Benchmark Almanac

DeepPlanning

Qwen3.7-Plus 62.3% leads since Jun 2026 Fading

Agents use tools to plan multi-day trips and multi-item shopping orders under time and budget limits. Plans are checked against verifiable constraints.

Qwen revised some shopping tasks and corrected some answer labels after the first release.

In the authors’ words

While agent evaluation has shifted toward long-horizon tasks, most benchmarks still emphasize local, step-level reasoning rather than the global constrained optimization (e.g., time and financial budgets) that demands genuine planning ability. Meanwhile, existing LLM planning benchmarks underrepresent the active information gathering and fine-grained local constraints typical of real-world settings. To address this, we introduce DeepPlanning, a challenging benchmark for practical long-horizon agent planning. It features multi-day travel planning and multi-product shopping tasks that require proactive information acquisition, local constrained reasoning, and global constrained optimization. Evaluations on DeepPlanning show that even frontier agentic LLMs struggle with these problems, highlighting the importance of reliable explicit reasoning patterns and parallel tool use for achieving better effectiveness-efficiency trade-offs. Error analysis further points to promising directions for improving agentic LLMs over long planning horizons. We open-source the code and data to support future research.

Abstract of DeepPlanning: Benchmarking Long-Horizon Agentic Planning with Verifiable Constraints (arXiv:2601.18137, CC0)
Made by Qwen Team , Alibaba Group Released Jan 2026 General assistants All tasks public Last in a launch post Jun 2026 , dropped before it saturated Last model added Jun 2026
Level
Everyday Most adults, without training
Scored
Checked automatically A program checks the result against an answer key, unit tests or the expected final state.
Answers
Agent task Many steps in a terminal, browser, desktop, app, game or robot.
6
Models scored in lab cards
6
Launch posts list it, from 1 lab

Qwen3.7-Plus leads with 62.3% among models released by Jun 2026

Best score per model as labs report them in their own cards. Labs pick their own settings, so these compare less cleanly than independent runs.

The newest model with a score here came out in Jun 2026, and nobody has reported a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:

  1. 1 Qwen3.7-Plus 62.3%
  2. 2 Qwen 3.6 Plus 41.5%
  3. 3 Qwen3.5 397B-A17B 34.3%
  4. 4 Qwen3-Max 28.7%
  5. 5 Qwen 3.6 35B-A3B 25.9%
  6. 6 Qwen3.5-122B-A10B 24.1%
#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 Qwen3.7-Plus 62.3% Jun 2026 Model card
2 Qwen 3.6 Plus 41.5% Apr 2026 Model card
3 Qwen3.5 397B-A17B 34.3% Feb 2026 Model card
4 Qwen3-Max 28.7% Jan 2026 Model card
5 Qwen 3.6 35B-A3B 25.9% Apr 2026 Model card
6 Qwen3.5-122B-A10B 24.1% Feb 2026 Model card

4 models have held number one since its release in Jan 2026

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.

Qwen
Lab claims Not tested since Jun 2026
Qwen3.7-Plus 62.3%

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

Reported by the lab in its model card Best so far
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) Qwen3.7-Plus Qwen 3.6 Plus Qwen3.5 397B-A17B Qwen3-Max 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) Qwen3.7-Plus Qwen 3.6 Plus

Labs headline it less often now, last in Jun 2026

Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.

Qwen
DateLaunch postScoreAs the post writes it
1 Jun 2026 Qwen3.7-Plus 62.3 Deep-Planning
15 Apr 2026 Qwen 3.6 35B-A3B 25.9 DeepPlanning
2 Apr 2026 Qwen 3.6 Plus 41.5 DeepPlanning
24 Feb 2026 Qwen3.5-122B-A10B 24.1 DeepPlanning
16 Feb 2026 Qwen3.5 397B-A17B 34.3 DeepPlanning
23 Jan 2026 Qwen3-Max 28.7 Deep Planning

More in Tool use

All 125 in Tool use
  • AutomationBench In use Agent completes end-to-end business workflows inside a simulated company exposing dozens of REST APIs. Graded on resulting state. Gemini 4 Carbon 53.9%
  • MCP Atlas In use Multi-step workflows over real MCP servers. Scores tool-use competency on realistic tasks. Muse Spark 1.1 88.1%
  • BFCL V4 In use Models call functions and tools, including multi-turn agentic tasks with web search and memory. Checked against expected calls and outcomes. Qwen3.7-Max 75%
  • τ³-bench Banking In use Agents act as banking customer-service reps over many turns with a simulated user, following policy. Pass^1 on the final database state. Qwen 3.8 Max 55.1%
  • Claw-Eval In use 300 human-verified agent tasks (service orchestration, multimodal, multi-turn dialogue) audited via traces and snapshots. Rubric scores with Pass^3 consistency. Claude Sonnet 4.6 81.4%
  • DeepSearchQA In use Questions that need multi-step search and synthesis. Final answers graded against references. Kimi K3 95%