Benchmark Almanac

ComplexFuncBench

Hunyuan-A13B-Instruct 61.2% leads since Jun 2025 Dropped

Models make function calls for 1,000 travel booking style samples that need several steps, user constraints, implicit parameter reasoning, long parameter values or 128K context.

The ComplexEval framework scores both the calls and the final answer.

In the authors’ words

Enhancing large language models (LLMs) with real-time APIs can help generate more accurate and up-to-date responses. However, evaluating the function calling abilities of LLMs in real-world scenarios remains under-explored due to the complexity of data collection and evaluation. In this work, we introduce ComplexFuncBench, a benchmark for complex function calling across five real-world scenarios. Compared to existing benchmarks, ComplexFuncBench encompasses multi-step and constrained function calling, which requires long-parameter filing, parameter value reasoning, and 128k long context. Additionally, we propose an automatic framework, ComplexEval, for quantitatively evaluating complex function calling tasks. Through comprehensive experiments, we demonstrate the deficiencies of state-of-the-art LLMs in function calling and suggest future directions for optimizing these capabilities. The data and code are available at https://github.com/THUDM/ComplexFuncBench.

Abstract of ComplexFuncBench: Exploring Multi-Step and Constrained Function Calling under Long-Context Scenario (arXiv:2501.10132, CC0)
Made by Zhipu AI and Tsinghua University (THUDM) Released Jan 2025 Function calling All tasks public Last in a launch post Jun 2025 , dropped before it saturated Last model added Jun 2025
Level
University Undergraduates and entry-level professionals
Scored
Checked automatically A program checks the result against an answer key, unit tests or the expected final state.
Answers
Agent task Many steps in a terminal, browser, desktop, app, game or robot.
3
Models scored in lab cards
3
Launch posts list it, from 2 labs
1
System card reports it, from 1 lab

Hunyuan-A13B-Instruct leads with 61.2% among models released by Jun 2025

Best score per model as labs report them in their own cards. Labs pick their own settings, so these compare less cleanly than independent runs.

The newest model with a score here came out in Jun 2025, and nobody has reported a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:

  1. 1 Hunyuan-A13B-Instruct 61.2%
  2. 2 GPT-4.1 mini 49.3%
  3. 3 GPT-4.1 nano 5.70%
#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 Hunyuan-A13B-Instruct 61.2% Jun 2025 Model card
2 GPT-4.1 mini 49.3% Apr 2025 Model card
3 GPT-4.1 nano 5.70% Apr 2025 Model card

2 models have held number one since its release in Jan 2025

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.

OpenAI Tencent
Lab claims Not tested since Jun 2025

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

Reported by the lab in its model card Best so far
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2025 Near the ceiling (85%) Hunyuan-A13B-Instruct GPT-4.1 mini 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2025 Near the ceiling (85%) Hunyuan-A13B-Instruct GPT-4.1 mini

No launch post has listed it since Jun 2025

Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.

OpenAI
Tencent
DateLaunch postScoreAs the post writes it
27 Jun 2025 Hunyuan-A13B-Instruct 61.2 ComplexFuncBench
14 Apr 2025 GPT-4.1 nano 5.7 ComplexFuncBench
14 Apr 2025 GPT-4.1 mini 49.3 ComplexFuncBench

One system card reports it

Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.

DateDocumentScoreAs the document writes itSection
26 Jun 2025 Hunyuan-A13B-Instruct technical report 61.2 ComplexFuncBench, slow-thinking (Table 3). Fast-thinking 74.0 (Table 4) Capabilities

More in Tool use

All 125 in Tool use
  • AutomationBench In use Agent completes end-to-end business workflows inside a simulated company exposing dozens of REST APIs. Graded on resulting state. Gemini 4 Carbon 53.9%
  • MCP Atlas In use Multi-step workflows over real MCP servers. Scores tool-use competency on realistic tasks. Muse Spark 1.1 88.1%
  • BFCL V4 In use Models call functions and tools, including multi-turn agentic tasks with web search and memory. Checked against expected calls and outcomes. Qwen3.7-Max 75%
  • τ³-bench Banking In use Agents act as banking customer-service reps over many turns with a simulated user, following policy. Pass^1 on the final database state. Qwen 3.8 Max 55.1%
  • Claw-Eval In use 300 human-verified agent tasks (service orchestration, multimodal, multi-turn dialogue) audited via traces and snapshots. Rubric scores with Pass^3 consistency. Claude Sonnet 4.6 81.4%
  • DeepSearchQA In use Questions that need multi-step search and synthesis. Final answers graded against references. Kimi K3 95%