Benchmark Almanac

Coding (MiniMax in-house)

MiniMax-Text-01 90.2% Only in system cards

Models answer coding requests from real Hailuo AI users. The report does not describe the scoring.

In-house MiniMax evaluation built mostly from Hailuo AI user queries in Mandarin. The queries are not public.

Made by MiniMax Released Jan 2025 Function-level problems Tasks kept private Last in a system card Jan 2025 Last model added Jan 2025
Level
University Undergraduates and entry-level professionals
Scored
Graded by a model A language model scores each response, usually against a rubric.
Answers
Code A program or patch run against tests.
1
Model scored in lab cards
1
System card reports it, from 1 lab

MiniMax-Text-01 leads with 90.2%

Best score per model as labs report them in their own cards. Labs pick their own settings, so these compare less cleanly than independent runs.

  1. 1 MiniMax-Text-01 90.2%
#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 MiniMax-Text-01 90.2% Jan 2025 Model card

The best score passed 85% in Jan 2025

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

Reported by the lab in its model card
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2025 Near the ceiling (85%) MiniMax-Text-01 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2025 Near the ceiling (85%) MiniMax-Text-01

Labs report it only in system cards

We read the headline results of 479 launch posts from 51 labs, and none of them list this benchmark. Some system cards do, below.

One system card reports it

Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.

DateDocumentScoreAs the document writes itSection
14 Jan 2025 MiniMax-Text-01 technical report 90.2 In-house Coding (Table 12) Capabilities

More in Coding

All 243 in Coding
  • SWE-bench Verified In use 500 human-validated GitHub issues from 12 Python repos. Agent writes a patch that must pass hidden tests. Claude Opus 4.7 83.5%
  • SWE-bench Multilingual In use 300 GitHub-issue tasks across nine programming languages in SWE-bench format. Patch graded by repository tests. Claude Opus 5.5 93.9%
  • LiveCodeBench v6 In use Competitive programming problems collected after model cutoffs from LeetCode, AtCoder, Codeforces. Scored pass@1 on hidden tests. DeepSeek-V4-Pro 93.5%
  • DeepSWE In use 113 original long-horizon engineering tasks across 91 repos and five languages, written from scratch. Hand-written verifiers accept alternative solutions. GPT-6 Astra 74.1%
  • SciCode In use Scientist-curated research coding problems split into subproblems across natural sciences. Code checked against test cases. Seed2.1 Pro 59.8%
  • Codeforces rating In use Model solves recent Codeforces contest problems. An Elo-style rating is computed from simulated contest performance. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 3,471