DeepConsult
Seed2.0 Pro 61.1% leads since Feb 2026 Fading Deep research agents answer business and consulting queries. A model judge compares each report pairwise with an OpenAI Deep Research baseline answer.
The release date is inferred from the response file dated 2025-05-15 in the repo.
- Level
- Expert Specialists with years of training, often over hours of work
- Scored
- Graded by a model A language model scores each response, usually against a rubric.
- Answers
- Open-ended Free-form text, documents, designs or media judged as a whole.
Seed2.0 Pro leads with 61.1%
Best score per model as labs report them in their own cards. Labs pick their own settings, so these compare less cleanly than independent runs.
- 1 Seed2.0 Pro 61.1%
- 2 Seed1.8 41%
| # | Model | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Seed2.0 Pro | 61.1% | Feb 2026 | Model card | |
| 2 | Seed1.8 | 41% | Dec 2025 | Model card |
2 models have held number one since its release in May 2025
Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.
Scores over time
All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.
Labs headline it less often now, last in Feb 2026
Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.
| Date | Launch post | Score | As the post writes it |
|---|---|---|---|
| 14 Feb 2026 | Seed2.0 Pro | 61.1 | DeepConsult |
| 18 Dec 2025 | Seed1.8 | 41 | DeepConsult |
2 system cards report it, from 1 lab
Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.
| Date | Document | Score | As the document writes it | Section |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 21 Mar 2026 | Seed1.8 model card | 41 | DeepConsult (Table 4) | Capabilities |
| 14 Feb 2026 | Seed2.0 Pro model card | 61.1 | DeepConsult (Table 11) | Capabilities |
More in Tool use
- AutomationBench In use Agent completes end-to-end business workflows inside a simulated company exposing dozens of REST APIs. Graded on resulting state.
Gemini 4 Carbon 53.9% - MCP Atlas In use Multi-step workflows over real MCP servers. Scores tool-use competency on realistic tasks.
Muse Spark 1.1 88.1% - BFCL V4 In use Models call functions and tools, including multi-turn agentic tasks with web search and memory. Checked against expected calls and outcomes.
Qwen3.7-Max 75% - τ³-bench Banking In use Agents act as banking customer-service reps over many turns with a simulated user, following policy. Pass^1 on the final database state. Qwen 3.8 Max 55.1%
- Claw-Eval In use 300 human-verified agent tasks (service orchestration, multimodal, multi-turn dialogue) audited via traces and snapshots. Rubric scores with Pass^3 consistency. Claude Sonnet 4.6 81.4%
- DeepSearchQA In use Questions that need multi-step search and synthesis. Final answers graded against references. Kimi K3 95%