Cyber key skills benchmark v1
Agents solve 50 capture-the-flag challenges built with a third party on reconnaissance, tool development, tool use and operational security. 12 are hard.
In-house Google evaluation built with Irregular. The Gemini 4 report renames key skills CyScenarioBench, kept separate because versions differ.
In the authors’ words
As frontier AI models become more capable, evaluating their potential to enable cyberattacks is crucial for ensuring the safe development of Artificial General Intelligence (AGI). Current cyber evaluation efforts are often ad-hoc, lacking systematic analysis of attack phases and guidance on targeted defenses. This work introduces a novel evaluation framework that addresses these limitations by: (1) examining the end-to-end attack chain, (2) identifying gaps in AI threat evaluation, and (3) helping defenders prioritize targeted mitigations and conduct AI-enabled adversary emulation for red teaming. Our approach adapts existing cyberattack chain frameworks for AI systems. We analyzed over 12,000 real-world instances of AI involvement in cyber incidents, catalogued by Google's Threat Intelligence Group, to curate seven representative attack chain archetypes. Through a bottleneck analysis on these archetypes, we pinpointed phases most susceptible to AI-driven disruption. We then identified and utilized externally developed cybersecurity model evaluations focused on these critical phases. We report on AI's potential to amplify offensive capabilities across specific attack stages, and offer recommendations for prioritizing defenses. We believe this represents the most comprehensive AI cyber risk evaluation framework published to date.
- Level
- Expert Specialists with years of training, often over hours of work
- Scored
- Checked automatically A program checks the result against an answer key, unit tests or the expected final state.
- Answers
- Agent task Many steps in a terminal, browser, desktop, app, game or robot.
Gemini 3 Pro leads with 91.7% among models released by Nov 2025
Best score per model as labs report them in their own cards. Labs pick their own settings, so these compare less cleanly than independent runs.
The newest model with a score here came out in Nov 2025, and nobody has reported a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:
- GPT-6 Astra
- Claude Opus 5.5
- GPT-6.1 Terra
- GPT-6.1 Sol
- and 16 more
- 1
Gemini 3 Pro 91.7%
- 2
Gemini 2.5 Pro Jun 2025 50%
- 3
Gemini 2.5 Pro Mar 2025 33.3%
- 4
Gemini 2.5 Flash Jun 2025 8.30%
| # | Model | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | | 91.7% | Nov 2025 | Model card | |
| 2 | | 50% | Jul 2025 | Model card | |
| 3 | | 33.3% | Apr 2025 | Model card | |
| 4 | | 8.30% | Jul 2025 | Model card |
3 models have held number one since its release in Mar 2025
Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.
The best score passed 85% in Nov 2025
All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.
Labs report it only in system cards
We read the headline results of 479 launch posts from 51 labs, and none of them list this benchmark. Some system cards do, below.
4 system cards report it, from 1 lab
Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.
| Date | Document | Score | As the document writes it | Section |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18 Nov 2025 | | 91.7 | Key skills benchmark v1, hard challenges solved: 11/12, alert threshold met (FSF table p.5, Figure 2) | Cyber risk |
| 7 Jul 2025 | | 50 | Key skills benchmark (48 challenges), hard challenges solved 6/12; easy 7/8, medium 14/28 (Table 10; Figure 11 prints 15/28 medium) | Cyber risk |
| 7 Jul 2025 | | 8.3 | Key skills benchmark (48 challenges), hard challenges solved 1/12; easy 6/8, medium 8/28 (Figure 11 bar labels) | Cyber risk |
| 28 Apr 2025 | | 33.3 | New comprehensive benchmark (50 challenges), hard challenges solved 4/12; very easy 2/2, easy 6/8, medium 11/28 (Table 1, Figure 3) | Cyber risk |
More in Cybersecurity
- ExploitGym In use 869 real-vulnerability exploit-development tasks (userspace, V8, Linux kernel). Success means capturing a flag through the intended vulnerability. GPT-6 Astra 42.4%
- ExploitBench In use 41 recent V8 JavaScript-engine N-day vulnerabilities. Progress measured by 16 grader-verified capability flags across five tiers. GPT-6 Astra 100%
- CWE-bench In use Agents audit a repository and write a patch for a security flaw, without being told where the bug is. Covers six programming languages.
Gemini 4 Carbon 71%
- Real-world vulnerability discovery In use Agents search popular open-source codebases to rediscover about 1,200 recent confirmed vulnerabilities across many languages. Reports share discovered.
Gemini 4 Argon 86%
- Artificial Analysis Cyber Index In use Agents do enterprise cyber defense tasks from three benchmarks, CWE-Bench-AA, DeepsecBench-AA and CyberGym-E2E-AA, combined into one success rate.
Mistral Large 4 (Le Chonk, open weights) 51%
- Big Sleep Evaluation (Google) In use Agents search large real codebases such as Chrome and Safari for critical, hard to find vulnerabilities. Scored by pass@1 success rate, run without safety guardrails.
Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber 72%