Benchmark Almanac

Bird-SQL

qwen3-coder-next 63.6% leads since Feb 2026 Fading

Models convert natural language questions into SQL over 95 large real databases across 37 domains. Scored by execution accuracy.

The test set is hidden, so model cards usually report the dev set. In November 2025 the team released bird-sql-dev-1106, a cleaned dev split, and asks submissions to say which split they used. BIRD 2.0 is in development.

In the authors’ words

Text-to-SQL parsing, which aims at converting natural language instructions into executable SQLs, has gained increasing attention in recent years. In particular, Codex and ChatGPT have shown impressive results in this task. However, most of the prevalent benchmarks, i.e., Spider, and WikiSQL, focus on database schema with few rows of database contents leaving the gap between academic study and real-world applications. To mitigate this gap, we present Bird, a big benchmark for large-scale database grounded in text-to-SQL tasks, containing 12,751 pairs of text-to-SQL data and 95 databases with a total size of 33.4 GB, spanning 37 professional domains. Our emphasis on database values highlights the new challenges of dirty database contents, external knowledge between NL questions and database contents, and SQL efficiency, particularly in the context of massive databases. To solve these problems, text-to-SQL models must feature database value comprehension in addition to semantic parsing. The experimental results demonstrate the significance of database values in generating accurate text-to-SQLs for big databases. Furthermore, even the most effective text-to-SQL models, i.e. ChatGPT, only achieves 40.08% in execution accuracy, which is still far from the human result of 92.96%, proving that challenges still stand. Besides, we also provide an efficiency analysis to offer insights into generating text-to-efficient-SQLs that are beneficial to industries. We believe that BIRD will contribute to advancing real-world applications of text-to-SQL research. The leaderboard and source code are available: https://bird-bench.github.io/.

Abstract of Can LLM Already Serve as A Database Interface? A BIg Bench for Large-Scale Database Grounded Text-to-SQLs (arXiv:2305.03111, CC0)
Made by HKU and Alibaba DAMO Academy Released May 2023 Data science and SQL Public tasks plus a private test set Last in a launch post Aug 2026 , dropped before it saturated Last model added Oct 2026 Scores refreshed 2 Nov 2026
Level
University Undergraduates and entry-level professionals
Scored
Checked automatically A program checks the result against an answer key, unit tests or the expected final state.
Answers
Code A program or patch run against tests.
13
Models scored in lab cards
7
Launch posts list it, from 3 labs
10
System cards report it, from 4 labs

qwen3-coder-next leads with 63.6%

Best score per model as labs report them in their own cards. Labs pick their own settings, so these compare less cleanly than independent runs.

  1. 1 qwen3-coder-next 63.6%
  2. 2 Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 59.6%
  3. 3 Cohere Command A 59.5%
  4. 4 Gemini 2.0 Pro 59.3%
  5. 5 Gemini 2.0 Flash Feb 2025 58.7%
  6. 6 Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite 57.4%
  7. 7 Gemini 2.0 Flash Dec 2024 56.9%
  8. 8 Gemma 3 27B 54.4%
  9. 9 Gemma 3 12B 47.9%
  10. 10 Granite 4.2 30B 41.9%
  11. 11 Nemotron 3 Super 41.8%
  12. 12 Gemma 3 4B 36.3%
  13. 13 Gemma 3 1B 6.40%
#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 qwen3-coder-next 63.6% Feb 2026 Model card
2 Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 59.6% Oct 2026 Model card
3 Cohere Command A 59.5% Apr 2025 Model card
4 Gemini 2.0 Pro 59.3% Feb 2025 Model card
5 Gemini 2.0 Flash Feb 2025 58.7% Feb 2025 Model card
6 Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite 57.4% Feb 2025 Model card
7 Gemini 2.0 Flash Dec 2024 56.9% Dec 2024 Model card
8 Gemma 3 27B 54.4% Mar 2025 Model card
9 Gemma 3 12B 47.9% Mar 2025 Model card
10 Granite 4.2 30B 41.9% Aug 2026 Model card
11 Nemotron 3 Super 41.8% Mar 2026 Model card
12 Gemma 3 4B 36.3% Mar 2025 Model card
13 Gemma 3 1B 6.40% Mar 2025 Model card

The benchmark's own leaderboard has 116 entries, 13 of them models we track. We plot every source in the charts below.

6 models have held number one since its release in May 2023

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release. We draw one row each for the benchmark’s own leaderboard and what labs claim in their cards.

Google DeepMind OpenAI Cohere Qwen Anthropic
Own leaderboard Not tested since Apr 2026
GPT-5.5 72.5%
Lab claims 4 leaders

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

On the benchmark’s own leaderboard Reported by the lab in its model card Best so far
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) GPT-5.5 Qwen3-Coder-480B-A35B Gemini 2.0 Pro GPT-4 T5-3B 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2020 2022 2024 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) GPT-5.5 Cohere Command A

Labs headline it less often now, last in Aug 2026

Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.

Google DeepMind
NVIDIA
IBM
DateLaunch postScoreAs the post writes it
25 Aug 2026 Granite 4.2 30B 41.9 BirdBench
11 Mar 2026 Nemotron 3 Super 41.8 BIRD Bench
12 Mar 2025 Gemma 3 27B 54.4 Bird-SQL (dev) (IT)
5 Feb 2025 Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite 57.4 Bird-SQL (Dev)
5 Feb 2025 Gemini 2.0 Flash 58.7 Bird-SQL (Dev)
5 Feb 2025 Gemini 2.0 Pro 59.3 Bird-SQL (Dev)
11 Dec 2024 Gemini 2.0 Flash 56.9 Bird-SQL (Dev)

10 system cards report it, from 4 labs

Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.

DateDocumentScoreAs the document writes itSection
15 Oct 2026 Nemotron 3.5 Super VL technical report 59.6 BIRD (text2sql, no tools), BF16 acc. (Table 23) Capabilities
11 Mar 2026 Nemotron 3 Super technical report 41.8 BIRD Bench, dev set, execution accuracy (Table 5) Capabilities
28 Feb 2026 qwen3-coder-next technical report 63.6 BIRD-SQL (Table 7) Capabilities
15 Apr 2025 Gemini 2.0 Flash model card 58.7 Bird-SQL (Dev) (Table, p.3, column Gemini 2.0 Flash (GA)) Capabilities
10 Apr 2025 Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite model card 57.4 Bird-SQL (Dev) (Table, p.3) Capabilities
1 Apr 2025 Cohere Command A technical report 59.5 Bird Dev execution accuracy (Table 14, Table 1) Capabilities
25 Mar 2025 Gemma 3 4B technical report 36.3 Bird-SQL (dev), IT, zero-shot (Table 6) Capabilities
25 Mar 2025 Gemma 3 27B technical report 54.4 Bird-SQL (dev), IT, zero-shot (Table 6) Capabilities
25 Mar 2025 Gemma 3 1B technical report 6.4 Bird-SQL (dev), IT, zero-shot (Table 6) Capabilities
25 Mar 2025 Gemma 3 12B technical report 47.9 Bird-SQL (dev), IT, zero-shot (Table 6) Capabilities

More in Coding

All 243 in Coding
  • SWE-bench Verified In use 500 human-validated GitHub issues from 12 Python repos. Agent writes a patch that must pass hidden tests. Claude Opus 4.7 83.5%
  • SWE-bench Multilingual In use 300 GitHub-issue tasks across nine programming languages in SWE-bench format. Patch graded by repository tests. Claude Opus 5.5 93.9%
  • LiveCodeBench v6 In use Competitive programming problems collected after model cutoffs from LeetCode, AtCoder, Codeforces. Scored pass@1 on hidden tests. DeepSeek-V4-Pro 93.5%
  • DeepSWE In use 113 original long-horizon engineering tasks across 91 repos and five languages, written from scratch. Hand-written verifiers accept alternative solutions. GPT-6 Astra 74.1%
  • SciCode In use Scientist-curated research coding problems split into subproblems across natural sciences. Code checked against test cases. Seed2.1 Pro 59.8%
  • Codeforces rating In use Model solves recent Codeforces contest problems. An Elo-style rating is computed from simulated contest performance. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 3,471