Benchmark Almanac

FLTEval

Leanstral 1.5 43.2 Fading

Agents complete the formal Lean proofs and define the new mathematical concepts in real pull requests to the Fermat's Last Theorem (FLT) formalization project. Lean and SafeVerify check each submitted diff.

Mistral introduced it with Leanstral in 2026-03 and open-sourced the harness with Leanstral 1.5 in 2026-07. The harness is shaped like SWE-bench and the repo ships a 162-instance sample.

Made by Mistral AI Released Mar 2026 Formal proofs All tasks public Last in a launch post Jul 2026 , dropped before it saturated Last model added Jul 2026
Level
Research frontier Researchers, on open problems or tasks that take days
Scored
Checked automatically A program checks the result against an answer key, unit tests or the expected final state.
Answers
Agent task Many steps in a terminal, browser, desktop, app, game or robot.
2
Models scored in lab cards
2
Launch posts list it, from 1 lab
2
System cards report it, from 1 lab

Leanstral 1.5 leads with 43.2

Best score per model as labs report them in their own cards. Labs pick their own settings, so these compare less cleanly than independent runs.

  1. 1 Leanstral 1.5 43.2
  2. 2 Leanstral 31.9
#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 Leanstral 1.5 43.2 Jul 2026 Model card
2 Leanstral 31.9 Mar 2026 Model card

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

Reported by the lab in its model card
30.0 35.0 40.0 45.0 2026 30.0 35.0 40.0 45.0 2026

Labs headline it less often now, last in Jul 2026

Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.

Mistral AI
DateLaunch postScoreAs the post writes it
2 Jul 2026 Leanstral 1.5 43.2 FLTEval pass@8 43.2 (pass@1 28.9)
16 Mar 2026 Leanstral 31.9 FLTEval score, Leanstral pass@16 (pass@1 21.9)

2 system cards report it, from 1 lab

Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.

DateDocumentScoreAs the document writes itSection
2 Jul 2026 Leanstral technical report 31.9 FLTEval Leanstral 1.0 pass@16, cost $290. pass@8 31.0, pass@4 29.3, pass@2 26.3, pass@1 21.9 (Table 3) Capabilities
2 Jul 2026 Leanstral 1.5 technical report 43.2 FLTEval pass@8, cost $216. pass@4 38.9, pass@2 34.6, pass@1 28.9 (Table 3) Capabilities

More in Math

All 105 in Math
  • IMO-AnswerBench In use 400 olympiad problems with short verifiable answers, robustified against memorization. Scored by answer match. GLM-5.2 91%
  • AIME 2026 In use Models solve the 30 integer-answer problems from the 2026 AIME I and II math competitions. Scored by exact answer match. GPT-5.5 100%
  • HMMT 2026 In use Models solve the 33 final-answer problems from the February 2026 Harvard-MIT Mathematics Tournament. Scored by exact answer match. GPT-5.5 98.5%
  • MathArena (Apex, IMO, USAMO) In use Evaluates models on newly released math competitions after release. Final-answer or human/LLM-judged proof scores. Claude Opus 4.8 81.3%
  • PolyMath In use Models solve 9,000 parallel math problems in 18 languages across four difficulty levels, from school math to frontier math. Final answers are checked. Qwen3.7-Max 86.5%
  • USAMO 2026 In use Models write full proofs for the six problems of the 2026 USA Mathematical Olympiad. Judges grade each proof from 0 to 7 against rubrics. GPT-5.5 98.2%