of 333 tasks derived from web and video tutorials. Tasks require significant multimodal understanding and are complex: the average solution requires over three times the lines of code and file changes compared to prior software development benchmarks. Agents struggle with game development, with the best agent and method solving only 53.8% of tasks. We find a strong correlation between perceived task difficulty and multimodal complexity, with average success rate dropping from 51.4% on gameplay-oriented tasks to 33.0% on 2D graphics tasks. To improve multimodal capability, we introduce two simple image- and video-based feedback mechanisms for agents. Despite their simplicity, these methods consistently improve performance, increasing GPT-5.4's performance from 41.1% to 52.0% when given visual feedback.

Abstract of GameDevBench: Evaluating Agentic Capabilities Through Game Development (arXiv:2602.11103, CC0)
Made by Carnegie Mellon University Released Feb 2026 Building whole projects All tasks public Last model added Sep 2026 Scores refreshed 2 Nov 2026
Level
University Undergraduates and entry-level professionals
Scored
Checked automatically A program checks the result against an answer key, unit tests or the expected final state.
Answers
Agent task Many steps in a terminal, browser, desktop, app, game or robot.
10
Models scored on its own leaderboard

Claude Opus 5.5 leads with 70.6%

Best score per model from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on 2 Nov 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best.

  1. 1 Claude Opus 5.5 xhigh 70.6%
  2. 2 GPT-6.1 Sol xhigh 70%
  3. 3 GPT-6 Astra high 68.8%
  4. 4 Claude Fable 5 xhigh 67.3%
  5. 5 GPT-5.6 Sol xhigh 63.7%
  6. 6 Muse Spark 1.2 high 61%
  7. 7 Kimi K3 58%
  8. 8 Claude Opus 4.8 55.9%
  9. 9 GPT-5.5 54.7%
  10. 10 GLM-5.2 38.4%
#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 Claude Opus 5.5 70.6% xhigh, Claude Code Sep 2026 Official leaderboard
2 GPT-6.1 Sol 70% xhigh, Codex Sep 2026 Official leaderboard
3 GPT-6 Astra 68.8% high, Codex Sep 2026 Official leaderboard
4 Claude Fable 5 67.3% xhigh, Claude Code Jun 2026 Official leaderboard
5 GPT-5.6 Sol 63.7% xhigh, Codex Jul 2026 Official leaderboard
6 Muse Spark 1.2 61% high, Muse Code Aug 2026 Official leaderboard
7 Kimi K3 58% Kimi Code Jul 2026 Official leaderboard
8 Claude Opus 4.8 55.9% Claude Code May 2026 Official leaderboard
9 GPT-5.5 54.7% Codex Apr 2026 Official leaderboard
10 GLM-5.2 38.4% OpenCode Jun 2026 Official leaderboard

5 models have held number one since its release in Feb 2026

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.

OpenAI Anthropic
Own leaderboard 5 leaders

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

On the benchmark’s own leaderboard Best so far
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) Claude Opus 5.5 Claude Fable 5 Claude Opus 4.8 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) Claude Opus 5.5 Claude Opus 4.8

No lab model card reports it yet

We read the headline results of 479 launch posts from 51 labs, and none of them list this benchmark.

More in Coding

All 243 in Coding
  • SWE-bench Verified In use 500 human-validated GitHub issues from 12 Python repos. Agent writes a patch that must pass hidden tests. Claude Opus 4.7 83.5%
  • SWE-bench Multilingual In use 300 GitHub-issue tasks across nine programming languages in SWE-bench format. Patch graded by repository tests. Claude Opus 5.5 93.9%
  • LiveCodeBench v6 In use Competitive programming problems collected after model cutoffs from LeetCode, AtCoder, Codeforces. Scored pass@1 on hidden tests. DeepSeek-V4-Pro 93.5%
  • DeepSWE In use 113 original long-horizon engineering tasks across 91 repos and five languages, written from scratch. Hand-written verifiers accept alternative solutions. GPT-6 Astra 74.1%
  • SciCode In use Scientist-curated research coding problems split into subproblems across natural sciences. Code checked against test cases. Seed2.1 Pro 59.8%
  • Codeforces rating In use Model solves recent Codeforces contest problems. An Elo-style rating is computed from simulated contest performance. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 3,471