Benchmark Almanac

COLLIE

GPT-5 99% leads since Aug 2025 Fading

Models generate text that meets compositional constraints at word, sentence, paragraph, and passage level. Scored by the share passing automatic constraint checks.

In the authors’ words

Text generation under constraints have seen increasing interests in natural language processing, especially with the rapidly improving capabilities of large language models. However, existing benchmarks for constrained generation usually focus on fixed constraint types (e.g.,generate a sentence containing certain words) that have proved to be easy for state-of-the-art models like GPT-4. We present COLLIE, a grammar-based framework that allows the specification of rich, compositional constraints with diverse generation levels (word, sentence, paragraph, passage) and modeling challenges (e.g.,language understanding, logical reasoning, counting, semantic planning). We also develop tools for automatic extraction of task instances given a constraint structure and a raw text corpus. Using COLLIE, we compile the COLLIE-v1 dataset with 2080 instances comprising 13 constraint structures. We perform systematic experiments across five state-of-the-art instruction-tuned language models and analyze their performances to reveal shortcomings. COLLIE is designed to be extensible and lightweight, and we hope the community finds it useful to develop more complex constraints and evaluations in the future.

Abstract of COLLIE: Systematic Construction of Constrained Text Generation Tasks (arXiv:2307.08689, CC0)
Made by Princeton NLP Released Jul 2023 Following precise instructions All tasks public Last in a launch post May 2026 , dropped after it saturated Last model added May 2026
Level
Everyday Most adults, without training
Scored
Checked automatically A program checks the result against an answer key, unit tests or the expected final state.
Answers
Open-ended Free-form text, documents, designs or media judged as a whole.
12
Models scored in lab cards
12
Launch posts list it, from 4 labs
5
System cards report it, from 2 labs

GPT-5 leads with 99% among models released by Apr 2026

Best score per model as labs report them in their own cards. Labs pick their own settings, so these compare less cleanly than independent runs.

The newest model with a score here came out in Apr 2026, and nobody has reported a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:

  1. 1 GPT-5 99%
  2. 2 GPT-5 mini 98.5%
  3. 3 GPT-5 nano 96.9%
  4. 4 Mistral Medium 3.5 95.8%
  5. 5 Seed2.0 Pro 93.9%
  6. 6 Seed-Thinking-v1.5 73.1%
  7. 7 Seed1.8 72.6%
  8. 8 Mistral Small 4 62.9%
  9. 9 LongCat-Flash-Chat 57.1%
  10. 10 GPT-4.1 mini 54.6%
  11. 11 LongCat-Flash-Omni 45.7%
  12. 12 GPT-4.1 nano 42.5%
#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 GPT-5 99% Aug 2025 Model card
2 GPT-5 mini 98.5% Aug 2025 Model card
3 GPT-5 nano 96.9% Aug 2025 Model card
4 Mistral Medium 3.5 95.8% May 2026 Model card
5 Seed2.0 Pro 93.9% Feb 2026 Model card
6 Seed-Thinking-v1.5 73.1% Apr 2025 Model card
7 Seed1.8 72.6% Dec 2025 Model card
8 Mistral Small 4 62.9% Mar 2026 Model card
9 LongCat-Flash-Chat 57.1% Aug 2025 Model card
10 GPT-4.1 mini 54.6% Apr 2025 Model card
11 LongCat-Flash-Omni 45.7% Oct 2025 Model card
12 GPT-4.1 nano 42.5% Apr 2025 Model card

2 models have held number one since its release in Jul 2023

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.

ByteDance Seed OpenAI
Lab claims Passed 85% in Aug 2025, by GPT-5
GPT-5 99%

The best score passed 85% in Aug 2025

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

Reported by the lab in its model card Best so far
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2025 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) GPT-5 Seed-Thinking-v1.5 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2025 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) GPT-5 Seed-Thinking-v1.5

Labs headline it less often now, last in May 2026

Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.

ByteDance Seed
OpenAI
Meituan
Mistral AI
DateLaunch postScoreAs the post writes it
22 May 2026 Mistral Medium 3.5 95.8 Collie
16 Mar 2026 Mistral Small 4 62.9 Collie [Mistral Small 4 - High]
14 Feb 2026 Seed2.0 Pro 93.9 COLLIE
18 Dec 2025 Seed1.8 72.6 Collie-Hard
31 Oct 2025 LongCat-Flash-Omni 45.7 COLLIE(acc)
29 Aug 2025 LongCat-Flash-Chat 57.1 COLLIE(acc)
7 Aug 2025 GPT-5 nano 96.9 COLLIE
7 Aug 2025 GPT-5 mini 98.5 COLLIE
7 Aug 2025 GPT-5 99 COLLIE Instruction-following in freeform writing
14 Apr 2025 GPT-4.1 nano 42.5 COLLIE
14 Apr 2025 GPT-4.1 mini 54.6 COLLIE
10 Apr 2025 Seed-Thinking-v1.5 73.1 Collie

5 system cards report it, from 2 labs

Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.

DateDocumentScoreAs the document writes itSection
21 Mar 2026 Seed1.8 model card 72.6 Collie-Hard (Table 1) Capabilities
14 Feb 2026 Seed2.0 Pro model card 93.9 COLLIE (Table 3) Capabilities
31 Oct 2025 LongCat-Flash-Omni technical report 45.7 COLLIE (acc) (Table 13) Capabilities
1 Sep 2025 LongCat-Flash-Chat technical report 57.1 COLLIE (acc) (Table 3) Capabilities
10 Apr 2025 Seed-Thinking-v1.5 technical report 73.1 Collie (Table 2) Capabilities

More in Instructions and chat

All 76 in Instructions and chat
  • IFEval In use Models answer about 500 prompts containing verifiable instructions such as word limits or required keywords. Code checks each instruction for strict and loose accuracy. Gemma 4 31B IT 98.9%
  • IFBench In use 58 new out-of-domain verifiable output constraints. Scored by programmatic constraint checks (strict or loose). Nemotron-Cascade 2 30B-A3B 82.9%
  • MultiChallenge In use Multi-turn conversations testing instruction retention, inference memory, versioned editing and self-coherence. Graded by LLM judge with rubrics. GPT-6.1 Sol 82%
  • Multi-IF In use Models follow verifiable instructions over three-turn conversations in eight languages, extending IFEval. Scored by instruction accuracy at each turn. LFM3-1.7B 89.1%
  • AdvancedIF In use Models respond to over 1,600 prompts with complex, multi-turn, and system-level instructions. A judge model checks each response against expert-written rubrics. MAI-Thinking-1 85%
  • IFStruct In use Models generate JSON or YAML that must follow a requested schema and phrasing constraints, without constrained decoding. A response passes only if every structural constraint holds. LFM3-1.7B 93.7%