DeepPlanning
Agents use tools to plan multi-day trips and multi-item shopping orders under time and budget limits. Plans are checked against verifiable constraints.
Qwen revised some shopping tasks and corrected some answer labels after the first release.
In the authors’ words
While agent evaluation has shifted toward long-horizon tasks, most benchmarks still emphasize local, step-level reasoning rather than the global constrained optimization (e.g., time and financial budgets) that demands genuine planning ability. Meanwhile, existing LLM planning benchmarks underrepresent the active information gathering and fine-grained local constraints typical of real-world settings. To address this, we introduce DeepPlanning, a challenging benchmark for practical long-horizon agent planning. It features multi-day travel planning and multi-product shopping tasks that require proactive information acquisition, local constrained reasoning, and global constrained optimization. Evaluations on DeepPlanning show that even frontier agentic LLMs struggle with these problems, highlighting the importance of reliable explicit reasoning patterns and parallel tool use for achieving better effectiveness-efficiency trade-offs. Error analysis further points to promising directions for improving agentic LLMs over long planning horizons. We open-source the code and data to support future research.
- Level
- Everyday Most adults, without training
- Scored
- Checked automatically A program checks the result against an answer key, unit tests or the expected final state.
- Answers
- Agent task Many steps in a terminal, browser, desktop, app, game or robot.
Qwen3.7-Plus leads with 62.3% among models released by Jun 2026
Best score per model as labs report them in their own cards. Labs pick their own settings, so these compare less cleanly than independent runs.
The newest model with a score here came out in Jun 2026, and nobody has reported a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:
- GPT-6 Astra
- Claude Opus 5.5
- GPT-6.1 Terra
- GPT-6.1 Sol
- and 16 more
- 1
Qwen3.7-Plus 62.3%
- 2
Qwen 3.6 Plus 41.5%
- 3
Qwen3.5 397B-A17B 34.3%
- 4
Qwen3-Max 28.7%
- 5
Qwen 3.6 35B-A3B 25.9%
- 6
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B 24.1%
| # | Model | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | | 62.3% | Jun 2026 | Model card | |
| 2 | | 41.5% | Apr 2026 | Model card | |
| 3 | | 34.3% | Feb 2026 | Model card | |
| 4 | | 28.7% | Jan 2026 | Model card | |
| 5 | | 25.9% | Apr 2026 | Model card | |
| 6 | | 24.1% | Feb 2026 | Model card |
4 models have held number one since its release in Jan 2026
Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.
Scores over time
All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.
Labs headline it less often now, last in Jun 2026
Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.
| Date | Launch post | Score | As the post writes it |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 Jun 2026 | 62.3 | Deep-Planning | |
| 15 Apr 2026 | 25.9 | DeepPlanning | |
| 2 Apr 2026 | 41.5 | DeepPlanning | |
| 24 Feb 2026 | 24.1 | DeepPlanning | |
| 16 Feb 2026 | 34.3 | DeepPlanning | |
| 23 Jan 2026 | 28.7 | Deep Planning |
More in Tool use
- AutomationBench In use Agent completes end-to-end business workflows inside a simulated company exposing dozens of REST APIs. Graded on resulting state.
Gemini 4 Carbon 53.9%
- MCP Atlas In use Multi-step workflows over real MCP servers. Scores tool-use competency on realistic tasks.
Muse Spark 1.1 88.1%
- BFCL V4 In use Models call functions and tools, including multi-turn agentic tasks with web search and memory. Checked against expected calls and outcomes.
Qwen3.7-Max 75%
- τ³-bench Banking In use Agents act as banking customer-service reps over many turns with a simulated user, following policy. Pass^1 on the final database state.
Qwen 3.8 Max 55.1%
- Claw-Eval In use 300 human-verified agent tasks (service orchestration, multimodal, multi-turn dialogue) audited via traces and snapshots. Rubric scores with Pass^3 consistency. Claude Sonnet 4.6 81.4%
- DeepSearchQA In use Questions that need multi-step search and synthesis. Final answers graded against references. Kimi K3 95%