Bird-SQL
Models convert natural language questions into SQL over 95 large real databases across 37 domains. Scored by execution accuracy.
The test set is hidden, so model cards usually report the dev set. In November 2025 the team released bird-sql-dev-1106, a cleaned dev split, and asks submissions to say which split they used. BIRD 2.0 is in development.
In the authors’ words
Text-to-SQL parsing, which aims at converting natural language instructions into executable SQLs, has gained increasing attention in recent years. In particular, Codex and ChatGPT have shown impressive results in this task. However, most of the prevalent benchmarks, i.e., Spider, and WikiSQL, focus on database schema with few rows of database contents leaving the gap between academic study and real-world applications. To mitigate this gap, we present Bird, a big benchmark for large-scale database grounded in text-to-SQL tasks, containing 12,751 pairs of text-to-SQL data and 95 databases with a total size of 33.4 GB, spanning 37 professional domains. Our emphasis on database values highlights the new challenges of dirty database contents, external knowledge between NL questions and database contents, and SQL efficiency, particularly in the context of massive databases. To solve these problems, text-to-SQL models must feature database value comprehension in addition to semantic parsing. The experimental results demonstrate the significance of database values in generating accurate text-to-SQLs for big databases. Furthermore, even the most effective text-to-SQL models, i.e. ChatGPT, only achieves 40.08% in execution accuracy, which is still far from the human result of 92.96%, proving that challenges still stand. Besides, we also provide an efficiency analysis to offer insights into generating text-to-efficient-SQLs that are beneficial to industries. We believe that BIRD will contribute to advancing real-world applications of text-to-SQL research. The leaderboard and source code are available: https://bird-bench.github.io/.
- Level
- University Undergraduates and entry-level professionals
- Scored
- Checked automatically A program checks the result against an answer key, unit tests or the expected final state.
- Answers
- Code A program or patch run against tests.
qwen3-coder-next leads with 63.6%
Best score per model as labs report them in their own cards. Labs pick their own settings, so these compare less cleanly than independent runs.
- 1
qwen3-coder-next 63.6%
- 2
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 59.6%
- 3
Cohere Command A 59.5%
- 4
Gemini 2.0 Pro 59.3%
- 5
Gemini 2.0 Flash Feb 2025 58.7%
- 6
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite 57.4%
- 7
Gemini 2.0 Flash Dec 2024 56.9%
- 8
Gemma 3 27B 54.4%
- 9
Gemma 3 12B 47.9%
- 10 Granite 4.2 30B 41.9%
- 11
Nemotron 3 Super 41.8%
- 12
Gemma 3 4B 36.3%
- 13
Gemma 3 1B 6.40%
| # | Model | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | | 63.6% | Feb 2026 | Model card | |
| 2 | | 59.6% | Oct 2026 | Model card | |
| 3 | | 59.5% | Apr 2025 | Model card | |
| 4 | | 59.3% | Feb 2025 | Model card | |
| 5 | | 58.7% | Feb 2025 | Model card | |
| 6 | | 57.4% | Feb 2025 | Model card | |
| 7 | | 56.9% | Dec 2024 | Model card | |
| 8 | | 54.4% | Mar 2025 | Model card | |
| 9 | | 47.9% | Mar 2025 | Model card | |
| 10 | Granite 4.2 30B | 41.9% | Aug 2026 | Model card | |
| 11 | | 41.8% | Mar 2026 | Model card | |
| 12 | | 36.3% | Mar 2025 | Model card | |
| 13 | | 6.40% | Mar 2025 | Model card |
The benchmark's own leaderboard has 116 entries, 13 of them models we track. We plot every source in the charts below.
6 models have held number one since its release in May 2023
Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release. We draw one row each for the benchmark’s own leaderboard and what labs claim in their cards.
Scores over time
All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.
Labs headline it less often now, last in Aug 2026
Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.
| Date | Launch post | Score | As the post writes it |
|---|---|---|---|
| 25 Aug 2026 | Granite 4.2 30B | 41.9 | BirdBench |
| 11 Mar 2026 | 41.8 | BIRD Bench | |
| 12 Mar 2025 | 54.4 | Bird-SQL (dev) (IT) | |
| 5 Feb 2025 | 57.4 | Bird-SQL (Dev) | |
| 5 Feb 2025 | 58.7 | Bird-SQL (Dev) | |
| 5 Feb 2025 | 59.3 | Bird-SQL (Dev) | |
| 11 Dec 2024 | 56.9 | Bird-SQL (Dev) |
10 system cards report it, from 4 labs
Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.
| Date | Document | Score | As the document writes it | Section |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 15 Oct 2026 | | 59.6 | BIRD (text2sql, no tools), BF16 acc. (Table 23) | Capabilities |
| 11 Mar 2026 | | 41.8 | BIRD Bench, dev set, execution accuracy (Table 5) | Capabilities |
| 28 Feb 2026 | | 63.6 | BIRD-SQL (Table 7) | Capabilities |
| 15 Apr 2025 | | 58.7 | Bird-SQL (Dev) (Table, p.3, column Gemini 2.0 Flash (GA)) | Capabilities |
| 10 Apr 2025 | | 57.4 | Bird-SQL (Dev) (Table, p.3) | Capabilities |
| 1 Apr 2025 | | 59.5 | Bird Dev execution accuracy (Table 14, Table 1) | Capabilities |
| 25 Mar 2025 | | 36.3 | Bird-SQL (dev), IT, zero-shot (Table 6) | Capabilities |
| 25 Mar 2025 | | 54.4 | Bird-SQL (dev), IT, zero-shot (Table 6) | Capabilities |
| 25 Mar 2025 | | 6.4 | Bird-SQL (dev), IT, zero-shot (Table 6) | Capabilities |
| 25 Mar 2025 | | 47.9 | Bird-SQL (dev), IT, zero-shot (Table 6) | Capabilities |
More in Coding
- SWE-bench Verified In use 500 human-validated GitHub issues from 12 Python repos. Agent writes a patch that must pass hidden tests. Claude Opus 4.7 83.5%
- SWE-bench Multilingual In use 300 GitHub-issue tasks across nine programming languages in SWE-bench format. Patch graded by repository tests. Claude Opus 5.5 93.9%
- LiveCodeBench v6 In use Competitive programming problems collected after model cutoffs from LeetCode, AtCoder, Codeforces. Scored pass@1 on hidden tests.
DeepSeek-V4-Pro 93.5%
- DeepSWE In use 113 original long-horizon engineering tasks across 91 repos and five languages, written from scratch. Hand-written verifiers accept alternative solutions. GPT-6 Astra 74.1%
- SciCode In use Scientist-curated research coding problems split into subproblems across natural sciences. Code checked against test cases.
Seed2.1 Pro 59.8%
- Codeforces rating In use Model solves recent Codeforces contest problems. An Elo-style rating is computed from simulated contest performance.
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 3,471