Benchmark Almanac

CrowS-Pairs

Gemma 7B 51.3% leads since Mar 2024 Only in system cards

Models choose between paired sentences that differ only in a stereotyped social group. Measures preference for the stereotyped sentence.

A score of 50 percent means no preference between stereotyped and anti-stereotyped sentences.

In the authors’ words

Pretrained language models, especially masked language models (MLMs) have seen success across many NLP tasks. However, there is ample evidence that they use the cultural biases that are undoubtedly present in the corpora they are trained on, implicitly creating harm with biased representations. To measure some forms of social bias in language models against protected demographic groups in the US, we introduce the Crowdsourced Stereotype Pairs benchmark (CrowS-Pairs). CrowS-Pairs has 1508 examples that cover stereotypes dealing with nine types of bias, like race, religion, and age. In CrowS-Pairs a model is presented with two sentences: one that is more stereotyping and another that is less stereotyping. The data focuses on stereotypes about historically disadvantaged groups and contrasts them with advantaged groups. We find that all three of the widely-used MLMs we evaluate substantially favor sentences that express stereotypes in every category in CrowS-Pairs. As work on building less biased models advances, this dataset can be used as a benchmark to evaluate progress.

Abstract of CrowS-Pairs: A Challenge Dataset for Measuring Social Biases in Masked Language Models (arXiv:2010.00133, CC0)
Made by NYU (Nangia et al.) Released Sep 2020 Bias, fairness and politics All tasks public Last in a system card Jul 2024 Last model added Jul 2024
Level
Everyday Most adults, without training
Scored
Checked automatically A program checks the result against an answer key, unit tests or the expected final state.
Answers
Multiple choice
4
Models scored in lab cards
4
System cards report it, from 1 lab

Gemma 7B leads with 51.3% among models released by Jun 2024

Best score per model as labs report them in their own cards. Labs pick their own settings, so these compare less cleanly than independent runs.

The newest model with a score here came out in Jun 2024, and nobody has reported a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:

  1. 1 Gemma 7B 51.3%
  2. 2 Gemma 2B 45.8%
  3. 3 Gemma 2 9B 37.5%
  4. 4 Gemma 2 27B 36.7%
#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 Gemma 7B 51.3% Mar 2024 Model card
2 Gemma 2B 45.8% Mar 2024 Model card
3 Gemma 2 9B 37.5% Jul 2024 Model card
4 Gemma 2 27B 36.7% Jul 2024 Model card

Number one over time

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.

Google DeepMind
Lab claims Not tested since Jul 2024
Gemma 7B 51.3%

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

Reported by the lab in its model card
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2024 Near the ceiling (85%) Gemma 7B 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2024 Near the ceiling (85%) Gemma 7B

Labs report it only in system cards

We read the headline results of 479 launch posts from 51 labs, and none of them list this benchmark. Some system cards do, below.

4 system cards report it, from 1 lab

Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.

DateDocumentScoreAs the document writes itSection
31 Jul 2024 Gemma 2 9B technical report 37.5 CrowS-Pairs, top-1, IT (Table 18) Bias
31 Jul 2024 Gemma 2 27B technical report 36.7 CrowS-Pairs, top-1, IT (Table 18) Bias
13 Mar 2024 Gemma 7B technical report 51.3 CrowS-Pairs, top-1, IT (Table 8) Bias
13 Mar 2024 Gemma 2B technical report 45.8 CrowS-Pairs, top-1, IT (Table 8) Bias

More in Safety and alignment

All 444 in Safety and alignment
  • FORTRESS In use Paired adversarial and benign national-security misuse prompts. Rubric-graded risk score on adversarial and over-refusal score on benign prompts. Claude Opus 5.5 5.78%
  • StrongREJECT In use Forbidden-prompt jailbreak benchmark with a rubric grader that scores how useful a non-refusal actually is. Inkling 98.6%
  • AgentDojo In use Agents do tool-use tasks while tools and data carry prompt injections. Attack success rate counts hijacked runs. Grok 4 Fast 0%
  • MASK In use Measures whether a model contradicts its own elicited beliefs under pressure to lie. Honesty separated from accuracy. Muse Spark Open 98.1%
  • Gray Swan IPI Arena benchmark In use Indirect prompt-injection attacks from public red-teaming competitions replayed on tool, coding and browser agents. Attack success rate at k attempts. GPT-6 Astra 8.50%
  • Agentic misalignment suite (Anthropic) In use Agents in simulated company settings face threats or goal conflicts that invite blackmail, leaking or sabotage. Score is the misaligned action rate. Claude Sonnet 4.5 0%