Benchmark Almanac

CFBench

Hunyuan-T1 81% leads since Mar 2025 Dropped

Models follow 1,000 real-world instructions with embedded constraints, across more than 200 scenarios and 50 NLP tasks. A judge checks each constraint and the overall requirement.

Constraints fall into 10 primary types and over 25 subtypes.

In the authors’ words

The adeptness of Large Language Models (LLMs) in comprehending and following natural language instructions is critical for their deployment in sophisticated real-world applications. Existing evaluations mainly focus on fragmented constraints or narrow scenarios, but they overlook the comprehensiveness and authenticity of constraints from the user's perspective. To bridge this gap, we propose CFBench, a large-scale Comprehensive Constraints Following Benchmark for LLMs, featuring 1,000 curated samples that cover more than 200 real-life scenarios and over 50 NLP tasks. CFBench meticulously compiles constraints from real-world instructions and constructs an innovative systematic framework for constraint types, which includes 10 primary categories and over 25 subcategories, and ensures each constraint is seamlessly integrated within the instructions. To make certain that the evaluation of LLM outputs aligns with user perceptions, we propose an advanced methodology that integrates multi-dimensional assessment criteria with requirement prioritization, covering various perspectives of constraints, instructions, and requirement fulfillment. Evaluating current leading LLMs on CFBench reveals substantial room for improvement in constraints following, and we further investigate influencing factors and enhancement strategies. The data and code are publicly available at https://github.com/PKU-Baichuan-MLSystemLab/CFBench

Abstract of CFBench: A Comprehensive Constraints-Following Benchmark for LLMs (arXiv:2408.01122, CC0)
Made by Baichuan and Peking University Released Aug 2024 Following precise instructions All tasks public Last in a launch post Aug 2025 , dropped before it saturated Last model added Sep 2025
Level
Everyday Most adults, without training
Scored
Graded by a model A language model scores each response, usually against a rubric.
Answers
Open-ended Free-form text, documents, designs or media judged as a whole.
2
Models scored in lab cards
2
Launch posts list it, from 2 labs
1
System card reports it, from 1 lab

Hunyuan-T1 leads with 81%

Best score per model as labs report them in their own cards. Labs pick their own settings, so these compare less cleanly than independent runs.

  1. 1 Hunyuan-T1 81%
  2. 2 Baichuan-M2-32B 77.6%
#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 Hunyuan-T1 81% Mar 2025 Model card
2 Baichuan-M2-32B 77.6% Aug 2025 Model card

Number one over time

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.

Tencent
Lab claims Not tested since Sep 2025

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

Reported by the lab in its model card
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2025 Near the ceiling (85%) Hunyuan-T1 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2025 Near the ceiling (85%) Hunyuan-T1

No launch post has listed it since Aug 2025

Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.

Tencent
Baichuan
DateLaunch postScoreAs the post writes it
10 Aug 2025 Baichuan-M2-32B 77.6 CFBench
21 Mar 2025 Hunyuan-T1 81 CFBench

One system card reports it

Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.

DateDocumentScoreAs the document writes itSection
2 Sep 2025 Baichuan-M2-32B technical report 77.6 CF-Bench (Table 1) Capabilities

More in Instructions and chat

All 76 in Instructions and chat
  • IFEval In use Models answer about 500 prompts containing verifiable instructions such as word limits or required keywords. Code checks each instruction for strict and loose accuracy. Gemma 4 31B IT 98.9%
  • IFBench In use 58 new out-of-domain verifiable output constraints. Scored by programmatic constraint checks (strict or loose). Nemotron-Cascade 2 30B-A3B 82.9%
  • MultiChallenge In use Multi-turn conversations testing instruction retention, inference memory, versioned editing and self-coherence. Graded by LLM judge with rubrics. GPT-6.1 Sol 82%
  • Multi-IF In use Models follow verifiable instructions over three-turn conversations in eight languages, extending IFEval. Scored by instruction accuracy at each turn. LFM3-1.7B 89.1%
  • AdvancedIF In use Models respond to over 1,600 prompts with complex, multi-turn, and system-level instructions. A judge model checks each response against expert-written rubrics. MAI-Thinking-1 85%
  • IFStruct In use Models generate JSON or YAML that must follow a requested schema and phrasing constraints, without constrained decoding. A response passes only if every structural constraint holds. LFM3-1.7B 93.7%