Epoch Capabilities Index
Not in model cards
An index that fits model capability and benchmark difficulty from scores on over 50 benchmarks in Epoch AI's hub, using item response theory. Scores read like Elo ratings.
Each model needs at least four benchmark scores. Epoch also offers math, software engineering and cyber presets. The November 2026 export lists 271 models.
- Level
- Research frontier Researchers, on open problems or tasks that take days
- Scored
- Checked automatically A program checks the result against an answer key, unit tests or the expected final state.
- Answers
- Short answer A number, word or short string matched to a key.
No scores here yet
We have no scores for Epoch Capabilities Index yet.
No lab model card reports it yet
We read the headline results of 479 launch posts from 51 labs, and none of them list this benchmark.
More in Other
- Personal Superintelligence Index (Meta) In use Meta's composite of seven personal and knowledge-work evals: Agents' Last Exam, AutomationBench-AA, FocusBench, JobBench, GDP.pdf, VBT and DRACO.
- Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v5 In use Version 5 of Artificial Analysis's index: nine evaluations in four equal categories, most with private test sets, run three times each in its own agent harness.
Gemini 4 Carbon 59.0 - Anthropic ECI (AECI) Only in system cards Index that combines a basket of capability benchmarks into one capability score to track trends across Anthropic models. Claude Opus 5.5 169.4
- Qwen in-house English automatic evaluation Only in system cards Models answer Qwen in-house English datasets on knowledge, comprehension, coding, math and related skills. Skills and weights change between reports.
Qwen2-72B 72.9% - Recognition of model-written user turns (Anthropic) Only in system cards Models write synthetic user turns for real Claude Code transcripts, then judge which version is real. Score is accuracy above chance. Claude Mythos Preview 0.35
- LiveBench Dropped Models answer monthly refreshed questions across math, coding, reasoning, language, instruction following, and data analysis. Scored automatically against objective ground truth. Claude Fable 5.1 85.7%