CMMLU
Chinese multiple-choice questions across 67 subjects including China-specific topics. Accuracy.
Saturated. HF dataset haonan-li/cmmlu now redirects to lmlmcat/cmmlu.
In the authors’ words
As the capabilities of large language models (LLMs) continue to advance, evaluating their performance becomes increasingly crucial and challenging. This paper aims to bridge this gap by introducing CMMLU, a comprehensive Chinese benchmark that covers various subjects, including natural science, social sciences, engineering, and humanities. We conduct a thorough evaluation of 18 advanced multilingual- and Chinese-oriented LLMs, assessing their performance across different subjects and settings. The results reveal that most existing LLMs struggle to achieve an average accuracy of 50%, even when provided with in-context examples and chain-of-thought prompts, whereas the random baseline stands at 25%. This highlights significant room for improvement in LLMs. Additionally, we conduct extensive experiments to identify factors impacting the models' performance and propose directions for enhancing LLMs. CMMLU fills the gap in evaluating the knowledge and reasoning capabilities of large language models within the Chinese context.
- Level
- University Undergraduates and entry-level professionals
- Scored
- Checked automatically A program checks the result against an answer key, unit tests or the expected final state.
- Answers
- Multiple choice
2 models share the top score of 90.8% among models released by Apr 2026
Best score per model as labs report them in their own cards. Labs pick their own settings, so these compare less cleanly than independent runs.
The newest model with a score here came out in Apr 2026, and nobody has reported a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:
- GPT-6 Astra
- Claude Opus 5.5
- GPT-6.1 Terra
- GPT-6.1 Sol
- and 16 more
- 90.8
Hunyuan-TurboS
- 90.8
DeepSeek-V4-Pro
- 90.2
ERNIE-4.5-300B-A47B
- 90.2
InternVL3.5-241B-A28B
- 90.1
Qwen2-72B
- 90.0
Hunyuan-T1
- 89.4
LongCat-Flash-Omni
- 89.1
Ring-1T
- 88.8
DeepSeek-V3
- 84.3
LongCat-Flash-Chat
- 83.5
Qwen1.5-72B
- 83.1
InternLM3-8B-Instruct
- 81.6
DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024)
- 78.2 Moonlight-16B-A3B
- 71.0
Qwen-14B
- 67.8
DeepSeek LLM 67B
- 67.5 ChatGLM3-6B
- 1
Hunyuan-TurboS 90.8%
- 2
DeepSeek-V4-Pro 90.8%
- 3
ERNIE-4.5-300B-A47B 90.2%
- 4
InternVL3.5-241B-A28B 90.2%
- 5
Qwen2-72B 90.1%
- 6
Hunyuan-T1 90%
- 7
LongCat-Flash-Omni 89.4%
- 8
Ring-1T 89.1%
- 9
DeepSeek-V3 88.8%
- 10
LongCat-Flash-Chat 84.3%
- 11
Qwen1.5-72B 83.5%
- 12
InternLM3-8B-Instruct 83.1%
- 13
DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024) 81.6%
- 14 Moonlight-16B-A3B 78.2%
- 15
Qwen-14B 71%
- 16
DeepSeek LLM 67B 67.8%
- 17 ChatGLM3-6B 67.5%
| # | Model | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | | 90.8% | Feb 2025 | Model card | |
| 2 | | 90.8% | Apr 2026 | Model card | |
| 3 | | 90.2% | Jun 2025 | Model card | |
| 4 | | 90.2% | Aug 2025 | Model card | |
| 5 | | 90.1% | Jun 2024 | Model card | |
| 6 | | 90% | Mar 2025 | Model card | |
| 7 | | 89.4% | Oct 2025 | Model card | |
| 8 | | 89.1% | Oct 2025 | Model card | |
| 9 | | 88.8% | Dec 2024 | Model card | |
| 10 | | 84.3% | Aug 2025 | Model card | |
| 11 | | 83.5% | Feb 2024 | Model card | |
| 12 | | 83.1% | Jan 2025 | Model card | |
| 13 | | 81.6% | May 2024 | Model card | |
| 14 | Moonlight-16B-A3B | 78.2% | Feb 2025 | Model card | |
| 15 | | 71% | Sep 2023 | Model card | |
| 16 | | 67.8% | Nov 2023 | Model card | |
| 17 | ChatGLM3-6B | 67.5% | Oct 2023 | Model card |
4 models have held number one since its release in Jun 2023
Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.
The best score passed 85% in Jun 2024
All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.
Labs headline it less often now, last in Apr 2026
Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.
| Date | Launch post | Score | As the post writes it |
|---|---|---|---|
| 24 Apr 2026 | 90.8 | CMMLU (EM) | |
| 31 Oct 2025 | 89.4 | CMMLU(acc) | |
| 29 Aug 2025 | 84.3 | CMMLU(acc) | |
| 30 Jun 2025 | 90.2 | CMMLU | |
| 21 Mar 2025 | 90 | CMMLU | |
| 16 Mar 2025 | CMMLU | ||
| 27 Feb 2025 | 90.8 | CMMLU | |
| 22 Feb 2025 | Moonlight-16B-A3B | 78.2 | CMMLU |
| 28 Jan 2025 | CMMLU | ||
| 13 Jan 2025 | 83.1 | CMMLU(0-shot) | |
| 26 Dec 2024 | 88.8 | CMMLU (Acc.) | |
| 7 Jun 2024 | 90.1 | CMMLU | |
| 7 May 2024 | 81.6 | CMMLU | |
| 5 Feb 2024 | 83.5 | CMMLU | |
| 29 Nov 2023 | 67.8 | CMMLU | |
| 27 Oct 2023 | ChatGLM3-6B | 67.5 | CMMLU |
| 25 Sep 2023 | 71 | CMMLU (5-shot) |
8 system cards report it, from 6 labs
Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.
| Date | Document | Score | As the document writes it | Section |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 31 Oct 2025 | | 89.4 | CMMLU (acc) (Table 13) | Capabilities |
| 21 Oct 2025 | | 89.1 | CMMLU (Table 1) | Capabilities |
| 1 Sep 2025 | | 84.3 | CMMLU (acc) (Table 3) | Capabilities |
| 25 Aug 2025 | | 90.2 | CMMLU, OpenCompass (Table 14) | Capabilities |
| 29 Jun 2025 | | 90.2 | CMMLU (Table 5) | Capabilities |
| 18 Jun 2024 | ChatGLM3-6B technical report | 67.5 | ChatGLM3-6B-Base, CMMLU (Table 1) | Capabilities |
| 7 May 2024 | | 81.6 | CMMLU 5-shot, DeepSeek-V2 Chat (RL) (Table 3) | Capabilities |
| 5 Jan 2024 | | 67.8 | CMMLU 0-shot, DeepSeek 67B Chat (Table 6) | Capabilities |
More in Knowledge
- MMLU-Pro In use Harder 10-option version of MMLU with reasoning-focused questions across 14 subjects.
Intern-S2-397B 89.8%
- SuperGPQA In use 26,529 graduate-level multiple-choice questions across 285 disciplines. Accuracy.
Qwen 3.6 Max (Preview) 73.9%
- WideSearch In use 200 bilingual broad info-seeking tasks: agent collects many atomic facts into a table. Scored by success rate and row/item F1.
Tencent Hy4 preview 83.9%
- KMMLU-Pro In use Models answer multiple-choice questions taken from Korean National Professional Licensure exams. It tests professional knowledge used in Korean industry.
Solar Pro 4 79.2%
- BIG-Bench Extra Hard In use Models solve harder replacements for each of the 23 BIG-Bench Hard tasks, 4,520 examples in total. The score is a harmonic mean of task accuracies.
Gemma 4 31B IT 74.4%
- HLE-Verified In use Verified and revised version of Humanity's Last Exam (1,811 items) with uncertain items removed.
Seed2.0 Pro 73.6%