Benchmark Almanac

CVE-Bench

GPT-5.6 Sol 94.1% leads since Aug 2026 Only in system cards

Real-world web-application CVEs in sandboxed services. Agent is scored on reaching predefined attack objectives.

40 critical-severity CVEs in live web applications, released 31 March 2025 with reference exploits on request. ICML 2025 spotlight. Apache 2.0. Superseded by CVE-Bench 2, whose grader changed the evaluation criteria.

In the authors’ words

Large language model (LLM) agents are increasingly capable of autonomously conducting cyberattacks, posing significant threats to existing applications. This growing risk highlights the urgent need for a real-world benchmark to evaluate the ability of LLM agents to exploit web application vulnerabilities. However, existing benchmarks fall short as they are limited to abstracted Capture the Flag competitions or lack comprehensive coverage. Building a benchmark for real-world vulnerabilities involves both specialized expertise to reproduce exploits and a systematic approach to evaluating unpredictable threats. To address this challenge, we introduce CVE-Bench, a real-world cybersecurity benchmark based on critical-severity Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures. In CVE-Bench, we design a sandbox framework that enables LLM agents to exploit vulnerable web applications in scenarios that mimic real-world conditions, while also providing effective evaluation of their exploits. Our evaluation shows that the state-of-the-art agent framework can resolve up to 13% of vulnerabilities.

Abstract of CVE-Bench: A Benchmark for AI Agents' Ability to Exploit Real-World Web Application Vulnerabilities (arXiv:2503.17332, CC0)
Made by UIUC (Kang Lab) Released Mar 2025 Finding and exploiting real bugs All tasks public Last in a system card Sep 2026 Last model added Sep 2026
Level
Expert Specialists with years of training, often over hours of work
Scored
Checked automatically A program checks the result against an answer key, unit tests or the expected final state.
Answers
Agent task Many steps in a terminal, browser, desktop, app, game or robot.
14
Models scored in lab cards
20
System cards report it, from 3 labs

GPT-5.6 Sol leads with 94.1%

Best score per model as labs report them in their own cards. Labs pick their own settings, so these compare less cleanly than independent runs.

  1. 1 GPT-5.6 Sol 94.1%
  2. 2 GPT-5.5 Pro 93.1%
  3. 3 GPT-5.5 93.1%
  4. 4 GPT-5.5 Instant 90.2%
  5. 5 GPT-5.3 Codex 90%
  6. 6 GPT-5.2 Codex 87%
  7. 7 GPT-5.4 86.3%
  8. 8 GPT-5.4 Mini 83.3%
  9. 9 GPT-5.6 Luna 82.3%
  10. 10 GPT-5.1-Codex-Max 80%
  11. 11 GPT-5.2 69%
  12. 12 Grok 4.6 39.8%
  13. 13 Grok 4.7 36.6%
  14. 14 MAI-Cyber-1-Flash 31.4%
#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 GPT-5.6 Sol 94.1% Aug 2026 Model card
2 GPT-5.5 Pro 93.1% Apr 2026 Model card
3 GPT-5.5 93.1% Apr 2026 Model card
4 GPT-5.5 Instant 90.2% May 2026 Model card
5 GPT-5.3 Codex 90% Feb 2026 Model card
6 GPT-5.2 Codex 87% Dec 2025 Model card
7 GPT-5.4 86.3% Mar 2026 Model card
8 GPT-5.4 Mini 83.3% Mar 2026 Model card
9 GPT-5.6 Luna 82.3% Aug 2026 Model card
10 GPT-5.1-Codex-Max 80% Nov 2025 Model card
11 GPT-5.2 69% Dec 2025 Model card
12 Grok 4.6 39.8% Aug 2026 Model card
13 Grok 4.7 36.6% Sep 2026 Model card
14 MAI-Cyber-1-Flash 31.4% Jul 2026 Model card

5 models have held number one since its release in Mar 2025

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.

OpenAI
Lab claims Passed 85% in Dec 2025, by GPT-5.2 Codex
GPT-5.6 Sol 94.1%

The best score passed 85% in Dec 2025

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

Reported by the lab in its model card Best so far
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) GPT-5.6 Sol GPT-5.5 Pro GPT-5.2 Codex GPT-5.1-Codex-Max 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) GPT-5.6 Sol GPT-5.2 Codex

Labs report it only in system cards

We read the headline results of 479 launch posts from 51 labs, and none of them list this benchmark. Some system cards do, below.

20 system cards report it, from 3 labs

Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.

DateDocumentScoreAs the document writes itSection
21 Sep 2026 Grok 4.7 model card 36.6 CVE-Bench, reward, xhigh, Grok Build harness (6.2 table). High = 37.7% Cyber risk
12 Aug 2026 Grok 4.6 model card 39.8 CVE-Bench, reward, high, without safeguards (7.2 table) Cyber risk
6 Aug 2026 GPT-5.6 Sol system card addendum 94.1 CVE-Bench v1.0, 34 of 40 challenges, zero-day prompt, pass@1, representative checkpoint, printed chart label (Figure 8, 7.1.2.2) Cyber risk
6 Aug 2026 GPT-5.6 Luna system card addendum 82.3 CVE-Bench v1.0, 34 of 40 challenges, zero-day prompt, pass@1, representative checkpoint, printed chart label (Figure 8, 7.1.2.2) Cyber risk
27 Jul 2026 MAI-Cyber-1-Flash model card 31.4 CVEBench, model-only terminal harness, printed 0.314, version not stated (External Cyber Benchmark Results) Cyber risk
9 Jul 2026 GPT-5.6 Terra system card CVE-Bench v1.0, 34 of 40 challenges, zero-day prompt, pass@1 by output tokens, chart without printed numbers (Figure 32, 9.1.2.2) Cyber risk
9 Jul 2026 GPT-5.6 Sol system card CVE-Bench v1.0, 34 of 40 challenges, zero-day prompt, pass@1 by output tokens, chart without printed numbers (Figure 32, 9.1.2.2) Cyber risk
9 Jul 2026 GPT-5.6 Luna system card CVE-Bench v1.0, 34 of 40 challenges, zero-day prompt, pass@1 by output tokens, chart without printed numbers (Figure 32, 9.1.2.2) Cyber risk
25 Jun 2026 GPT-5.6 Terra system card CVE-Bench v1.0, 34 of 40 challenges, zero-day prompt, pass@1 by output tokens, chart without printed numbers (Figure 32, 9.1.2.2) Cyber risk
25 Jun 2026 GPT-5.6 Sol system card CVE-Bench v1.0, 34 of 40 challenges, zero-day prompt, pass@1 by output tokens, chart without printed numbers (Figure 32, 9.1.2.2) Cyber risk
25 Jun 2026 GPT-5.6 Luna system card CVE-Bench v1.0, 34 of 40 challenges, zero-day prompt, pass@1 by output tokens, chart without printed numbers (Figure 32, 9.1.2.2) Cyber risk
4 May 2026 GPT-5.5 Instant system card 90.2 CVE-Bench v1.0, 34 of 40 challenges, zero-day prompt, pass@1, printed chart label (Figure 8, 8.1.2.2) Cyber risk
23 Apr 2026 GPT-5.5 system card 93.1 CVE-Bench v1.0, 34 of 40 challenges, zero-day prompt, pass@1, printed chart label (Figure 17, 9.1.2.2) Cyber risk
23 Apr 2026 GPT-5.5 Pro system card 93.1 CVE-Bench v1.0, 34 of 40 challenges, zero-day prompt, pass@1, GPT-5.5 Pro, printed chart label (Figure 17, 9.1.2.2) Cyber risk
17 Mar 2026 GPT-5.4 Mini system card 83.3 CVE-Bench, pass@1 (Table 19) Cyber risk
5 Mar 2026 GPT-5.4 system card 86.3 CVE-Bench v1.0, 34 of 40 challenges, zero-day prompt, pass@1, printed chart label (Figure 13, 5.1.2.2) Cyber risk
5 Feb 2026 GPT-5.3 Codex system card 90 CVEBench blind 0-day, pass@1, 34 of 40 challenges (Figure 6, 5.1.2.2) Cyber risk
18 Dec 2025 GPT-5.2 Codex system card addendum 87 CVEBench blind 0day, CVE-Bench v1.0, 34 of 40 challenges, zero-day prompt, pass@1 over 3 rollouts, printed chart label (Figure 6, 5.1.2.2) Cyber risk
11 Dec 2025 GPT-5.2 system card addendum 69 CVEBench blind 0day, gpt-5.2 no browsing, 34 of 40 challenges, printed chart label (Figure 10) Cyber risk
18 Nov 2025 GPT-5.1-Codex-Max system card 80 CVEBench blind 0day, CVE-Bench v1.0, 34 of 40 challenges, zero-day prompt, pass@1, printed chart label (Figure 7, 5.1.2.2) Cyber risk

Versions

More in Cybersecurity

All 111 in Cybersecurity
  • ExploitGym In use 869 real-vulnerability exploit-development tasks (userspace, V8, Linux kernel). Success means capturing a flag through the intended vulnerability. GPT-6 Astra 42.4%
  • ExploitBench In use 41 recent V8 JavaScript-engine N-day vulnerabilities. Progress measured by 16 grader-verified capability flags across five tiers. GPT-6 Astra 100%
  • CWE-bench In use Agents audit a repository and write a patch for a security flaw, without being told where the bug is. Covers six programming languages. Gemini 4 Carbon 71%
  • Real-world vulnerability discovery In use Agents search popular open-source codebases to rediscover about 1,200 recent confirmed vulnerabilities across many languages. Reports share discovered. Gemini 4 Argon 86%
  • Artificial Analysis Cyber Index In use Agents do enterprise cyber defense tasks from three benchmarks, CWE-Bench-AA, DeepsecBench-AA and CyberGym-E2E-AA, combined into one success rate. Mistral Large 4 (Le Chonk, open weights) 51%
  • Big Sleep Evaluation (Google) In use Agents search large real codebases such as Chrome and Safari for critical, hard to find vulnerabilities. Scored by pass@1 success rate, run without safety guardrails. Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber 72%